• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / Transport / Protest planned over rail company’s ‘terrible step backwards’ on access
Rick Burgess, seated, in conversation

Protest planned over rail company’s ‘terrible step backwards’ on access

By John Pring on 7th June 2018 Category: Transport

Listen

Disabled activists are preparing a protest action over a train operator’s plans to run mainline rail services that wheelchair-users will not be able to access.

Disability News Service revealed last week that TransPennine Express (TPE) is to introduce two extra trains, each with four carriages – all of which will be inaccessible to wheelchair-users – onto the line between Liverpool and Scarborough.

Leaked documents showed that 12 services every weekday will run without any provision for wheelchair-users.

TPE said that introducing the extra carriages was part of its franchise agreement with the Department for Transport and Rail North (which represents local transport authorities across the north of England) and will provide additional capacity on the network ahead of the introduction of new trains.

But the news caused outrage among disabled people, and two groups – Greater Manchester Coalition of Disabled People (GMCDP) and Manchester Disabled People Against Cuts (MDPAC) – are now planning a protest before TPE starts using the inaccessible carriages next month.

GMCDP has also launched a petition, calling on TPE to “abandon this discriminatory and likely unlawful plan, and make the necessary arrangements to ensure that every train service it runs is accessible to disabled people”.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has also expressed concern at TPE’s plans.

And one legal advice centre has issued a call for wheelchair-users interested in taking a legal challenge against the move.

TPE’s plans had emerged only days after another rail operator was exposed for threatening disabled people’s right to use public transport.

Govia Thameslink Railway had issued “grossly insulting” guidance to station staff that said they should not attempt to place “persons of reduced mobility” on a train “if there is a possibility of delaying the service”.

Rick Burgess (pictured), a member of both MDPAC and GMCDP, said the protest action against TPE was needed “to prevent this terrible step backwards in disabled people’s right to travel and social inclusion”.

He said: “MDPAC will not accept this retrograde policy of TPE’s that erases our history.”

He said the TPE decision and the guidance issued by Govia Thameslink were together “a worrying thin end of a wedge returning us to the bad old days”.

He said: “TPE will be opposed until they ensure all their services are accessible.

“Discrimination and exclusion will not be tolerated. We also welcome any legal action and union action being considered.”

An EHRC spokesman said: “We are concerned, as we would be if any service is potentially being made harder to access for disabled people.

“We will be monitoring the situation closely.”

He added: “For disabled people, being able to use a public service, like the railway, is vital to independent living.

“We understand this to be a temporary measure, but TPE must make all reasonable adjustments so disabled people can get to work and go about their daily lives.”

He said that EHRC would consider further action if “people or groups come to us with evidence of failures to make those adjustments, or the effectiveness of them”.

Nick Whittingham, chief executive of Kirklees Citizens Advice and Law Centre (KCALC), has already issued a call for disabled passengers willing to take a legal case against TPE.

He said he believed that TPE was “playing around on the edge” of what was legal and ethical.

He said: “It’s one thing to have an existing set-up, a building, a structure, a type of vehicle, that is not accessible and you might have plans in future to make it accessible.

“It is another thing to say, ‘all our trains are currently accessible but we are now going to introduce some old ones that aren’t, which means that each service will no longer be accessible.’”

He added: “I am not sure, given the duty to make reasonable adjustments [under the Equality Act], that saying, ‘Oh, you can wait for the next train,’ is a reasonable adjustment.

“The courts have to decide what a reasonable adjustment is, but that doesn’t sound very reasonable.”

A TPE spokeswoman said last week that the trains were “being used in passenger service on a limited and temporary basis to provide extra seats for customers and to support driver training ahead of the introduction of the first of our brand new Nova trains later this year”.

She admitted that running inaccessible services was “not ideal” but the carriages would only operate on “a small number of services for a limited period of time”.

She said yesterday (Wednesday) that there was “no update” on TPE’s plans.

Share this post:

TwitterFacebookWhatsAppReddit

Tags: EHRC GMCDP Govia Thameslink Manchester DPAC TransPennine Express

Related

Human Rights Act review ‘must not lead to weakening of disabled people’s rights’
10th December 2020
Disabled advisors secure pledge from equality watchdog over DWP deaths inquiry
3rd December 2020
Minister told by human rights experts to end unacceptable education opt-out
26th November 2020

Primary Sidebar

Access

Latest Stories

DPOs ‘shocked and dismayed’ over survey, as government faces threat of legal action

Philippa Day: Secret DWP report reveals errors ‘that led to disabled mum’s death’

Philippa Day: Capita made changes to PIP assessments after young mum’s death

Philippa Day: DWP civil servant denies PIP ‘culture of scepticism’

Silence from police chiefs over face mask exemptions, despite gap in guidance

Call for urgent immigration action over care worker shortage

Documentary exposes hostility… and a need for widespread change in attitudes

Statistics regulator refuses to push DWP over impact of universal credit

Philippa Day: Young mother ‘took her own life after being told to attend PIP assessment’

Philippa Day: DWP phone agent ignored sobbing claimant who later ‘took her own life’

Advice and Information

DWP: The case for the prosecution

Readspeaker

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web