• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / Human Rights / Disabled peer secures victory in battle for new human rights protection

Disabled peer secures victory in battle for new human rights protection

By John Pring on 9th May 2014 Category: Human Rights, News Archive

Listen

newslatestA disabled peer has secured new human rights protection for hundreds of thousands of disabled and older people across the UK who receive council-funded care, after a government concession.

Lord [Colin] Low had been pushing in the House of Lords for an amendment to the government’s care bill that would provide protection for all residents of private sector and charity-run homes.

Although peers approved his amendment – in a significant defeat for the coalition – it was later overturned by MPs.

His amendment aimed to address the problem that the Human Rights Act currently only protects some service-users, leaving hundreds of thousands of others not covered, including those receiving support in their own homes.

Now, following lengthy discussions with Lord Low and other peers, the Liberal Democrat care and support minister, Norman Lamb, has agreed to extend protection to all those who receive care and support arranged or funded – even in part – by their local authority.

Although Lord Low was not able to attend the Lords debate, his fellow crossbench peer Lord Hope said he backed the new amendment.

Lord Hope said: “First, he very much welcomes the amendment and, secondly, he has asked me to express his appreciation for the way [Earl Howe, the Conservative junior health minister, and Norman Lamb] have listened to the views in both houses and have worked very hard to secure an agreement on the current amendment across government.”

Earl Howe said Lord Low’s original amendment had gone “too far”, as it would have applied the Human Rights Act to all social care services regulated by the Care Quality Commission – including those arranged and funded privately – and “would have been the first time that the act applied directly to purely private arrangements where there is no state involvement”.

The bill will now return to the Commons on Monday (12 May), so MPs can consider the amendments made this week by peers. This is likely to be the final stage before the bill receives royal assent.

8 May 2014

Share this post:

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on Reddit

Related

Government’s ‘shocking’ pandemic rights list of shame
25th March 2021
Scottish government ‘must act over disproportionate deaths’
25th March 2021
Regulators face call to act over figures linking COVID deaths with health system
18th March 2021

Primary Sidebar

Access

Latest Stories

Government ‘bans’ thousands of disabled fans from sporting test events

Rail companies apologise after Prince Philip ‘mark of respect’ leaves websites inaccessible

Government rejects chance to promise inquiry into COVID deaths of disabled people

‘Concerning silence’ from government over disability ambassador roles

Atos, Capita and Maximus ‘send almost no safeguarding referrals to councils’

Campaign calls for supermarkets to scrap delivery charges

Apple ‘forced by EHRC to back down in face mask discrimination row’

DWP staff admit inflicting ‘psychological harm’ on claimants during coalition years

Government ‘treats disabled people with contempt’ by handing £2.4 million to charities

Legal threat to PM over lack of BSL interpreter in £2.6 million briefing room

Advice and Information

DWP: The case for the prosecution

Readspeaker

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web