• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Advice/Information
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / Transport / Government refuses to reveal equality impact of ticket office closures
A wall with a grey Department for Transport sign sticking out of it

Government refuses to reveal equality impact of ticket office closures

By John Pring on 7th September 2023 Category: Transport

Listen

The government has refused to release its own analysis of how the proposed closure of nearly 1,000 rail ticket offices will impact on disabled people and other groups protected under the Equality Act.

On the day before the end of a consultation into the proposed closure of most ticket offices in England, the Department for Transport (DfT) rejected a request from disabled campaigners to see its equality impact assessment (EIA).

Although the assessments carried out by the 13 individual train companies have been released (see separate story), the government’s assessment of the overall impact of the closures has not been made available.

The disabled-led campaigning organisation Transport for All (TfA) had asked to see this assessment through a freedom of information request.

But DfT denied the request and said that an EIA might still be used to “formulate” a government policy decision on ticket office closures, if passenger watchdogs object to any of the proposed closures and train companies decide to ignore those objections.

It claimed that its ministers and officials “need a safe space away from public scrutiny” to develop their policy, while train companies need to be confident that they can share information “in an environment which suitably encourages free and frank discussion without fear that information will be prematurely released to the public”.

But TfA said it was “unacceptable that the general public has been denied access to the Government’s own programme-wide assessment and analysis of the proposals, information that could have aided in shaping responses to the consultation”.

TfA has asked the government to reconsider its decision not to release the equality impact assessment, arguing that DfT had “deprived the public of vital information that would have shaped their responses” and that it was “overwhelmingly in the public interest for us to have a full account of what the accessibility implications of these plans are on a system wide level”.

It added: “It is only the Government who continue to try and evade scrutiny. We can only speculate what it is they might be trying to hide.”

Baroness Falkner, chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, said last week that the equality watchdog was “particularly disappointed that the Department for Transport has not yet shown us or published an equality impact assessment on their proposals”.

TfA has previously shown that the proposed closures would have a “disastrous” impact on disabled rail passengers.

It has described how the details within proposals published by the train operating companies “completely contradict” pledges they have made around access to support for disabled passengers, staffing levels, ticket sales, and the treatment of rail staff.

And it has concluded that the proposed closures “will make it impossible for disabled people to access the support we need to travel by rail”.

There were more than 680,000 responses to the consultation by the time it closed on Friday (1 September).

Transport Focus and London TravelWatch will now examine these responses and the closure proposals before responding to the train operators by 31 October.

The train companies can then refer their proposals to transport secretary Mark Harper if they disagree with the conclusions of the two watchdogs.

 

A note from the editor:

Please consider making a voluntary financial contribution to support the work of DNS and allow it to continue producing independent, carefully-researched news stories that focus on the lives and rights of disabled people and their user-led organisations.

Please do not contribute if you cannot afford to do so, and please note that DNS is not a charity. It is run and owned by disabled journalist John Pring and has been from its launch in April 2009.

Thank you for anything you can do to support the work of DNS…

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter)Share on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on RedditShare on LinkedIn

Tags: Accessible transport Department for transport Freedom of Information ticket offices Transport Focus Transport for All

Image of front cover of The Department, showing a crinkled memo with the words ‘Restricted - Policy. The Department. How a Violent Government Bureaucracy Killed Hundreds and Hid the Evidence. John Pring.’ Next to the image is a red box with the following words in white: ‘A very interesting book... a very important contribution to this whole debate’ - Sir Stephen Timms, minister for social security and disability. plutobooks.com and the Pluto Press logo.

Related

Level boarding pledge in government strategy is welcomed, but railways bill amendments are still vital
8th October 2026
National accessibility standards are crucial for addressing transport barriers, Tories hear at conference
8th October 2026
Government refuses to say how many rail stations will provide level boarding after major investment
24th September 2026

Primary Sidebar

On the left of the image are multiple heads of different colours - white, aqua, red, light brown, and dark green - all grouped together, then the words ‘Join our campaign for a decent life for Disabled people. Campaign for Disability Justice’
Image of front cover of The Department, showing a crinkled memo with the words 'Restricted - Policy. The Department. How a Violent Government Bureaucracy Killed Hundreds and Hid the Evidence. John Pring.' Next to the image is a red box with the following words in white: 'A very interesting book... a very important contribution to this whole debate' - Sir Stephen Timms, minister for social security and disability. plutobooks.com and the Pluto Press logo.

Access

Latest Stories

Whately appears to agree social security spending is not spiralling after all… as Tories plan £36 billion-a-year cuts

Shadow minister says parents don’t ‘game’ SEND system… but Kemi says disabled adults do ‘game’ the benefits system

Level boarding pledge in government strategy is welcomed, but railways bill amendments are still vital

DWP silent after Tory member of PIP review publishes report demanding child disability benefits are slashed

Access failures at Tory conference leave wheelchair-user suspended in mid-air for more than an hour

Ministers’ decision to slash accessible housing targets was ‘unprincipled’, but Timms says they were right

Greens sideline disabled people at annual conference

National accessibility standards are crucial for addressing transport barriers, Tories hear at conference

Tories discriminate against disabled editor by blocking DNS from receiving key information at conference

Free social care is coming… but only if you’re over 65, government confirms after Burnham speech

Readspeaker
Image of front cover of The Department, showing a crinkled memo with the words 'Restricted - Policy. The Department. How a Violent Government Bureaucracy Killed Hundreds and Hid the Evidence. John Pring.' Next to the image is a red box with the following words in white: 'A very interesting book... a very important contribution to this whole debate' - Sir Stephen Timms, minister for social security and disability. plutobooks.com and the Pluto Press logo.

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Threads
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2026 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web