Capita faces fresh calls to be stripped of PIP contracts after documentary


One of the three outsourcing giants that assesses people for their eligibility for disability benefits is facing calls for it to be stripped of its contract, after revelations in a Channel 4 documentary.

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is investigating concerns raised by this week’s Dispatches, which saw an experienced mental health nurse, Noel Finn, go undercover to train as a personal independence payment (PIP) assessor with Capita.

Footage he supplied from a hidden camera showed Capita’s chief medical officer, Dr Richard Peters, telling him during his training that the company needed its assessors “to be doing as many assessments a day as you can possibly manage”.

Peters, who has previously worked for Maximus, another of the three outsourcing companies, also told Finn to “forget your mental health background and park it to one side” when carrying out assessments.

Finn then spent several days gaining experience alongside paramedic and PIP assessor Alan Barham, who Capita colleagues described as “the best of the best” when it came to assessing claimants.

Finn’s undercover footage showed Barham admitting that he sometimes completed his assessment reports before even meeting the claimants, telling Finn that he could usually “completely dismiss” what he was told by PIP claimants, and making offensive comments about an overweight claimant who was unable to carry out her own personal care.

Barham, who also runs his own first aid training company, boasted that in the early days of Capita’s PIP contract in 2013, he and other assessors were earning up to £20,000 a month, at a time when DWP was trying to clear an embarrassing backlog of claims.

Barham said that at the time, Capita – which provides assessments on behalf of DWP across central England and Wales – paid £80 an assessment for the first eight assessments completed every week, then £160 for each of the next six, and £300 for each further assessment.

He told Finn: “We were flying through them because of that money.”

His manager was also seen telling Finn that posters advising claimants that they could record their assessments had been removed from the assessment centre’s public area.

The documentary was directed and produced by the disabled journalist Richard Butchins, who was responsible in 2012 for Dispatches revelations about the work capability assessment contractor Atos Healthcare.

Linda Burnip, a co-founder of Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC), repeated DPAC’s call for Capita to be stripped of its contract.

She said: “It only goes to reinforce what we’ve always known which is that neither Capita nor Atos are carrying out accurate assessments for people.

“When Barham said he did the assessments before seeing the person being assessed, that upholds what many have said about the assessment reports bearing no resemblance to their conditions or needs.”

John McArdle, co-founder of Black Triangle, said: “We have been campaigning for private companies to be stripped of having anything to do with the assessment of disabled people from the outset.

“It has become clear [from the documentary]that despite the government’s denials the companies do work to targets and appear to be subject to financial penalties [if they miss those targets]. One of them is lying.”

Caroline Richardson, from the Spartacus online campaigning network, said: “The situation demonstrated by Capita highlights one fundamental problem in the system; that there is no feedback mechanism on assessor performance.

“Their recommendations to the DWP should have a high degree of correlation with the final award.

“I’d consider this to be a key performance indicator (KPI), and the introduction of such a KPI could highlight assessors who are lacking in commitment to providing the excellence expected and required of them.”

PIP, which is gradually replacing working-age disability living allowance (DLA), has been mired in controversy, delays and backlogs ever since its launch in April 2013.

In January, a National Audit Office report showed that 36 per cent of Capita’s PIP assessment reports had failed to meet standards agreed with DWP, compared with the four per cent target set in its contract.

Disability News Service (DNS) began to report on delays and backlogs in the PIP system in late 2013, with some disabled people eventually having to wait more than a year just to be assessed.

In the summer of 2014, Capita launched a huge recruitment drive to cope with its backlogs, amid reports that it was offering staff up to £300 per test – four times the initial rates, and the same figure mentioned by Barham – and was encouraging them to carry out as many assessments as they could.

It then emerged, in January last year, that Capita was making an estimated 80 of its 400 assessors redundant. Five months later it was forced to recruit 90 more healthcare professionals.

And last summer, Capita’s reception staff were sent scripts telling them how to explain to benefit claimants why their appointments had been cancelled.

Weeks later, the company sent out a “very urgent” request for 90 more staff.

By noon today (14 April), Barham had not responded to a request for a comment from DNS.

A DWP spokeswoman said: “DWP is currently looking into some of the comments and issues raised during the programme.

“We will be working with Capita to investigate these issues and concerns.”

Asked about Dr Peters’ comment about “doing as many assessments a day as you can possibly manage”, she said: “Provider performance is measured across a range of service agreements, including quality, performance delivery targets and customer experience.

“Our expectation is that providers meet all of their targets including quality and volume.”

On his comment advising Finn to “forget your mental health background and park it to one side”, the spokeswoman said: “Health professionals are asked to adopt a holistic approach, assessing all the evidence available to them, including their own clinical knowledge to provide advice on the claimant’s level of function and ability across all assessment criteria.”

She added: “DWP demands the highest standards are delivered in terms of its contracted-out services and we are working with Capita to address the issues raised.  

“As Capita stated in their response to Dispatches’ investigation, Alan Barham will no longer be working for Capita.”

On the payments Capita makes to its staff, she said: “The remuneration of Capita staff is a matter for Capita.”

Asked whether DWP would be looking again at all the assessments carried out by Barham, she said: “As outlined above, we are looking into the issues raised in the programme.

“Anybody who feels they have been treated unfairly, can ask for a mandatory reconsideration of their case. They can also appeal if they are not happy with their decision.”

Capita has refused to answer a series of questions from DNS about the programme’s revelations, including: what action it was taking; whether Barham mentored any other new assessors; whether other assessment centres had taken down the notices about recording assessments; whether Capita would change its system of paying assessors per assessment; whether the programme’s contents suggested a culture of disrespect within Capita; whether Capita would be looking again at all of the assessments carried out by Barham; what action it would be taking over Dr Peters’ comments; and whether Dr Peters’ comments accurately reflected the company’s policies and procedures.

Capita did say in a statement: “The comments and actions of this assessor clearly fall short of what we expect and are totally unacceptable.

“We are obviously appalled by and sincerely apologise for this individual’s disrespectful comments and actions.

“If individuals do not meet our expectations we will always take appropriate action. This assessor no longer works for Capita.

“All claimants are fully and clearly informed of their right to make an audio recording of their assessment when they are invited to attend their assessment.

“In accordance with DWP requirements, any claimant who wishes to record his or her assessment needs to make arrangements to record the assessment in advance of attending the assessment centre.

“We expect all of our assessors to undertake assessments as outlined by DWP and in line with our training.

“For all face-to-face assessments, the assessment report is never fully completed prior to a claimant attending their appointment with a disability assessor.

“At no point did the chief medical officer for [Capita’s] PIP contract ever suggest that assessments should be rushed, thereby compromising quality.

“His and Capita’s focus is on undertaking quality assessments in an efficient and professional manner as required by the DWP.

“All our assessments are completed according to the requirements set out by DWP.”

But Professor Peter Beresford, co-chair of the national service-user network Shaping our Lives, said Capita should have to answer all the questions posed by DNS “as a major international outsourcing organisation that expresses a commitment to quality, economy and good standards of practice”.

But he said “the real responsibility continues to lie with the Department for Work and Pensions”.

He added: “It is very difficult for it to maintain a view that the large-scale problems and failings identified in its application of welfare reform can merely be put down to isolated poor practice rather than a seriously defective and irresponsible policy approach.

“There needs to be an independent investigation of the failings identified in the programme as well as the wider failings they reflect.”

Picture: Ade Adepitan, who presented the Dispatches documentary

  • User Ratings (70 Votes)
  • Parklife

    Such a shame C4 used a undercover investigator who has been warned by Northamptonshire police for Disabilty Hate Crime! Shocking as he was discribbed as a caring mental Heath professional with 15 years

  • Sheila Hawken

    Mental state examinations consisting of someone with no training making assumptions about a claimant’s mental health with no discussion about those assumptions cannot be considered an adequate way of assessing risk and fitness for work or the level of care someone may need. People with autism are having shockingly bad assessments because assessors do not have the insight into the condition to realise that although the person in front of them may be aggreing with them, they may well ot understand the questions, are too scared to say so and are just wanting the assessment to end as soon as possible. Given that many also lack the insight themselves to realise how much support they need, these assessments are a farce. It would be interesting to see how much correlation there is between the medical reports, decisions and the level of support required. I know of one case where a general nurse with no autism training gave an autistic man no points for PIP,when he was the subject of a court order in respect of his mental health and received several hours’ support daily in residential accommodation. Another with severe depression needs a lot of care and input to help him to organise his life, he hardly ever leaves his flat because of severe anxiety, lacks the executive functioning to deal with his finances and other issues ryc. Given no points, but needs intensive psychological support. Many people with autistic spectrum disorders also have complex sensory issues, co-morbid dyspraxia, dyscalculia, dyslexia , mental health issues, eating disorders etc, and attending any appointment in a strange place with a stranger who has no clue about any of this is abusive. Given that many of those affected will need to meet new staff with people they already know and trust and can take weeks before they can speak to them, expecting a face-to-face interview to be of any value is ridiculous.The ways in which assessors are told to structure questions is not helpful for someone on the autistic spectrum. Assessors do not realise that the answer given is a literal response and very brief and that there is a wealth of information which should be elicited via supplementary questions. It can be devastating for someone on the autistic spectrum, who has already got low self esteem from being bullied for years, to have to have all of their difficulties spelt out by a carer in front of them, as that is the only way to ensure that a completely inaccurate assessment is made. Many cannot cope with conflict and find this intolerable. It is inexcusable when the relevant information has already been given in writing for a very vulnerable person to have to be paraded in front of an arrogant ignoramus for a face-to-face assessment. There is often a lack of benefits knowledge amongst those working with people on the autistic spectrum and many welfare advisors including CAB staff also do not have the autism knowledge to be able to help appropriately.In fact people on the autistic spectrum are being discriminated against throughout the process. Many cannot cope with making phone calls as they need time to process what is being said, yet they cannot apply by email or answer queries by email. They should not have to phone to make claims, nor should benefits staff phone them out-of-the -blue.DWP decision-makers also are ignorant of the ways that autism can affect the ability to cope and that even those with university degrees may need a high level of support.

    • smiler

      lets hope they were not recorded without their knowledge then

      • trueorfalse4

        you are looking very suspect.

  • jan hamilton

    “Anybody who feels they have been treated unfairly, can ask for a mandatory
    reconsideration of their case. They can also appeal if they are not
    with their decision.”

    Why should it be up to them, what if they know nothing about this programme and it’s contents, surely the dwp know
    exactly who this man assessed, they should as a matter if urgency and
    fairness look at all these claims again.
    Given Barham no longer works for Crapita and the damning evidence we see
    of the assessments and the reports he did, everyone he saw should have
    their cases reviewed as they were hardly fairly treated. How many were
    refused PIP or did not get the correct award due to his shoddiness and
    lies? where is the fairness and recompense for these people? And assuming as an assessor Barnham had some medical training, ie a nurse, physio i would hope he never works within the realms of any type of healthcare system again.

    • trueorfalse4

      ‘Barham, who also runs his own first aid training company’. He runs a training company offering first aid, health and safety etc. Be interesting to know if his crudity displayed on film will effect his client turnover. He was a paramedic.

      • jan hamilton

        really ?? i didn’t realise he was a paramedic. I know for nurses, midwives etc that do assessments there is the NMC or GMC register you can check and report them if necessary, but i’m not sure about a paramedic.

        Hmmm, i hope his training company is affected after this appalling documentary

    • Justin Greenwood

      he should be sued by everyone that has had to appeal through tribunal and reported to the police for various breaches of law

  • Parklife

    Such a shame C4 used a undercover investigatoor who has been warned by Northamptonshire police for Disabilty Hate Crime! Shocking as he was discribbed as a caring mental Heath professional with 15 years experience!

  • RGN007

    “Anybody who feels they have been treated unfairly, can ask for a mandatory
    reconsideration of their case. They can also appeal if they are not
    happy with their decision.”

    My daughter tried to appeal after an incompetent or completely absence of empathy nurse with no knowledge of ME disregarded all our answers. Waiting for the transcript on which to base the appeal took so long, they threw it out and stated we had forwarded no information! Totally pointless!

    There is no feedback on performance even though clinicians are assessing disease processes they have no training in.

    • Justin Greenwood

      the feedback is true, when i complained about my first assessment, they eventually agreed with me and his training for the role was negligable, they also were reluctant to release qualifications citing they were afraid of bad publicity

    • Pamela Stock

      I wouldn’t let it rest there. If you contacted the DWP by phone to ask for a copy of the report and they did not send it to you within the 28 day time limit for a mandatory reconsideration request, you should make a formal complaint to the DWP. They log all phone calls and request letters. You should also contact your MP and ask them to find out why you were treated in this way.

      • RGN007

        We did see MP and made formal complaint but though polite and understanding, I suspect both PIP and DWP are trained to appear helpful but do nothing, no reaction, no response, no further contact etc etc. Labour MP rep was useless and said they could not do anything as not in Government.

        • Pamela Stock

          Wow. You really need to get back on to the DWP and get a disability organisation or citizens advice to help. The DWP have an OBLIGATION to provide you with a written transcript of the ATOS medical in good time for you to ask for a reconsideration.

          Let me explain the process. You get the letter from the DWP decision maker telling you your entitlement. If you don’t agree with it, you must ring DWP within 28 days from the date of their decision letter and ask them for a mandatory consideration – but you tell them that you do not want them to make a decision before you have sent in further supporting evidence to support your dispute. If you don’t tell them this they will look at the decision again almost immediately and it will inevitably remain the same because you haven’t made a case for disputing it. It sounds to me as though this is what has happened in your case. At the same time as you tell them you want a mandatory reconsideration, you ask them for copies of everything they used to make their decision – this means that you get the ATOS medical and you also get to see anything else they may have written off for from people you listed for them to contact on the PIP application form.

          You then send the DWP a letter asking them to look at the decision again, outlining the points you wish to dispute – preferably with fresh medical evidence to support it. This letter needs to be with the DWP within 28 days of the decision letter, as does any supporting evidence – it’s a good idea to ask any doctors or other health professionals you deal with for supporting evidence first and then concentrate on the points you want the DWP to reconsider. Everything you send to the DWP should be sent by registered delivery so they have to sign for it and can’t say they have not received it.

          Al reconsideration request is very difficult to do without first looking at the medical report compiled by ATOS, which the DWP use to make their decision. The DWP know this and there have been several complaints that they are not providing these transcripts in good time – you simply run out of time and once 28 days has passed, they will throw it out. This does NOT absolve them of their duty as you have a right to ask for a reconsideration and you are not allowed to make a formal appeal to a tribunal unless you have been through the reconsideration process.

          The DWP should have given you all of this information in a leaflet along with your decision, and clear instructions on how to ask for a reconsideration, and the fact that they didn’t is also cause for complaint. I would get advice from CAB or an organisation called DIAL, who can provide benefits advice – the number for your local branch should be in yellow pages, but do contact me on if you can’t find it and I will try to find one for you. If you can afford it, legal advice is the best way to go and some legal advisers will do this for a set fee.

          It’s not too late to rectify this and I urge you to at least try and if all else fails, wait a while, get up to date medical evidence and then make a fresh application for PIP on the grounds that the condition is now worse, or has changed since your original application. There is a set time you have to wait to reapply for PIP if you’ve been turned down, so it’s not the best way to go. Get some advice pronto and if you need any further information please don’t hesitate to contact me.

          • RGN007

            I have already done all you describe. I could have written the same advice to someone else.

          • Pamela Stock

            Sorry – only trying to help ………..

    • phil

      Had the mandatory reconsideration and the second decision was word for word exactly the same as the first decision except for one extra piece. After i received the first refusal following my assessment i decided to obtain a letter from my GP to send in with my mandatory reconsideration notice. Please note that neither Atos or DWP had been in touch with my GP and i did not get the letter until after my claim had been dismissed. But in the words of the Decision Maker from DWP, the letter had already been seen at the assessment and had been taken into consideration.

  • Ed Edwards

    i think looking at this program capita should be kicked out and all claiments who feel they have been treated badly SHOULD ALL BE REASSESSED. We all seen the way capita works, from the woman taking information down and the way they tell everyone how to manage assessments…Buck stops with the DWP and they should foot the bill

    • smiler

      if the DWP foot the bill…..surely that’s public money that everyone contributes to with their tax. So it’s ok for someone that doesn’t need a benefit to pay for re-assessment’s of a government benefit!

      • Ed Edwards

        The problem we have here is that we still dont know if the person or persons do or dont need the benefit, this is the reason we have assessment in the first place.

        Now we have found some of these assessments are proven to be dubious and falsely incorrect leaving it impossible to tell the genuine to the not so genuine assessors which leaves us with the same problem as before the assessment, who do or dont need the benefit.

        Now we must decide what we do for those who feel grieved by a assessors decision, are we to leave them without help or money. The government and the DWP was continuously warned what was happening but they chose to ignore the warnings, or did they know and didnt want to do anything. its of no matter now, whats done is done. it where we go from here is the question.

        what we must not do is blame the claiments as it had nothing to do with them, if you want to blame anybody it should be, Capita, Atos or the DWP for letting this happen in the first place.
        The only solution i can see is reassessments and again if you want to blame anybody for wasting taxpayers money for putting it right, blame the government as they had enough warnings and also the buck stops with them

  • jeffrey davies

    oh dear ho dear me their wheels are coming off but one only had to look to usa and see the fraud by these companies but culling the stock through benefit denial has always been the governm,ents way aktion t4 rolling along without much of a ado jeff3

  • cotton buds

    Anyone who had assessment by Alan Barnham should automatically have a new assessment immediately. Find out who did your assessment ??

    • Justin Greenwood

      if they had to appeal the decision they should make a complaint to capita concerning conduct of this employee, if they had a mental health assessment some of the questions that should be asked is has he qualifications to assess a person mental health?, has heen been crb2 enchanced cleared for vunerable adults? has he carried out appropriate training for safeguarding of vunerable adults? you may also mention that in the recording he took photographs of people medical reports to prove that he had carried out the assessments, this is in breach if data protection principles, respect and dignity, patient confidentiality, if your condition worsened due to a bad medical assessment by Alan Barnham then Capita should be held accountable for any costs relating to treatment, suggest finding a good solicitor, this will be a easy case as it is not everyday someone hangs themselves on television, well done ch4 dispatches and the journalist involved as well as the mh nurse

    • Ed Edwards

      I don’t believe it just about this guy it seems the whole system is rotten to the what about the others who report unfairness

  • cotton buds

    Video record assessment visits on phones, camcorders ??

    • smiler

      you need to be able to leave a copy after the assessment un-edited.

      • Justin Greenwood

        i never recorded my interview, my training gives me the skills to be able to listen to a person for a hour and afterwards make notes appertaining to the conversation, wonder if the person that assessed me would have said what he did if he knew my skills base lol

    • Andy Taylor

      No you can not use a video and you have to use a special machine to record the assessment. You can not use a phone or PC and have to Provide THEM with a copy of the recording. it’s diabolical. They should record it and provide YOU with a copy.

      • phil

        As far as i am aware if someone records the assessment then a copy must be made available to the assessor. Recording the assessment with sound and video on a mobile phone then immediately bluetoothing a copy to the assessor confirms with the criteria set out. If they refuse then i would be asking them for a written reason as to why they are refusing to conform to DWP regulations regarding recording assessments. I would then tell them that it is my right to record the assessment and i would start recording. The firstbthing i would say is that i am recording this on a mobile phone the assessor has been made aware and i shall give them a copy at the end of the assessment. At that point if the assessor does object then that is recorded as evidence.

        • Andy Taylor

          We just went through my wife’s assessment and we recorded it. We had informed them before hand and was told it was with twin tapes or twin CD NOTHING else was acceptable. At the start of the interview that was confirmed by the assessor.

        • Andy Taylor

          Oh I forgot to mention if you tell the assessor you are recording it they will stop the interview and ask you to stop.

          If you record it covertly and they see it they will ask you to stop. In either case if you refuse to stop they will cease the interview and report to the DWP that you decided to cancel the interview by your action…. 🙁

  • Ian Crick

    Any assessor who is found to have made false statements in assessments or where claimant is found to be assessed by someone who doesn’t know about their condition should be sacked there and them and made to return every penny they were paid. If the DWP make strict rules and these assessors know the consequences of ignoring them, would it make them think twice before doing this. I am disabled due to severe Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) and I have the tax man chasing me for over £6,000 for not completing self assessment forms for the past 5-6 years. I was on invalidity benefit years ago and due to our local DSS office losing a letter from my GP, they cancelled my claim. I asked for this to be looked at and they apologised and rushed me back onto the benefit, but under the new name Incapacity Benefit. I have since found the difference is that the original was not taxable and the new version is, but I talked to others at the time who had the same problems. Looking at things now and what happened to me then I can see exactly why the DWP are getting these people in to assess claimants. They have no chance of getting the tax off me for a problem they caused and I am dreading when I get the letter to attend my PIP assessment.

    My wife looks after me and when we looked into claiming attendance allowance, they told us not to bother because if we claimed they would take that and an extra £10 from my money. So for my wife to claim for something she does daily, we would be over £40 a month worse off. The disabled have always been the people attacked by the government and we call them government thieves, but they are above all us and it’s nearly impossible to argue with them.

    I have said for years that any person within the government who deals with disabled people or people on benefits, should be made to live exactly the same (same money, food, struggles (daily pains through electrical units) and be given a false ID to go through the claims procedure). This might allow them to see what lots of people go through on a daily basis, while they are sat in a leather chair earning £100’s if not £1,000’s a day.

    Sorry for the long comment, but this makes my blood boil.

  • trueorfalse4

    Justin, As Barham is engaged in his own company and working contracts for Capita it is unlikely he has been a practicing paramedic for some time so I would be surprised if he was still on the register.

    • Justin Greenwood

      he is on the register i checked yesterday, i am giving capita a chance to report him themselves, they don’t take that golden opportunity then they will wish they had done

      • trueorfalse4

        Given the attitude of his manageress and his arrogance I would guess that the management probably turned a blind eye to their prize assessors activities. Please update us if you can.

        • Justin Greenwood

          i try to, i do agree that the attitude of that manageress was awful and she should also be sacked, i wonder how much they try and hide behind the freedom of information act,will see, i have no sympathy or empathy to people like that, they worsened my condition x2 and think there invincible, i call them bullies, a pet hate of mine

          • trueorfalse4

            I suspect the only power these assessors have ever is/has been as a Capita/Atos assessor and they look to enjoy every second of it. Overpaid, greedy, power hungry bullies.

          • Justin Greenwood

            i look at them and apart from one who i attended on behalf of someone at atos i do not see many of them that care and if this policy ever came to a end would i want to see them working within the nhs

    • Justin Greenwood

      he is on the register, let’s see if capita answer the questions i put to them last tuesday

      • trueorfalse4

        oh lervely!, I shall be watching your space!. 🙂

    • everycat

      He is still on the register, so a complaint could be made and they would have to respond.

      First on the list.

  • smiler

    has anyone considered that the “undercover” reporter would have recorded the full private and personal assessment if he sat in on the appointment? Is this Noel Finn being asked to comment on the extent of his filming and what he has done with all this data protected information. Mmmmmm…….not lets just all attack 1 man that said something he shouldn’t have to a colleague. If this Noel Finn can promise on all that he loves that he has never made an un p.c. comment in his mental health nurse career to ANY one……..then he’s god

    • trueorfalse4

      Clarify please; ‘said something he shouldn’t have’, exactly which ‘something’ are you referring to?, he said much that should not have been a thought let alone words!.

    • I’m not aware that he filmed any of the assessments. There was no suggestion of that in the documentary. Can I ask what your interest is in this? Are you a disabled person, a mental health nurse, a Capita employee, a friend of Barham’s? It seems like an odd attitude to take… You describe Barham’s comment as ‘un PC’. I would describe it as totally unprofessional and offensive.

  • smiler

    WHAT ABOUT THE REPORTER….he filmed and recorded the full appointment without the poor person having the appointment knowing about it. God only knows what else may have been mentioned in what would have been considered a personal and private environment… Can no-one see that Channel 4 has broken so many data protection and confidentiality laws and there are victims now suffering from the fall out of this undercover reporter…. He broke the confidentiality rule that Capita would have made him sign!!!! What is this world coming to?

    • Justin Greenwood

      yes they did break the law in terms of a hidden recording, however take this on the other side, if this had not come out, then he would still have been practicing, know one would have known any different and maybe one of his decisions would have if not allready has caused a self harm incident,this has allready been done to atos and i daresay at some point it will be maximus turn, maybe now people will be more wary of these so called professionals and ask fitness to assess questions before they even are allowed to start there medicals as i am sure that if after this anyone who has a medical with capita will be well within there rights to ask the qualifications and training of the professional in question and if there not suitably trained then state that they agreeing to the medical under duress and are not confident in the person ability to carry out the examination

      • Undercover filming is not breaking the law if it is in the public interest and is proportionate to the wrongdoing involved. In this case it is very definitely proportionate…

        • Justin Greenwood

          I know and that is why i stated that if this had not happened, it would have been under the radar, this answer was also in reply to a previous person’s post, more of this needs to be done, where companies hide behind a lie and if covert surveillance is the only way to do it, then i have no issues with that at all

    • trueorfalse4

      What a strange response to something that will benefit disabled people, wonder what your agenda is really?, not a friends of Alan’s are you?.

  • smiler

    and as a mental health nurse, surely the reporter would know how the victims of his secret filming will feel!!! He has filmed vulnerable people talking about their private and personal life without any thought of the consequence!

  • Sandra Bowes-Rennox

    These slime bags are trying to cover there tracks there as bent as corkscrews and in it for the money like ATOS and Maximus and as someone from Maximus told me. .The government lets us do it.

  • Wayne Leon

    If those false ‘assessments’ resulted in the death of the person being ‘assessed’ then whoever did the ‘assessment’ should be charged with CORPORATE MURDER!

  • Johanna D Bolland

    they lied for my assesment 3 times said i could walk 200 metres un aided i can walk about 12ft but have to stop half way as cannot get my breath and because of my leg and back giving way. I had to go to a tribunal and was still refused as half the questions they asked me where false answers put on by Capita. I now get standard rate but i am worse now and i am in a wheelchair most of the time. They should take them all to court for all the lies. And its our dissability money they are paying them with.

  • Sam Stone

    Im a single mum and my daughter was previously receiving high rate dla for care and mobility. She is Type 1 Diabetic and has Elhers Danlos Syndrome, Lupus, Hypermobility, Fibromyalgia, Depression and Anxiety, IBS and Pelvic Inflammatory Disease. Some days she cannot even get out of bed, wash or dress herself. She is in constant pain and discomfort. Walking and moving around is a real struggle for her everyday and she needs constant help 24/7. The occupational therapists and council have just done a £32,500 grant in our house to make life a bit more independent for her with wheelchair access and stair lift etc. So they have seen and know how poorly she is and the help she needs.
    She went to her pip assessment and was in her wheelchair, only to be told she couldn’t go into the assessment in it she would have to walk and if there was a fire there would be no way of her getting out being in the wheelchair.
    They seemed very reluctant to do her assessment, so my partner helped her out and to the lift and went with her, only to be told it was not advisable because again if there was a fire she wouldn’t be able to get out!! His response to them was ‘if there is a fire I will carry her out !’ .
    So why have an assessment centre on a floor that is not wheelchair accessible in the first place?
    We received their award decision and it was for the lower rate pip. They were contradicting everything that we had put on her forms so we appealed and sent further medical evidence and still the same decision was awarded, again contradicting what was there in black and white. So we sent it to the tribunal with further evidence and again it came back as same decision! Do they not read the forms? They took away her mobility car and a big portion of her care allowance. Her car was her only way of feeling a little bit independent even though she always had someone with her. I feel she has been wrongly assessed and would love it if they would reassess everyone as this is so unfair on the people that genuinely need this help.
    I cannot see how they can assess someone if they don’t have the knowledge of these different illnesses and disabilities!! Please enlighten me because I’m confused!
    What do they actually want from people? Do doctors and consultants diagnosis and evidence not stand for anything these days?
    What do you have to do to get a little bit of help where it’s needed?
    Why would the council grant so much money to adapt the house if she has nothing wrong with her? Any views welcome and let’s hope we can all get the help needed for ourselves or loved ones that deserve it. Sam x

  • Morgan Hank

    i cannot believe what i had just read Capita this is disgusting and what the fuck is the government doing about it fucking nothing …wow just wow … sick twisted fucks why the hell should anyone be offered an incentive payment to get though as many claims as possible in a day why not just employ more staff instead of an incentive Capita is sick and twisted it must be said this is a form of mental torture and premeditated murder in my opinion not only did the DWP hire actors to portray disabled people in advertisements to encourage work with false illnesses in the past but now this as well this system needs to be investigated as soon as possible all areas should be hacked and listened to by an emergency division of the government that should be set up to investigate this that has no ties to any other part of the government so that this can be fairly done.

    i just cannot believe people can put other people through this type or torture the amount of suicides in the past that this has caused must be in the thousands not only from the stress of being paraded like an animal now to be hit with truths that its doomed to fail no matter what disabled people do PIP and DLA is a last hope of living ones life with their dignity intact i believe that this should be investigated further in all capitas and ATOs departments and as well as the governments departments whom had any influence or part in this and should be help accountable for the thousands of deaths this has caused and is still causing to this day.

    these people Capitas Atos government divisions involved make me sick.