• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / Benefits and Poverty / Atos tender ‘misrepresentation’ is causing ‘confusion and anxiety’

Atos tender ‘misrepresentation’ is causing ‘confusion and anxiety’

By John Pring on 13th June 2014 Category: Benefits and Poverty, News Archive

Listen

newslatestDisabled people are facing “confusion, anxiety and stress” because of the “misrepresentation” that helped a company to win a £184 million disability assessment contract, according to a Labour MP.

The claims have been made by Labour MP Fiona Mactaggart, who has written to Conservative work and pensions secretary Iain Duncan Smith to tell him how her constituents in Slough were facing lengthier, more difficult journeys to reach their assessments, and were waiting far longer than they should be.

As first revealed by Disability News Service, Atos won the personal independence payment (PIP) contract by boasting in a tender document of its “extensive” network of 16 NHS trusts, two private hospital chains, and four physiotherapy providers, all of which it said would provide sites where the PIP tests would take place.

But in the months after winning the contract, all but four of the NHS trusts and both of the private hospital chains dropped out.

Atos stated in the tender that it had a network of 740 assessment sites across London and the south of England, but after the contract was signed, it only managed to secure 96 assessment centres.

This meant thousands of disabled people have faced longer delays in being assessed, and longer and more complicated journeys to reach their assessments, often by inaccessible public transport.

Now Mactaggart has described in her letter to Duncan Smith the impact of Atos’s “misrepresentation” on her constituents in Slough.

And she has asked him how his department scrutinised the tender document; whether discrepancies in the Atos tender were highlighted by civil servants; and how the company’s performance was monitored from the start of the contract.

She said the closest assessment centres to Slough were in Ealing (11 miles away), Reading (15 miles) and Neasden (17 miles).

She said: “For those most vulnerable, with severe physical disabilities or mental health issues, the journeys to reach these assessment centres are long and complicated.

“I have spoken to a number of my constituents who have found the prospect of travelling outside Slough completely overwhelming, occasionally resulting in confusion, anxiety and stress.”

Even when claimants are “occasionally” offered a home appointment, they are often scheduled for “months in the future and are thus financially untenable for people who have already been waiting considerable amounts of time”, she said.

She added: “A common experience is that constituents are referred to Assessment Centres further away to ensure they are assessed quicker.”

Mactaggart – who also asked Duncan Smith a series of questions about how the new PIP system was working in Slough – told him that because of Atos’s “misrepresentation” on how many assessment centres it would provide it was “clear that the capacity for assessments has also been grossly misrepresented”.

She also raised new concerns about Atos losing claimants’ documents, causing them “additional distress and financial difficulty”.

She says in the letter: “On a worrying number of occasions, correspondence sent by claimants to ATOS has been lost, misplaced or not noted on the system.

“Many constituents have lodged appeals to decisions because documents sent in have not been considered as part of the application, thus increasing the workload of ATOS.”

She said it was “obvious that the system needs to be far more specialist, tailored, flexible and supportive”.

And she asked Duncan Smith whether DWP had assessed how Atos’s failings were impacting on PIP claimants.

12 June 2014

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter)Share on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on Reddit
Pygmalion at the Old Vic. Access performances. Icons for audio description, captioned, BSL and relaxed performances.

Related

Ministers ignore ESA claimants in suicide prevention strategy… again
14th September 2023
Report calls for ‘proper safety net’ for disabled people
14th September 2023
Minister misleads MPs over plans to remove ‘fitness for work’ safety net
7th September 2023

Primary Sidebar

Pygmalion at the Old Vic. Access performances. Icons for audio description, captioned, BSL and relaxed performances.Pygmalion at the Old Vic. Access performances. Icons for audio description, captioned, BSL and relaxed performances.

Access

Latest Stories

Network Rail admits: ‘We have no idea how many inaccessible bridges we’re building’

Anger as Labour omits ‘vital’ promise on disability rights from policy document

Labour has ‘caved in to vested interests’ on social care, leaked documents show

Fear over council policy that could force disabled people into care homes

Anger at ‘shameful’ failure to include DWP deaths inquiry in Labour policy document

One in three ‘Disability Confident’ employers have employed no disabled people

Austerity changes are reducing impact of accessible housing funds, 12 years on

Ministers ignore ESA claimants in suicide prevention strategy… again

Watchdog appears set to approve mass ticket office closures

Disabled politician sues Lib Dems over discrimination that left her suicidal

Advice and Information

Readspeaker

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2023 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web