• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / Human Rights / Disabled peer helps Lords fight back on judicial reviews

Disabled peer helps Lords fight back on judicial reviews

By John Pring on 12th December 2014 Category: Human Rights, News Archive, Politics

Listen

newslatestA disabled peer has helped to inflict another defeat on the coalition, in a continuing battle over its plans to make it harder to seek judicial reviews of government policies in the courts.

The government wants to use its criminal justice and courts bill to make it more difficult for campaigners – including disabled people’s groups – to test the legality of controversial public sector policies.

Peers had amended the government’s plans, altering the bill so that judges would still have discretion to allow judicial reviews for so-called “minor technicalities” to go ahead, but MPs threw out the amendments made in the Lords.

The Conservative justice minister Lord Faulks told fellow peers, as they debated changes to the bill introduced in the Lords but rejected by MPs: “When used appropriately, judicial review is an essential part of the rule of law, by allowing for the lawfulness of public bodies’ actions to be tested in court.

“But it is an area that has been misused, with claims brought with no real prospect of success, and with a view to delaying and adding expense to perfectly lawful acts that are simply disliked.”

But Baroness [Jane] Campbell, who has fought the plans throughout the bill’s progress, told fellow peers that she remained “deeply troubled” by the government’s changes, which would remove judges’ discretion.

She said: “I know only too well how much vulnerable people, especially those who are disabled, rely on state services and how catastrophic it is when things go horribly wrong.

“I feel that in the other place [Chris Grayling, the Conservative justice secretary] is still peddling the line that judicial review has been hijacked by pressure groups for political campaigning…

“If political campaigning includes campaigning for justice and people’s access to justice, then I am very happy to plead guilty; I am one of those campaigners.”

She said that judicial reviews were even more important in “tough times”, to “ensure that the government do not ride roughshod over their citizens”.

She said that coalition cuts to legal aid were already hindering access to justice “for those at the margins of society, especially disabled people” and that the government’s plans for judicial reviews were “about weakening the ability of ordinary vulnerable people to hold public bodies to account, and increasing the power of the state”.

Baroness Campbell said: “The government want to exclude judicial review for what they call ‘minor technicalities’ – for example, the need for a bit more consultation.

“So much for due process. Removing judges’ current discretion would allow unlawful or dishonest decisions to go unchecked and public bodies to be let off the hook.”

She urged fellow peers to “think about the hundreds of very vulnerable people who will need this over the coming years as, I have to tell the House, things are getting really tough for us”.

The amendment – backed by a number of Conservative and Liberal Democrat peers – was passed by 274 to 205 votes. It will now return to the Commons for further debate, along with two other amendments to the bill.

11 December 2014

Share this post:

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on Reddit

Tags: Baroness Jane Campbell criminal justice and courts bill judicial review Lord Faulks

Related

Government backs down over inaccessible shielding letters, hours before court case
25th March 2021
High court hears of ‘catastrophic’ impact of ‘fitness for work’ system
14th January 2021
Watchdog ‘could finally be set to launch benefit deaths inquiry’
1st October 2020

Primary Sidebar

Access

Latest Stories

Government ‘bans’ thousands of disabled fans from sporting test events

Rail companies apologise after Prince Philip ‘mark of respect’ leaves websites inaccessible

Government rejects chance to promise inquiry into COVID deaths of disabled people

‘Concerning silence’ from government over disability ambassador roles

Atos, Capita and Maximus ‘send almost no safeguarding referrals to councils’

Campaign calls for supermarkets to scrap delivery charges

Apple ‘forced by EHRC to back down in face mask discrimination row’

DWP staff admit inflicting ‘psychological harm’ on claimants during coalition years

Government ‘treats disabled people with contempt’ by handing £2.4 million to charities

Legal threat to PM over lack of BSL interpreter in £2.6 million briefing room

Advice and Information

DWP: The case for the prosecution

Readspeaker

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web