• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Advice/Information
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / News Archive / DLA mobility cut is ‘shameful’ and ‘obscene’, say disabled people

DLA mobility cut is ‘shameful’ and ‘obscene’, say disabled people

By guest on 31st October 2010 Category: News Archive

Listen

Disabled people say that government plans to remove a key mobility-based disability benefit from residents of care homes will tear away their “last shred of independence”.

George Osborne, the chancellor, announced in this month’s spending review that disabled people living in residential homes – unless they fund their own care –will no longer be able to claim the mobility component of disability living allowance (DLA) from 2012-13.

But anger among disabled people at Osborne’s announcement has continued to mount this week.

Alan Doyle, who is tetraplegic, lives in a care home in the West Midlands where the nearest bus service is two miles away, and uses his DLA to pay for adapted taxis to visit his wife at their home, and to go shopping.

He contacted Disability News Service to highlight how the move will affect him.

Apart from his DLA, he only receives a £20 a week “pocket money allowance”, so the DLA cut would prevent him visiting his wife, while he and others in similar situations would be barred from enjoying leisure trips, meeting friends and socialising in the local community.

He added: “In other words, we will be confined to the four walls of the care home with £20 ‘pocket money’ to cover clothing, toiletries and the cost of a telephone and in my case a broadband connection coming under serious consideration.

“It’s clear that the coalition definition of ‘fairness’ and ‘dignity’ and being part of ‘The Big Society’ regardless of your political belief is not extended to disabled members of our ‘civilised society’.”

Disabled campaigner Kaliye Franklin, who blogs on the site Benefit Scrounging Scum, told BBC Radio Leeds that disabled people living in care homes would be “facing looking at all four walls and nothing else all day every day”.

She pointed out that many people use their DLA to buy powered wheelchairs, so removing the benefit could mean “confining people not just to their rooms but to their beds”.

Another blogger, “Incurable Hippie”, said on the site Where’s The Benefit? that the idea of withdrawing the DLA mobility component was “disgusting”.

She said: “The thought that just because somebody was living in a care home, they no longer need to go anywhere, they no longer need mobility equipment, is just obscene.”

And “Meri”, on The Broken of Britain, a site set up to enable disabled people to speak out on disability rights issues, said the DLA move was “shameful” and “based on a stereotype that disabled people in homes have no sense or ability to get out”.

“Anu”, posting on the same site, said: “Those requiring residential care and support still need to be able to book taxis, or use their Motability wheelchairs or vehicles to visit the shops, attend appointments or visit family and friends.”

She added: “If the mobility component of DLA is removed from people who require residential care and support it will literally condemn them to not being able to leave the home.

“People already needing residential care and support will have their last shred of independence torn from them.”

http://benefitscroungingscum.blogspot.com

http://wheresthebenefit.blogspot.com

http://thebrokenofbritain.blogspot.com

28 October 2010

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter)Share on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on RedditShare on LinkedIn
Image of front cover of The Department, showing a crinkled memo with the words ‘Restricted - Policy. The Department. How a Violent Government Bureaucracy Killed Hundreds and Hid the Evidence. John Pring.’ Next to the image is a red box with the following words in white: ‘A very interesting book... a very important contribution to this whole debate’ - Sir Stephen Timms, minister for social security and disability. plutobooks.com and the Pluto Press logo.

Related

‘Muddled’ blue badge reforms ‘are to blame for renewal delays’
6th February 2015
UN debate will be reminder of true inclusive education
6th February 2015
IDS breaks pledge on PIP waiting-times, as tens of thousands still queue for months
30th January 2015

Primary Sidebar

On the left of the image are multiple heads of different colours - white, aqua, red, light brown, and dark green - all grouped together, then the words ‘Join our campaign for a decent life for Disabled people. Campaign for Disability Justice’
Image of front cover of The Department, showing a crinkled memo with the words 'Restricted - Policy. The Department. How a Violent Government Bureaucracy Killed Hundreds and Hid the Evidence. John Pring.' Next to the image is a red box with the following words in white: 'A very interesting book... a very important contribution to this whole debate' - Sir Stephen Timms, minister for social security and disability. plutobooks.com and the Pluto Press logo.

Access

Latest Stories

DWP and Treasury silent over mystery of £2 billion cuts to disability benefits

‘Unacceptable’ new figures show rejections of Access to Work claims have shot up this year

Watchdog’s silence after removing figures that showed social security spending is not ‘spiralling’

Manifesto calls on next Welsh government to enable disabled people to ‘flourish and thrive’

Deaf people who use BSL face ‘entrenched’ health and social care exclusion, say government advisers

Years of scapegoating rhetoric has led to ‘envy and resentment’ of those with blue badges, research finds

Budget’s Motability taxes ‘are devastating, punitive and baffling’ and will add hundreds to upfront payments

Tory government failed to protect disabled people in early months of pandemic, inquiry concludes

DWP failure to provide up-to-date figures on Access to Work cuts is ‘major warning sign’, say campaigners

Inquiry report shows ‘horrific’ Covid death toll among disabled people was not inevitable, say DPOs

Readspeaker
Image of front cover of The Department, showing a crinkled memo with the words 'Restricted - Policy. The Department. How a Violent Government Bureaucracy Killed Hundreds and Hid the Evidence. John Pring.' Next to the image is a red box with the following words in white: 'A very interesting book... a very important contribution to this whole debate' - Sir Stephen Timms, minister for social security and disability. plutobooks.com and the Pluto Press logo.

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Threads
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2025 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web