• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / News Archive / Appeal ruling confirms ‘landmark’ DDA victory for carers

Appeal ruling confirms ‘landmark’ DDA victory for carers

By guest on 1st November 2009 Category: News Archive

Listen

An appeals court has confirmed a ground-breaking decision that carers can secure protection from discrimination under the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA).

The European Court of Justice ruled in July 2008 that those “associated” with disabled people, such as carers, also had rights under the DDA.

An employment tribunal judge subsequently confirmed that the DDA could apply to “associative” discrimination.

The employment appeal tribunal has now confirmed that decision, with Mr Justice Underhill dismissing an appeal against the judge’s ruling.

The case that sparked the appeal involves carer Sharon Coleman, who claims she was forced to quit her job as a legal secretary in 2005 after she was discriminated against by her former employer.

She claims that London legal firm Attridge Law accused her of being “lazy” when she needed to take time off to care for her disabled son, and threatened her with disciplinary action.

Mr Justice Underhill said that Coleman’s case could now, “at last”, be heard by an employment tribunal.

Ruth Scott, director of policy and campaigns at disability charity Scope, welcomed the “landmark” ruling.

She said: “This is a great result – it goes some way towards recognising the important role informal carers play in supporting disabled children, adults and older people and highlighting the specific types of discrimination they experience.

“This landmark ruling will become all the more important as demographic changes result in more people trying to balance work and caring responsibilities.”

2 November 2009

Share this post:

TwitterFacebookWhatsAppReddit

Related

‘Muddled’ blue badge reforms ‘are to blame for renewal delays’
6th February 2015
UN debate will be reminder of true inclusive education
6th February 2015
IDS breaks pledge on PIP waiting-times, as tens of thousands still queue for months
30th January 2015

Primary Sidebar

Access

Latest Stories

Disabled high-rise leaseholders are living in post-Grenfell fear of fire and financial ruin

Disabled people highlight scores of lockdown concerns

Regulator investigates DWP over universal credit ‘cover-up’

Tomlinson held just a handful of external meetings every month early in pandemic

US retail giant faces legal action over new face covering rule

Minister allows transport industry its fourth exemption from access laws

Government’s pandemic failings caused us ‘horrendous’ challenges, say DPOs

Watchdog has approved care settings for COVID patients in only three-fifths of areas

High court is asked to order fresh inquest into death of Jodey Whiting

MPs call for inquiry into government’s role in COVID deaths of disabled people

Advice and Information

DWP: The case for the prosecution

Readspeaker

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web