• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / News Archive / EHRC to probe Treasury’s commitment to equality

EHRC to probe Treasury’s commitment to equality

By guest on 26th November 2010 Category: News Archive

Listen

The equality watchdog is to investigate whether the Treasury has breached its legal duty to consider the impact of its spending cuts on disabled people and other groups.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has been in discussions with the Treasury since June over concerns that it had failed to consider how the cuts would affect disabled people, ethnic minorities and women.

Now the commission says the Treasury has failed to provide the necessary evidence to prove it met its legal duties under the Equality Act 2006 when making the decisions contained in last month’s spending review, which included cuts to employment and support allowance and disability living allowance.

An EHRC spokeswoman told Disability News Service: “We have not got as far as we would have liked with that. That’s why we had to move from an informal to a formal [process].

“From the stuff they have given us, we have not been able to make an assessment as to whether they have complied with their duties.”

A Treasury spokesman said the decision to carry out a formal assessment was taken because it had refused to hand over “sensitive”, unpublished documents connected with the spending review.

But he was unable to explain why the Treasury refused to let the EHRC see the documents.

Even if the EHRC finds the Treasury failed in its legal duties, it will not be able to force it to change its spending decisions.

One possible option would be to ask it to carry out an equality impact assessment (EIA) of its spending decisions. If it fails to comply, the EHRC could then apply to a court for an order forcing the Treasury to carry out the EIA.

Under the public sector equality duties of the Equality Act 2006, which cover race, gender and disability, public bodies must pay “due regard” to equality and consider any “disproportionate” impact on “protected groups” when making decisions.

Where decisions – including those on spending – have a disproportionate impact on a particular group, public bodies must consider how to “avoid, mitigate or justify” that impact.

The EHRC said its assessment would consider decisions made in the spending review but not those announced by the Treasury earlier this summer in the emergency budget.

It said the assessment would “enable lessons to be learnt across government to improve outcomes for protected groups by putting fairness and transparency at the heart of difficult decisions”.

The Treasury spokesman said: “We are confident that we have fulfilled our legal obligations. We will be very cooperative and will give them any information they need.”

The EHRC is set to publish its final report on the assessment next summer.

25 November 2010

Share this post:

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on Reddit

Related

‘Muddled’ blue badge reforms ‘are to blame for renewal delays’
6th February 2015
UN debate will be reminder of true inclusive education
6th February 2015
IDS breaks pledge on PIP waiting-times, as tens of thousands still queue for months
30th January 2015

Primary Sidebar

Access

Latest Stories

DWP staff admit inflicting ‘psychological harm’ on claimants during coalition years

Government ‘treats disabled people with contempt’ by handing £2.4 million to charities

Legal threat to PM over lack of BSL interpreter in £2.6 million briefing room

Government faces legal action over ‘disrespectful’ strategy consultation

‘Vaccine passport’ scheme is ‘deeply troubling’, say disabled artists

DWP decision to resume face-to-face assessments ‘is too soon and too dangerous’

DWP admits number of disability employment advisers plunged during pandemic

DPOs call on minister to scrap ‘unfair’ SEN coronavirus measures

Government’s ‘shocking’ pandemic rights list of shame

Disabled student’s ‘five years of sheer hell’ at university

Advice and Information

DWP: The case for the prosecution

Readspeaker

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web