• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / News Archive / Anger as council plans to push disabled people into residential care

Anger as council plans to push disabled people into residential care

By guest on 10th May 2012 Category: News Archive

Listen

A cost-cutting local authority is set to force more disabled people into residential care, rather than paying for them to receive support in their own homes.

Disabled activists have reacted furiously to the proposals by Worcestershire County Council which are now subject to a three-month consultation and are expected to save £200,000 in the first year.

Under the plans, new service-users – or existing service-users whose needs change – who have a support package where the costs exceed a certain limit will be told to either meet the shortfall themselves, find a cheaper means of support – perhaps by using direct payments – or “receive their care in a residential or nursing home”.

A council spokesman told Disability News Service that “home or community care packages” would be the “most cost effective and appropriate option” in some cases, but he added: “It is about meeting those eligible assessed care needs in the most cost-effective way for everyone who has a call on the council’s budget.”

He denied that the Conservative-run council would be “forcing people into residential homes” and claimed the policy was about “working with service-users to find the most suitable and cost-effective way of meeting their assessed eligible care needs”.

The proposals came as the government’s Queen’s speech appeared to signal further delays to the reform of long-term funding of adult social care, as campaigners such as the disabled peers Baroness [Jane] Campbell and Lord [Colin] Low warned that the system was “chronically under-funded”.

Linda Burnip, a steering group member of Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC), said the council’s proposals were “totally unacceptable”.

She said: “If any single council can get away with this sort of thing, it will just cause a domino effect and all councils will try and do it.

“It is totally against the UN Convention [on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities] and the rights of disabled people.”

In a joint statement, DPAC and the Social Work Action Network said the plans would see the “abandonment of a crucial right that disabled people have fought for and won: to be socially included rather than ghettoised or institutionalised”.

They said there was “no possible justification for this kind of social policy which is prepared to sacrifice quality of life and people’s rights at the altar of ‘current financial challenges’”.

Sue Bott, director of development and lead on co-production for Disability Rights UK, said the proposals were “a very real threat to disabled people”.

She said there now seemed to be a “free-for-all”, with councils taking ever harsher steps to cut spending on support, and no sign of any government action to stop them.

Councillor Philip Gretton, the council’s cabinet member with responsibility for adult social care, said it was a “difficult proposal” but had to be “viewed in the context of the current financial challenges we face”.

10 May 2012

Share this post:

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on Reddit

Related

‘Muddled’ blue badge reforms ‘are to blame for renewal delays’
6th February 2015
UN debate will be reminder of true inclusive education
6th February 2015
IDS breaks pledge on PIP waiting-times, as tens of thousands still queue for months
30th January 2015

Primary Sidebar

Access

Latest Stories

DWP staff admit inflicting ‘psychological harm’ on claimants during coalition years

Government ‘treats disabled people with contempt’ by handing £2.4 million to charities

Legal threat to PM over lack of BSL interpreter in £2.6 million briefing room

Government faces legal action over ‘disrespectful’ strategy consultation

‘Vaccine passport’ scheme is ‘deeply troubling’, say disabled artists

DWP decision to resume face-to-face assessments ‘is too soon and too dangerous’

DWP admits number of disability employment advisers plunged during pandemic

DPOs call on minister to scrap ‘unfair’ SEN coronavirus measures

Government’s ‘shocking’ pandemic rights list of shame

Disabled student’s ‘five years of sheer hell’ at university

Advice and Information

DWP: The case for the prosecution

Readspeaker

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web