• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / Benefits and Poverty / Budget: Social security cap will be ‘disastrous’

Budget: Social security cap will be ‘disastrous’

By John Pring on 21st March 2014 Category: Benefits and Poverty, News Archive

Listen

newslatestGovernment plans to cap the annual amount spent on social security – including key disability benefits – have been criticised by disabled campaigners.

The Conservative chancellor, George Osborne, announced in this week’s budget that the spending cap would be set at £119.5 billion in 2015-16, and would then rise with inflation to reach an expected £126.7 billion in 2018-19.

He said: “In future, any government that wants to spend more on benefits will have to be honest with the public about the costs, need the approval of parliament, and will be held to account by this permanent cap on welfare.”

Parliament will vote on introducing the cap next week.

Osborne’s budget also confirmed that, from October, a seven-day waiting period would apply before someone could claim employment and support allowance (ESA), the out-of-work disability benefit, bringing it into line with jobseeker’s allowance (JSA).

Despite announcing details of the social security spending cap, Osborne failed to mention disability at all in his 55-minute budget speech and there were only two mentions of it in the 122-page budget document.

Spending on the state pension – which makes up nearly half of total social security spending – will be exempt from the cap, as will JSA.

But the budget document confirms that disability living allowance (DLA), attendance allowance, personal independence payment (PIP) and ESA will all be included in the spending cap.

If the government wants to change the level of the cap, there will have to be a Commons debate and vote, led by the work and pensions secretary. There will also be a debate and vote if the government breaches the cap.

Linda Burnip, a member of the steering group of Disabled People Against Cuts, said the benefits cap would have a “devastating effect” on disabled people, but would also “plunge many more children into further poverty and destitution”.

She said: “What is perhaps most surprising is that the Labour party see fit to support this retrograde move as well as the Condems.

“Instead, Labour should be opposing the cap and demanding that disabled people and children are lifted out of poverty and making some sort of attempt to tackle the barriers disabled people face and the real causes of poverty and disadvantage faced by those groups.”

Dr Sarah Campbell, principal co-author of the Spartacus report on the government’s DLA reforms, said: “Social security should always be decided based on need alone. A welfare cap ends that fundamental principle.

“A cursory look at the benefits affected by the cap soon shows that those targeted hardest are disabled people and, rather oddly, poor pensioners.

“Time after time, government policies are hitting the same people. It is time that their actions matched their rhetoric of protecting those who need it most.”

Lorraine Podmore, welfare benefits specialist at financial advisors Frenkel Topping, said the cap would be “disastrous”, and would affect all those who claim benefits, whether in work or not.

She said: “Very much a freeze in real terms, it will lower living standards of those in receipt of benefits relative to the rest of the population.”

She added: “Far from helping those who really need it – such as those in low-income jobs, rehabilitated people seeking work after illness and disability, and those unable to work – this budget leaves already vulnerable people even more exposed.”

And Simon Parkinson, a board member of the Every Disabled Child Matters campaign, said the confirmation of the cap was “deeply worrying for families of children and young people in receipt of DLA or PIP”.

He said: “Whilst the cap may not lead to immediate reductions in spending, it singles out support for parents and disabled people as needing to be capped.

“We do not believe is the right message to be sending out when families of disabled children and young people already struggle to get the support they need and are much more likely to live in poverty.”

20 March 2014

Share this post:

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on Reddit

Related

Audio recording option set to be introduced for all PIP assessments, says DWP
18th February 2021
Secret report casts doubt on DWP’s ‘no duty of care’ claim
11th February 2021
Foxcroft defends Labour’s near-silence over death of Philippa Day
11th February 2021

Primary Sidebar

Access

Latest Stories

ONS suggests NHS disability discrimination may have increased risk of COVID deaths

DWP records ‘show Tomlinson is either a liar or a fantasist’ over engagement claims

Audio recording option set to be introduced for all PIP assessments, says DWP

Tomlinson faces third angry letter from DPOs over ‘shambolic’ national disability survey

Guarded response to health and social care white paper

Campaigners seek urgent support for amendments to domestic abuse bill

Government’s pandemic failings have led to ‘bleak picture of marginalisation’

Secret report casts doubt on DWP’s ‘no duty of care’ claim

Disability Unit accused of ‘shameful manipulation’ over disability strategy note

Autistic activist tells MPs of ‘brutal… aggressive… sink or swim’ support system

Advice and Information

DWP: The case for the prosecution

Readspeaker

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web