• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / Politics / Election post-mortem: Number of disabled MPs may have fallen to just five
Emma Lewell-Buck head and shoulders

Election post-mortem: Number of disabled MPs may have fallen to just five

By John Pring on 19th December 2019 Category: Politics

Listen

Disabled campaigners have called for action after last week’s general election appears to have left the House of Commons with just five disabled MPs.

Before the election, there were only seven MPs who have at some point self-described as disabled people, but one of them – Liberal Democrat Stephen Lloyd – lost his seat, while another – Jared O’Mara – did not stand again.

It appears to leave parliament with just five disabled MPs – Labour’s Marsha de Cordova, Emma Lewell-Buck (pictured) and Marie Rimmer, and Conservatives Robert Halfon and Paul Maynard – although it may emerge that some of the many new MPs also self-describe as disabled people.

Disabled campaigners were responding to questions from Disability News Service about the future direction of the disabled people’s movement, following last week’s election result.

Tracey Lazard, chief executive of Inclusion London, said: “The lack of representation of our communities in parliament is shocking but not a surprise – it’s another symptom of our continued marginalisation and exclusion.

“We begin to change this by removing the barriers and addressing the material factors that stop Deaf and disabled candidates being able to stand for selection and campaign during election periods.”

This can include the extra impairment-related costs faced by disabled candidates, such as British Sign Language interpreters, personal assistants and taxis.

Lazard said a first and “crucial” step was for the government to reopen the Access to Elected Office Fund (AEOF).

AEOF was set up in 2012, and funded disability-related costs for parliamentary and other elections, but it was closed by the Conservatives after the 2015 general election.

In response to a legal case brought by three disabled politicians, the government was forced to set up a temporary, partial replacement, the EnAble fund, but that runs out in March, and it was not open to disabled candidates standing in the general election (see separate story).

Mark Williams, from Bristol Reclaiming Independent Living, called for training for potential disabled MPs.

He said: “Over the next few years we will have to train disabled people on how to become MPs and at the same time try to knock down barriers within the system, to make it more accessible for disabled people to be in parliament. This will take quite a lot of training.”

Sue Bott, head of policy and research at Disability Rights UK, said: “We will have to wait for the details, but on the face of it, it is disappointing to see so few disabled MPs.

“We will be arguing for disabled candidates to have their support needs met at elections, which was not the case for this general election.”

Deborah King, co-founder of Disability Politics UK, called for a change in the law to allow MPs to job share, which should make it easier for many disabled people to consider becoming MPs.

She said: “The House of Commons needs to examine the terms and conditions for standing as an MP.

“Many disabled people cannot meet the requirement to work as an MP on a full-time basis. Neither can many women, carers or entrepreneurs.

“The tiny number of disabled MPs in the Commons means that disability issues are not given proper consideration, so changing the law to enable MPs to job share is a way of making the Commons more democratic and effective.”

Mel Close, chief executive of Disability Equality North West, said that – in addition to programmes to support disabled people to become MPs – the entire political structure needed to become more accessible, or disabled MPs would “fail when they get there”.

Simone Aspis, policy and campaigns coordinator for The Alliance for Inclusive Education, said the number of disabled MPs in the new parliament was “very disappointing”.

But she said it was also crucial to have disabled MPs who “support the values and aims and honour the commitments of the [disabled people’s] movement”.

She said: “Sadly, from ALLFIE’s perspective, our experience – other than with Marsha – has been there has been no difference around promoting inclusive education as a result of disabled MPs.

“All the ones we have engaged with, other than Marsha, have supported segregated education.”

 

A note from the editor:

Please consider making a voluntary financial contribution to support the work of DNS and allow it to continue producing independent, carefully-researched news stories that focus on the lives and rights of disabled people and their user-led organisations.

Please do not contribute if you cannot afford to do so, and please note that DNS is not a charity. It is run and owned by disabled journalist John Pring and has been from its launch in April 2009.

Thank you for anything you can do to support the work of DNS…

Share this post:

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on Reddit

Tags: AEOF Conservatives EnAble fund Labour Liberal Democrats

Related

Labour ‘shares concerns’ about government’s work capability assessment plans
23rd March 2023
Labour-linked inquiry set to rule out scrapping care charges
9th March 2023
Labour government will push for jobs for ‘not fit for work’ group, says Ashworth
12th January 2023

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to the free Access London Theatre Guide

Access

Latest Stories

Disability discrimination in Met police is ‘baked into the system’, says report

Evidence mounts of disability benefits white paper’s fatal flaws

Court orders second Jodey Whiting inquest to probe consequences of DWP’s actions

‘Nonsensical’ disability benefits white paper sparks return of Spartacus

Concern over expansion of supported internship scheme ‘with potential for exploitation’

Labour ‘shares concerns’ about government’s work capability assessment plans

‘Heartless’ reforms to disability benefits ‘defy logic’

DWP white paper offers mix of ‘human catastrophe’ and overdue reforms

DWP figures show 600,000 could be missing out on disability benefits

DLA ‘disallowances’ plummeted after death of Philippa Day, DWP figures show

Advice and Information

Readspeaker

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2023 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web