• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / News Archive / ELECTION 2010: Cuts ‘could make mockery of election pledges’

ELECTION 2010: Cuts ‘could make mockery of election pledges’

By guest on 29th May 2010 Category: News Archive

Listen

Leading disabled people’s organisations (DPOs) have raised grave concerns about the prospect of major cuts to public services, following the creation of a coalition government led by the Conservatives.

As part of the coalition document drawn up by the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats, the parties agreed that £6 billion cuts to “non-front line services” would be made in this financial year.

The Liberal Democrats had warned during the election campaign that further spending cuts should wait until the economic recovery had gathered steam.

But as part of the coalition agreement, the Liberal Democrats have now backed immediate moves to start tackling the UK’s budget deficit.

Sue Bott, director of the National Centre for Independent Living, said: “We are concerned that public expenditure cuts may adversely and disproportionately affect disabled people.”

She said NCIL was keen to work with the new coalition government “in a positive way to ensure that disabled people’s rights and opportunities are maintained and improved”.

But she said that, even though all the political parties had pledged to protect frontline services during the election campaign, there was “plenty of evidence that services on the ground are already suffering”.

She added: “What we are finding in situations reported to us on our information line is that people are already experiencing cut backs in their care packages, some by as much as 25 per cent.”

She said if this was to continue it would “make a mockery of what was said about protecting frontline services”.

And she said NCIL’s fear was that the “invisibility” of disability issues in the election could mean that disabled people would “continue to be disproportionately affected by the cutbacks”.

Jaspal Dhani, chief executive of the United Kingdom’s Disabled People’s Council, agreed that DPOs were concerned about the impact of possible spending cuts, and added: “I think everyone is really feeling nervous.”

He said DPOs – particularly those financially supported by local authorities – were concerned about how cuts to public spending would impact on their own finances.

He said: “This is new territory for everyone.  We don’t know how things are going to pan out.”

Peter De Oude, community involvement manager for Norfolk Coalition of Disabled People, said disabled people were “scared” and “concerned” about the impact of possible cuts to public services on their right to independent living.

He said: “Our members are very, very concerned about cuts in spending.”

He said that spending cuts could mean some disabled people being deprived of the support that would allow them to live independently, and risked a return to the days when disabled people were “treated as charity cases that need pity”.

And he said there were real concerns that a Tory-led coalition would lead to a “bigger role for private sector organisations” in service provision, with less user involvement in the development of services.

De Oude said disabled people would also be concerned that a Conservative-led coalition would be less likely to understand that “disability is a human rights issue”.

“The danger is that it is either being eroded or there is less of a drive to understand the issues that are important to disabled people and in particular that disabled people are human beings.”

13 May 2010

Share this post:

TwitterFacebookWhatsAppReddit

Related

‘Muddled’ blue badge reforms ‘are to blame for renewal delays’
6th February 2015
UN debate will be reminder of true inclusive education
6th February 2015
IDS breaks pledge on PIP waiting-times, as tens of thousands still queue for months
30th January 2015

Primary Sidebar

Access

Latest Stories

Disabled high-rise leaseholders are living in post-Grenfell fear of fire and financial ruin

Disabled people highlight scores of lockdown concerns

Regulator investigates DWP over universal credit ‘cover-up’

Tomlinson held just a handful of external meetings every month early in pandemic

US retail giant faces legal action over new face covering rule

Minister allows transport industry its fourth exemption from access laws

Government’s pandemic failings caused us ‘horrendous’ challenges, say DPOs

Watchdog has approved care settings for COVID patients in only three-fifths of areas

High court is asked to order fresh inquest into death of Jodey Whiting

MPs call for inquiry into government’s role in COVID deaths of disabled people

Advice and Information

DWP: The case for the prosecution

Readspeaker

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web