• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / News Archive / Anger over judge’s ‘appalling’ Winterbourne View hate crime failure

Anger over judge’s ‘appalling’ Winterbourne View hate crime failure

By John Pring on 8th November 2012 Category: News Archive

Listen

A judge has been criticised for his “appalling” failure to treat the “degrading, cruel and inhuman” abuse of people with learning difficulties at a hospital as a disability hate crime.

There was widespread anger among people with learning difficulties and other disabled people at the sentences that were handed out last month to former staff at the Winterbourne View private hospital, near Bristol.

Six of the 11 former employees were given prison terms ranging from six months to two years when they appeared before Judge Neil Ford QC for sentencing at Bristol Crown Court. Another five received suspended prison sentences.

Andrew Lee, director of People First Self Advocacy, said his reaction on hearing the sentences was one of “rage”, while he said the sentence of just two years in prison for Wayne Rogers, recognised as the ring-leader of the abusers, was “woefully inadequate”.

But in the wake of the sentencing, criminal justice agencies refused to say whether the judge had treated the abuse as disability hate crime.

Disability News Service has now obtained a copy of the judge’s sentencing remarks.

He told the court of “a culture of ill-treatment” at Winterbourne View, of “degrading, cruel and inhuman conduct” and of the “miserable existence” the residents were subjected to.

He described how Rogers taunted, slapped and kicked service-users, threatened them with extreme violence and used “wholly inappropriate” methods of restraint.

Other staff admitted pulling their hair, soaking them with water and threatening them, while one slapped a female service-user in the face and told her: “See you later, gimp.”

The convictions followed last year’s screening of an undercover investigation into the abuse by the BBC’s Panorama.

But the sentencing remarks make it clear that the judge did not treat the abusive regime as disability hate crime, even though the Crown Prosecution Service had insisted the offences were “based on ignorance, prejudice and hate”.

If the judge had treated the offences as disability hate crimes, under section 146 of the Criminal Justice Act, the former staff members would have faced tougher sentences.

Stephen Brookes, coordinator of the Disability Hate Crime Network, said it was an “appalling” failure, and “one of the worst examples of judges getting it so horribly wrong” on hate crime.

He said the sentences were “almost a slap on the wrist”, and particularly disappointing at a time when the CPS and police were making some progress in tackling hate crime.

The sentencing came only days after a report by the Equality and Human Rights Commission concluded that action by public bodies to tackle disability-related harassment had been “patchy”, with some authorities “doing nothing or very little at all”.

In March, the government published its own hate crime action plan. One of its three key objectives was for a more “effective” treatment of hate crime by the criminal justice system, with agencies “dealing with offenders robustly”.

The action plan called for a response in which “the court takes into account the aggravating factor of hate crime and applies an enhanced sentence accordingly”.

Despite the judge failing to use section 146 to increase the Winterbourne View sentences, a Ministry of Justice spokesman claimed that courts “already treat all hate crime seriously and aggravate sentences accordingly”.

The Crown Prosecution Service has so far failed to comment.

A spokesman for the Judicial Communications Office said it was “unable to comment on judicial decisions or sentencing”.

8 November 2012 

Share this post:

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on Reddit

Related

‘Muddled’ blue badge reforms ‘are to blame for renewal delays’
6th February 2015
UN debate will be reminder of true inclusive education
6th February 2015
IDS breaks pledge on PIP waiting-times, as tens of thousands still queue for months
30th January 2015

Primary Sidebar

Access

Latest Stories

Government questioned over ‘unforgivable’ failures on vaccine priority

Regulator fails to record key details from scheme sending COVID patients into care homes

‘Why did it take disabled man’s death to lead to rail safety action?’ campaigners ask

Ministers silent after sitting on report on discrimination in politics for more than a year

Claim that government reduced the disability employment gap is wrong, experts tell MPs

Two flagship DWP disability jobs schemes slated in front of MPs

Government’s 2016 welfare reforms ‘had devastating impact on disabled people’

ONS suggests NHS disability discrimination may have increased risk of COVID deaths

DWP records ‘show Tomlinson is either a liar or a fantasist’ over engagement claims

Audio recording option set to be introduced for all PIP assessments, says DWP

Advice and Information

DWP: The case for the prosecution

Readspeaker

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web