• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / Benefits and Poverty / MPs’ report vindicates DNS investigation into Atos PIP contract

MPs’ report vindicates DNS investigation into Atos PIP contract

By John Pring on 20th June 2014 Category: Benefits and Poverty, News Archive

Listen

newslatestA government contractor appears to have used “incorrect and potentially misleading” information to win disability assessment contracts worth nearly £400 million, according to a committee of MPs.

The public accounts committee used evidence provided by Disability News Service (DNS) to make the claims in a report published today (Friday) on the implementation of the new personal independence payment (PIP).

The concerns were first raised in a joint investigation by DNS and the disabled journalist Richard Butchins.

DNS supplied the committee’s chair, Labour MP Margaret Hodge, with the tender document used by Atos to win the contract, as well as copies of news stories run by DNS.

And in March, Butchins briefed Hodge on the scandal before her committee grilled Lisa Coleman, an Atos senior vice president.

Hodge said today: “We are concerned that Atos appears to have included incorrect and potentially misleading information in its bid for the contract.

“Atos stated in its tender document that it had ‘contractual agreements’ in place with a national network of 56 NHS hospitals, 25 private hospitals and over 650 physiotherapy practices to provide assessments. This turned out not to be true.

“The [Department for Work and Pensions] should challenge claims made in bids, so that it can demonstrate it has not relied on inaccurate or exaggerated information when awarding contracts.”

She added: “We would have expected the department to have exercised particular caution in letting this contact, given the poor performance of Atos on work capability assessments.

“The department must take into account previous performance on similar work when running a procurement.”

DNS had passed concerns to the committee about the way the company won the contract to assess PIP claimants across London and the south of England.

Atos had boasted of its “extensive” network of 16 NHS trusts, two private hospital chains, and four physiotherapy providers, all of which it said would provide sites where the PIP tests would take place.

But in the months after the contract was awarded, all but four of the NHS trusts and both of the private hospital chains dropped out.

Atos had stated in the tender that it had a network of 740 assessment sites across London and the south of England, but after the contract was signed, it only managed to secure 96 assessment centres, including not a single one covering a vast sweep of north London, and only one in Suffolk and one in Cambridgeshire.

Because there are so many fewer centres, thousands of disabled people are facing delays in being assessed, and longer and more complicated journeys to reach their assessments, often by inaccessible public transport.

Butchins told DNS: “It’s good to see that the results of our long and thorough investigation into the tender bid by Atos for PIP have finally been taken seriously by parliamentarians and that the public accounts committee have taken on board the fact that private providers will promise things they cannot deliver in order to gain multi-million pound contracts and that the DWP will collude in this sort of ‘snake oil’ salesmanship.

“The people who suffer are the poor and vulnerable when they are perceived as either a burden on the public purse or a revenue stream by corporations.”

20 June 2014

Share this post:

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on Reddit

Related

DWP staff admit inflicting ‘psychological harm’ on claimants during coalition years
1st April 2021
DWP decision to resume face-to-face assessments ‘is too soon and too dangerous’
1st April 2021
DWP faces another call to act over pandemic assessment unfairness
25th March 2021

Primary Sidebar

Access

Latest Stories

DWP staff admit inflicting ‘psychological harm’ on claimants during coalition years

Government ‘treats disabled people with contempt’ by handing £2.4 million to charities

Legal threat to PM over lack of BSL interpreter in £2.6 million briefing room

Government faces legal action over ‘disrespectful’ strategy consultation

‘Vaccine passport’ scheme is ‘deeply troubling’, say disabled artists

DWP decision to resume face-to-face assessments ‘is too soon and too dangerous’

DWP admits number of disability employment advisers plunged during pandemic

DPOs call on minister to scrap ‘unfair’ SEN coronavirus measures

Government’s ‘shocking’ pandemic rights list of shame

Disabled student’s ‘five years of sheer hell’ at university

Advice and Information

DWP: The case for the prosecution

Readspeaker

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web