• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / Independent Living / Call for more councils to debate ILF, as Bristol backs closure rethink

Call for more councils to debate ILF, as Bristol backs closure rethink

By John Pring on 19th September 2014 Category: Independent Living, News Archive

Listen

newslatestDisabled people have been urged to press their own local authorities to debate coalition plans to close the Independent Living Fund (ILF), after a council voted to demand a rethink, following a campaign led by disabled people.

Councillors in Bristol voted this week to call on their elected, independent mayor George Ferguson to commit to ring-fencing the funding the government plans to pass to local authorities when it closes ILF next June.

They also called on Ferguson to write to the leaders of all the main political parties, asking them to commit to reinstating the ILF, or at least explain how they would provide ring-fenced funding to ensure ILF-users “continue to receive the same standard of care and support they receive at present”.

And they called on Ferguson to work with the leaders of the other eight “core cities” – England’s largest city economies outside London, and Glasgow – to persuade the government “to reinstate a centrally-funded and centrally-administered scheme”.

The motion – passed by 34 votes to 18, with seven abstensions – was put forward by Bristol city council’s Green group, and amended by Labour councillors.

The mayor will now discuss the motion with council officers, before announcing what action he plans to take.

ILF is a government-resourced trust which helps about 18,000 disabled people with the highest support needs – including more than 100 people in Bristol – to live independently, but the coalition plans to close it in June 2015 and pass the non-ring-fenced funding to local authorities.

The success of the motion has been welcomed by Bristol Disability Equality Forum (BDEF), which has campaigned to save ILF and has held discussions with councillors from the Greens, Labour and the Liberal Democrats.

BDEF formed an ILF action group after a conference on the future of the fund that was held in Bristol in September 2013, and was organised by BDEF, with support from the West of England Centre for Inclusive Living, and ILF and council staff.

BDEF said ILF had “made it possible for thousands of disabled people with high support needs to live in their own homes, contribute to family and community life and to take part in work and education”, and warned that its closure would have “a drastic impact on these disabled people, their family members and communities”.

The forum said the closure posed a “very real” threat to ILF recipients in Bristol, who could be forced into “an isolated existence”, or into residential care.

In a statement released before the vote, the forum said: “This all has come at a time when disabled people have already been hit the hardest by welfare reform, cuts to services and [the] combined impact of austerity measures.

“It is for these reasons that we view the closure of the ILF as part of a wider agenda that affects all disabled people.”

The statement added: “The closure of the ILF will shift responsibility to local councils, placing already cash-strapped authorities under more financial pressure.”

Disability Rights UK said it was “delighted” with the vote.

Sue Bott, director of policy and development, said: “It is good to see councillors in Bristol debating what is such an important issue for many disabled people.

“We have been able to contribute to this debate through our FOI [Freedom of Information Act] requests to local authorities on what their intentions are when the ILF transfers to them.

“We urge disabled people everywhere to talk to their local councillors and ask them to debate and pass a motion on similar lines to the one passed in Bristol.”

18 September 2014

Share this post:

TwitterFacebookWhatsAppReddit

Related

Watchdog has approved care settings for COVID patients in only three-fifths of areas
23rd December 2020
High court care charging victory ‘highlights flawed social care system’
23rd December 2020
Legoland agrees sweeping changes after leaving disabled five-year-old ‘humiliated’
17th December 2020

Primary Sidebar

Access

Latest Stories

Government’s pandemic failings caused us ‘horrendous’ challenges, say DPOs

Watchdog has approved care settings for COVID patients in only three-fifths of areas

High court is asked to order fresh inquest into death of Jodey Whiting

MPs call for inquiry into government’s role in COVID deaths of disabled people

Tomlinson misleads MPs twice about pandemic contact with disability network

High court care charging victory ‘highlights flawed social care system’

Campaigner’s research shows rail access information is often ‘wildly inaccurate’

Minister calls for evidence on neurodiversity in criminal justice system

Prime minister must abandon ‘reckless’ COVID Christmas plans, say DPOs

Call for action over ‘scandal’ of benefit claimant suicides ignored by DWP

Advice and Information

DWP: The case for the prosecution

Readspeaker

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web