• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / Independent Living / Equality Act ‘simply isn’t strong enough’ for BSL-users, peers are told
David Buxton and Terry Riley from the British Deaf Association giving evidence to peers

Equality Act ‘simply isn’t strong enough’ for BSL-users, peers are told

By John Pring on 30th October 2015 Category: Independent Living

Listen

Two leading Deaf campaigners have told peers – in a ground-breaking evidence session – that the UK’s equality laws do not provide enough protection for users of British Sign Language (BSL).

They want the government to do more to protect BSL-users than is available under the Equality Act and to set up a central fund to pay for interpreters, in a similar way to the voucher systems used by governments in Sweden and Finland.

David Buxton (pictured, left), director of campaigns and communications for the British Deaf Association (BDA), and Dr Terry Riley (right), BDA’s chair, were giving evidence to the Lords committee set up to examine the impact of the Equality Act 2010 on disabled people.

They were the first people to give evidence to a House of Lords committee in BSL.

Buxton told peers that the Equality Act “simply isn’t strong enough”, that “hearing dogs for the deaf have more protection than Deaf people”, and that there should be a dedicated BSL act, which would provide the same legal protection to that currently enjoyed by users of Welsh and Scottish Gaelic.

He pointed to a case in which two BSL-using parents looking for a school for their four-year-old hearing child had been told they would not be provided with BSL interpreters for information evenings at the schools they wanted to visit.

Riley said: “The school will say to the government, ‘We don’t have the money,’ and the government will say, ‘It’s the school’s responsibility,’ so we get stuck in the middle.”

He said he understood the difficult position facing schools, which might have to choose between buying books for their library or paying for an interpreter.

Riley said that new BSL legislation could see the appointment of a commissioner to ensure there was “proper public provision” of BSL interpreting, improve the quality of interpreting and ensure it became a “regulated profession”.

He pointed out that it was currently not possible for a BSL-user to become an MP or peer because interpreters were not allowed on the floor of either the House of Lords or the Commons, and it was not possible for a BSL-user to be part of a jury.

He said: “We have been talking about technology and different things that can remove barriers but when the system itself is removing access that is a real concern.”

He also pointed to “everyday barriers” such as banks that do not allow a Deaf person’s husband or wife to make an important call on their behalf, or the failure to alert Deaf passengers to announcements of changes to train platforms.

Riley said: “We strongly feel we are not seen as being equal.”

And he said that parliament needed to ensure that the concept of reasonable adjustments kept pace with changes in technology, and to define clearly what a reasonable adjustment was for a BSL-user.

Buxton added: “BSL is my first or preferred language. How do you define reasonable adjustments in relation to that?

“Just translating things into English isn’t a reasonable adjustment.”

He said that service-providers have all the power in deciding what “reasonable adjustments” they provide, and added: “We need the law to be very clear in interpretation and parliament needs to be clear about that.

“It shouldn’t be a case of, ‘The provider always wins.’”

Share this post:

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on Reddit

Tags: British Sign Language David Buxton Discrimination Dr Terry Riley Equality Act 2010

Related

We don’t care if our disability ambassadors are disabled, government admits
4th May 2023
Council attacked by MPs over blue badge security ban
27th April 2023
Network Rail’s ‘discriminatory’ plans for two more inaccessible footbridges
20th April 2023

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to the free Access London Theatre Guide

Access

Latest Stories

Disabled mum took her own life after actions of DWP and Capita ‘magnified’ anxiety

Public inquiry on inaccessible footbridge will be ‘line in the sand’, say activists

Thousands of disabled people tell MPs: Cost-of-living crisis is affecting our health

Cost-of-living debate sparked by petitions ‘provides campaigning momentum’

MPs raise concerns over DWP death evidence ‘cover-up’

Watchdog holds back verdict on latest care sector concerns

Fresh doubts over impact of government’s ‘scrap the WCA’ plans

DWP hid vital evidence from starvation death inquiry, board confirms

Document shows NHS England apologised for backing harmful SIM scheme

Disabled activists end campaign after unveiling NHS England’s SIM scheme confession

Advice and Information

Readspeaker

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2023 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web