• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Advice/Information
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / News Archive / Government set to drop two more rail access schemes

Government set to drop two more rail access schemes

By John Pring on 11th April 2014 Category: News Archive, Transport

Listen

newslatestTransport ministers look set to drop two more rail access improvement schemes, only days after admitting they had slashed spending on their main programme by nearly 30 per cent.

Campaigners described the cuts as a “kick in the teeth” for disabled and older rail passengers.

Last week, Disability News Service (DNS) reported that the government had cut the budget for the Access for All programme from £370 million over its first 10 years to just £103 million over the next four.

This will mean a drop from £37 million a year to less than £26 million a year across England, Wales and Scotland, and an average of less than 10 stations improved every year rather than 16 a year over its first 10 years.

But the Department for Transport (DfT) also has two smaller funding schemes, with a £37.5 million programme for mid-size projects, set up three years ago and due to end this year, and about £7 million-a-year funding available to train operators for smaller-scale access improvements, which has been used to improve more than 1,100 stations since 2006.

A DfT spokeswoman confirmed this week that there were “currently no plans to repeat the mid-tier programme”, which was set up using £37.5 million in savings from other programmes.

And she said she was “unable to confirm at this stage” whether the £7 million-a-year small programme – which is given by DfT to train operators based on the number of passengers who use the stations they manage – would be extended beyond 2015,  even though Network Rail published its new £38 billion five-year plan last week.

She said: “We are currently discussing with train operators how they plan to spend their allocations for the 2014-15 financial year.”

She added: “It is important to remember that Access for All and our other funding schemes are over and above the access improvements that the industry is required to deliver as a matter of course whenever they carry out infrastructure works at stations.

“In addition, we are looking at how we can continue and build on the work already done under Access for All.”

Only about 450 of more than 2,500 UK railway stations currently have step-free access via lifts or ramps to all of their platforms.

Lianna Etkind, campaigns coordinator for the user-led charity Transport for All (TfA), said: “Cutting funding for rail access is not only a kick in the teeth to disabled and older passengers, it’s also a foolish measure that flies in the face of DfT’s own valuations of the economic benefit of the programme.”

She said that DfT’s figures show a “conservative estimate” of a £2.90 benefit for every £1 invested in Access for All.

She said: “Four out of five rail stations are inaccessible to those of us who can’t do steps, and slashing funding for access risks setting back transport equality yet again.

“We urge the government to invest in rail access schemes and influence the rail industry to play its part in funding access improvements.”

Etkind said that evidence showed clearly that station access improvements such as new lifts and signage benefit all passengers and lead to increased ticket sales.

She added: “It’s high time that the UK followed the example of other European countries and ensured that the rail companies pay their fair share of access improvements.

“Train companies, as well as nearby businesses, see increased revenue when station access is improved – why should they get all of the benefits whilst the taxpayer shoulders all the costs?”

She pointed to London Underground, which has “pioneered clever ways of leveraging third-party funds” for lift developments at Tower Hill tube station (paid for by a property developer through a “section 106” planning agreement) and at Harrow-on-the-Hill (paid for by selling part of the station carpark for a housing development).

She added: “TfA believe that access improvements need to be written into franchise agreements so that train companies are compelled to invest in a railway that is open to all.”

10 April 2014

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter)Share on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on RedditShare on LinkedIn
Image of front cover of The Department, showing a crinkled memo with the words ‘Restricted - Policy. The Department. How a Violent Government Bureaucracy Killed Hundreds and Hid the Evidence. John Pring.’ Next to the image is a red box with the following words in white: ‘A very interesting book... a very important contribution to this whole debate’ - Sir Stephen Timms, minister for social security and disability. plutobooks.com and the Pluto Press logo.

Related

Level boarding pledge in government strategy is welcomed, but railways bill amendments are still vital
8th October 2026
National accessibility standards are crucial for addressing transport barriers, Tories hear at conference
8th October 2026
Government refuses to say how many rail stations will provide level boarding after major investment
24th September 2026

Primary Sidebar

On the left of the image are multiple heads of different colours - white, aqua, red, light brown, and dark green - all grouped together, then the words ‘Join our campaign for a decent life for Disabled people. Campaign for Disability Justice’
Image of front cover of The Department, showing a crinkled memo with the words 'Restricted - Policy. The Department. How a Violent Government Bureaucracy Killed Hundreds and Hid the Evidence. John Pring.' Next to the image is a red box with the following words in white: 'A very interesting book... a very important contribution to this whole debate' - Sir Stephen Timms, minister for social security and disability. plutobooks.com and the Pluto Press logo.

Access

Latest Stories

Whately appears to agree social security spending is not spiralling after all… as Tories plan £36 billion-a-year cuts

Shadow minister says parents don’t ‘game’ SEND system… but Kemi says disabled adults do ‘game’ the benefits system

Level boarding pledge in government strategy is welcomed, but railways bill amendments are still vital

DWP silent after Tory member of PIP review publishes report demanding child disability benefits are slashed

Access failures at Tory conference leave wheelchair-user suspended in mid-air for more than an hour

Ministers’ decision to slash accessible housing targets was ‘unprincipled’, but Timms says they were right

Greens sideline disabled people at annual conference

National accessibility standards are crucial for addressing transport barriers, Tories hear at conference

Tories discriminate against disabled editor by blocking DNS from receiving key information at conference

Free social care is coming… but only if you’re over 65, government confirms after Burnham speech

Readspeaker
Image of front cover of The Department, showing a crinkled memo with the words 'Restricted - Policy. The Department. How a Violent Government Bureaucracy Killed Hundreds and Hid the Evidence. John Pring.' Next to the image is a red box with the following words in white: 'A very interesting book... a very important contribution to this whole debate' - Sir Stephen Timms, minister for social security and disability. plutobooks.com and the Pluto Press logo.

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Threads
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2026 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web