• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / Independent Living / Call for more councils to debate ILF, as Bristol backs closure rethink

Call for more councils to debate ILF, as Bristol backs closure rethink

By John Pring on 19th September 2014 Category: Independent Living, News Archive

Listen

newslatestDisabled people have been urged to press their own local authorities to debate coalition plans to close the Independent Living Fund (ILF), after a council voted to demand a rethink, following a campaign led by disabled people.

Councillors in Bristol voted this week to call on their elected, independent mayor George Ferguson to commit to ring-fencing the funding the government plans to pass to local authorities when it closes ILF next June.

They also called on Ferguson to write to the leaders of all the main political parties, asking them to commit to reinstating the ILF, or at least explain how they would provide ring-fenced funding to ensure ILF-users “continue to receive the same standard of care and support they receive at present”.

And they called on Ferguson to work with the leaders of the other eight “core cities” – England’s largest city economies outside London, and Glasgow – to persuade the government “to reinstate a centrally-funded and centrally-administered scheme”.

The motion – passed by 34 votes to 18, with seven abstensions – was put forward by Bristol city council’s Green group, and amended by Labour councillors.

The mayor will now discuss the motion with council officers, before announcing what action he plans to take.

ILF is a government-resourced trust which helps about 18,000 disabled people with the highest support needs – including more than 100 people in Bristol – to live independently, but the coalition plans to close it in June 2015 and pass the non-ring-fenced funding to local authorities.

The success of the motion has been welcomed by Bristol Disability Equality Forum (BDEF), which has campaigned to save ILF and has held discussions with councillors from the Greens, Labour and the Liberal Democrats.

BDEF formed an ILF action group after a conference on the future of the fund that was held in Bristol in September 2013, and was organised by BDEF, with support from the West of England Centre for Inclusive Living, and ILF and council staff.

BDEF said ILF had “made it possible for thousands of disabled people with high support needs to live in their own homes, contribute to family and community life and to take part in work and education”, and warned that its closure would have “a drastic impact on these disabled people, their family members and communities”.

The forum said the closure posed a “very real” threat to ILF recipients in Bristol, who could be forced into “an isolated existence”, or into residential care.

In a statement released before the vote, the forum said: “This all has come at a time when disabled people have already been hit the hardest by welfare reform, cuts to services and [the] combined impact of austerity measures.

“It is for these reasons that we view the closure of the ILF as part of a wider agenda that affects all disabled people.”

The statement added: “The closure of the ILF will shift responsibility to local councils, placing already cash-strapped authorities under more financial pressure.”

Disability Rights UK said it was “delighted” with the vote.

Sue Bott, director of policy and development, said: “It is good to see councillors in Bristol debating what is such an important issue for many disabled people.

“We have been able to contribute to this debate through our FOI [Freedom of Information Act] requests to local authorities on what their intentions are when the ILF transfers to them.

“We urge disabled people everywhere to talk to their local councillors and ask them to debate and pass a motion on similar lines to the one passed in Bristol.”

18 September 2014

Share this post:

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on Reddit
Groundhog Day at the Old Vic, access performances, with icons for audio description, captions, relaxed performances and British Sign Language, and a picture of a groundhog

Related

Review finds multiple agencies failed over Whorlton Hall abuse scandal
1st June 2023
Call for direct action protests to build support for ‘radical’ social care reform
1st June 2023
Watchdog holds back verdict on latest care sector concerns
25th May 2023

Primary Sidebar

Access

Latest Stories

DWP hands hundreds of millions more to firms linked to claimant deaths… but not Atos

Review finds multiple agencies failed over Whorlton Hall abuse scandal

Regulator tells government’s access advisers to act on unlawful secrecy

Government breaks pledge to consult on improvements to housing adaptations

Broadcaster’s silence over ‘rabblerouser’ tweet on disability benefits

Met’s mental health emergency warning ‘risks creating serious harm’

Call for direct action protests to build support for ‘radical’ social care reform

Disabled mum took her own life after actions of DWP and Capita ‘magnified’ anxiety

Public inquiry on inaccessible footbridge will be ‘line in the sand’, say activists

Thousands of disabled people tell MPs: Cost-of-living crisis is affecting our health

Advice and Information

Groundhog Day at the Old Vic, access performances, with icons for audio description, captions, relaxed performances and British Sign Language, and a picture of a groundhog
Readspeaker

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2023 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web