• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / News Archive / MPs battle with peers over future of equality watchdog

MPs battle with peers over future of equality watchdog

By John Pring on 19th April 2013 Category: News Archive

Listen

theweek120by150The government is engaged in a battle with the House of Lords over the remit of the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), after MPs overturned a major parliamentary victory that had been secured by a disabled peer.

The government wants to remove section three of the Equality Act 2006 – the EHRC’s “general duty” – as part of plans to simplify regulation and reduce “unnecessary red tape” through its enterprise and regulatory reform bill.

The general duty describes how the commission should encourage a society where there is respect for human rights mutual respect between groups, and every individual has an equal opportunity to participate.

Last month, Baroness [Jane] Campbell secured the most notable success of her parliamentary career when her amendment saving the general duty saw the government defeated in the Lords by more than 50 votes.

She had told fellow peers that section three sets out the principles and values that define the commission and was of “enormous significance in terms of culture change in this country”. She was backed by many other leading human rights experts in the Lords.

But when the bill returned to the Commons this week to allow MPs to debate this and other changes made by peers, the government succeeded in overturning Baroness Campbell’s amendment.

Jo Swinson, the Liberal Democrat women and equalities minister, said that any successful organisation must have “clarity of purpose”, and the general duty was more of a “vague and aspirational statement”.

She added: “The change will not hinder the EHRC’s ability to fulfil its important duties and responsibilities.”

But Anne McGuire, Labour’s shadow minister for disabled people, said the general duty was “fundamental to how the EHRC operates” and sets out its “guiding principles and values”.

She praised Baroness Campbell’s “long record of working on human rights and equality issues”, and added: “She knows what she is talking about, and her charge to the government was that they have yet to prove that a commission with fewer powers and tools at its disposal will be more effective than one with the role and powers bestowed on it by Parliament some six years ago.”

Chuka Umunna, Labour’s shadow business secretary, said his party opposed the government’s attempts to scrap the general duty.

He said: “As Baroness Campbell, who sponsored the amendment in the Lords, said, the duty imports the cultural and ethical principles of equality and human rights into the commission’s remit.

“It makes it clear that the commission is there not just to enforce rules but to change culture.”

Last month, Baroness O’Neill, the EHRC’s new chair, told peers the commission believed that – “on balance” – removing section three was “unlikely to have a significant adverse impact on its work”.

But Umunna told MPs the commission now believed the general duty should be retained.

The House of Lords is due to discuss the amendment again on Monday (22 April).

17 April 2013

Share this post:

TwitterFacebookWhatsAppReddit

Related

‘Muddled’ blue badge reforms ‘are to blame for renewal delays’
6th February 2015
UN debate will be reminder of true inclusive education
6th February 2015
IDS breaks pledge on PIP waiting-times, as tens of thousands still queue for months
30th January 2015

Primary Sidebar

Access

Latest Stories

Disabled high-rise leaseholders are living in post-Grenfell fear of fire and financial ruin

Disabled people highlight scores of lockdown concerns

Regulator investigates DWP over universal credit ‘cover-up’

Tomlinson held just a handful of external meetings every month early in pandemic

US retail giant faces legal action over new face covering rule

Minister allows transport industry its fourth exemption from access laws

Government’s pandemic failings caused us ‘horrendous’ challenges, say DPOs

Watchdog has approved care settings for COVID patients in only three-fifths of areas

High court is asked to order fresh inquest into death of Jodey Whiting

MPs call for inquiry into government’s role in COVID deaths of disabled people

Advice and Information

DWP: The case for the prosecution

Readspeaker

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web