• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / News Archive / Autism strategy has ‘serious flaws’

Autism strategy has ‘serious flaws’

By guest on 1st December 2010 Category: News Archive

Listen

The new national strategy for adults with autism is proving to be “seriously flawed” and “dreadfully disappointing”, according to autistic rights campaigners.

The Autistic Rights Movement United Kingdom (ARM UK) spoke out as the government published new statutory guidance for local authorities and the NHS across England.

ARM UK, which is a user-led organisation, has been highly critical of the strategy – published by the previous government in March – over its failure to demand real change from public bodies.

The new guidance focuses on staff training; diagnosis and assessment of needs; support for young people with autism as they move into adulthood; and local planning and leadership in provision of services.

But one of its “underlying principles” is to “avoid new burdens or extra requirements” on health and social care professionals, with the emphasis instead on “making sure existing policies are followed”.

ARM UK criticised the failure to force local authorities to set up autism partnership boards – the guidance suggests instead that they might want to “consider” setting one up – which could allow people with autism to hold councils to account.

ARM UK also pointed to the absence of regional bodies that could monitor implementation and compare progress across different local authorities.

Russell Stronach, co-chair of ARM UK, said the “vast majority” of people with autism would not receive improved support services from their local authority, with those with higher support needs continuing to receive services for people with learning difficulties, while those with lower support needs would be ineligible for services from cash-strapped councils that are being forced to make cuts.

Stronach said: “The whole strategy is proving to be seriously flawed. The will of parliament is being subverted and the hopes of all those people out there are being dashed.”

He said the guidance was “a bit clearer” than the draft version but “generally it is the same situation – it’s not strong enough”. He said it was “dreadfully, dreadfully disappointing”.

Adrian Whyatt, also co-chair of ARM UK, said there had been “some improvement” in the guidance since its draft version was published, including “a recognition of the need to tackle sensory overload in the built environment”.

But he said there was a string of omissions in the guidance, including the need for “universal design” and the vital concept of “neurodiversity”, which explains the “uneven profile” that neurodiverse people – including those with autism – have in processing information.

He said such an explanation was “essential for a proper understanding” of how to meet the “needs and aspirations” of neurodiverse people.

Whyatt added: “If they had listened sufficiently to the voice of neurodiverse – including autistic-led – organisations, then all of this would have been there.

“Only by listening to us fully and properly will we get a strategy and guidance which work.”

Sarah Lambert, head of policy for the National Autistic Society (NAS), said the guidance had been “significantly improved” since the draft version and was “a massive step-change”.

She said it would impose important new duties on councils to assess the needs of people with autism properly, although she said there were “obvious problems in terms of cuts”.

Lambert said the NAS would work with local campaigners to push for autism partnership boards in every part of the country.

A Department of Health spokeswoman said: “Although the guidance does not impose a direct requirement [on] local authorities to set up autism partnership boards, local authorities and NHS bodies must follow this guidance or provide a good reason why they are not doing so.”

And she said that a set of “key outcomes” and “service ambitions”, to be published soon, would help local populations and service commissioners and providers compare progress with other areas.

She said the strategy and guidance were about “making existing resources work better for people with autism”.

Meanwhile, a protest organised by the London Autistic Rights Movement and ARM UK took place outside the event where the guidance was launched, over the lack of user-led representation on the body overseeing the strategy’s implementation.

21 December 2010

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter)Share on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on RedditShare on LinkedIn
A photograph shows an audience raising their hands in a BSL sign. The words say: 'BSL Conference 2025. The future starts with us. Leeds 17-18 July. Be part of shaping the future of Deaf cultures and identities. Get 10% off with BDA10'

Related

‘Muddled’ blue badge reforms ‘are to blame for renewal delays’
6th February 2015
UN debate will be reminder of true inclusive education
6th February 2015
IDS breaks pledge on PIP waiting-times, as tens of thousands still queue for months
30th January 2015

Primary Sidebar

On the left of the image are multiple heads of different colours - white, aqua, red, light brown, and dark green - all grouped together, then the words ‘Campaign for Disability Justice. Sign up to support. #OpportunitySecurityRespect’
A photograph shows an audience raising their hands in a BSL sign. The words say: 'BSL Conference 2025. The future starts with us. Leeds 17-18 July. Be part of shaping the future of Deaf cultures and identities. Get 10% off with BDA10'

Access

Latest Stories

‘Disastrous’ cuts bill that leaves legacy of distrust and distress ‘must be dropped’

Four disabled Labour MPs stand up to government over cuts to disability benefits

Silence from MP sister of Rachel Reeves over suicide linked to PIP flaws, just as government was seeking cuts

Disabled people receiving care were ‘ignored by design’ during the pandemic, Covid inquiry hears

Disabled activists warn Labour MPs who vote for cuts: ‘The gloves will be off’

GB News says it has nothing to apologise for, after guest suggests starving disabled benefit claimants

SEND inspections find services in just one in four areas usually lead to ‘positive’ outcomes for disabled children

Disabled MP who quit government over benefit cuts tells DNS: ‘The consequences will be devastating’

Disabled peers plan to ‘amend, amend, amend, amend, amend’ after assisted dying bill reaches Lords

Minister finally admits that working-age benefits spending is stable, despite months of ‘spiralling’ claims

Advice and Information

Readspeaker
A photograph shows an audience raising their hands in a BSL sign. The words say: 'BSL Conference 2025. The future starts with us. Leeds 17-18 July. Be part of shaping the future of Deaf cultures and identities. Get 10% off with BDA10'

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Threads
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2025 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web