• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / News Archive / Campaigner’s court victory over council that risked lives with its tactile paving

Campaigner’s court victory over council that risked lives with its tactile paving

By John Pring on 15th November 2012 Category: News Archive

Listen

15A disabled campaigner has secured a high court victory over his local council, after it put the lives of blind and partially-sighted people at risk by ignoring government guidance on the use of tactile paving at road crossings.

Mohammed Mohsan Ali’s victory came at the end of a three-and-a-half year legal battle with Newham council, in east London, over its decision to develop its own guidelines on tactile paving, also known as bubble or blistered paving.

The Department for Transport (DfT) had developed national guidance on tactile paving, with the help of the charities Guide Dogs and RNIB.

But Newham council introduced 10 pilot sites across the borough in 2009 with its own type of tactile paving, and only then began consulting with disabled people.

Newham’s schemes used grey instead of the more visible red tactile paving, and did not use “tails”, which indicate to a white cane-user the presence of a controlled crossing, such as a “zebra” or “pelican”.

Newham also only used the paving – which indicates where it is safe to cross a road – at controlled crossing points, and not at minor “uncontrolled” crossings.

Ali was one of a group of blind and partially-sighted people who visited some of the sites in January 2010 with members of the RNIB campaigns team. They concluded that Newham’s paving was “dangerous”.

But despite the warnings, Newham rolled out the pilot scheme across the borough later that year, and went ahead with publishing its own guidance.

Ali, who volunteers for RNIB and other disability organisations, said Newham’s actions had created a “life and death situation” and put blind and partially-sighted people at risk.

He said: “There’s a reason the [national] guidelines were drawn up: to ensure the safety of people like me who have sight loss.

“If laid wrongly, the tactile paving could actually be a real danger for blind and partially sighted people and cause them to walk into a busy main road or junction.”

He warned other local authorities that have developed similar guidance to Newham to rewrite their documents. “This case is a wake-up call for other local authorities that they need to get their act together.”

But he said the three-and-a-half year legal battle had been “well worth it”, as it had benefitted many other blind and partially-sighted people.

Concluding that Newham’s guidance was unlawful and should be revised, Mr Justice Kenneth Parker said in his judgement that the DfT’s guidance had been “produced at a high level and involved those with considerable experience and expertise” and that Newham had failed to justify its decision to depart from it.

Richard Stein, a human rights partner at Leigh Day & Co solicitors, who represented Ali, said: “For the planners at Newham to think they knew better, was arrogant, and worse, it put the visually impaired in real danger of serious injury and death.”

A Newham council spokesman said: “We are disappointed by the outcome of the case. The safety of our residents is paramount and our crossing designs are safe and effective, both for pedestrians and motorists.

“We consulted with local residents and carried out a pilot scheme beforehand to help ensure this. We are considering the details of the judgement carefully before deciding our next step.”

15 November 2012

Share this post:

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on Reddit

Related

‘Muddled’ blue badge reforms ‘are to blame for renewal delays’
6th February 2015
UN debate will be reminder of true inclusive education
6th February 2015
IDS breaks pledge on PIP waiting-times, as tens of thousands still queue for months
30th January 2015

Primary Sidebar

Access

Latest Stories

New figures on COVID deaths of younger disabled people ‘show need for vaccine action’

Atos pays out for negligent PIP assessment after visit from debt enforcement officers

Budget’s double blow to disabled people

Treasury rejects delivery of last-ditch appeals for £20 uplift

Anger over disability survey’s ‘degrading’ and ‘insulting’ relationship question

DWP brands DNS ‘vexatious’ for seeking truth about impact of universal credit

Government questioned over ‘unforgivable’ failures on vaccine priority

Regulator fails to record key details from scheme sending COVID patients into care homes

‘Why did it take disabled man’s death to lead to rail safety action?’ campaigners ask

Ministers silent after sitting on report on discrimination in politics for more than a year

Advice and Information

DWP: The case for the prosecution

Readspeaker

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web