• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / News Archive / Campaigners set for legal action as welfare bill clears final hurdle

Campaigners set for legal action as welfare bill clears final hurdle

By guest on 4th March 2012 Category: News Archive

Listen

The government’s controversial welfare reform bill – which will see huge cuts to disability benefits among other major changes – has cleared its final parliamentary obstacle and is now set to become law.

Following the failure of peers and MPs to reverse the most damaging aspects of the bill, disabled people’s organisations are now likely to take legal action against parts of the legislation, once it becomes law.

Campaigners pointed out that the bill cleared its final hurdle in the Lords just hours before the publication of a report by the parliamentary joint committee on human rights (JCHR), which warns that the government’s reforms and cuts to disability benefits and services would put disabled people’s right to independent living at risk.

Neil Coyle, director of policy and campaigns for Disability Rights UK (DR UK), said the coincidence of the report coming out as the bill was being passed was “very embarrassing” for the government.

He said: “The JCHR made clear that there are significant risks for disabled people with the government’s welfare proposals, particularly with the cumulative effect when social care changes are taken into account as well.”

He said he and colleagues had been asking the government for 18 months to carry out a full assessment of the impact on disabled people of all of the cuts and reforms taken together, but it had yet to do so.

Coyle said legal action on the bill was now being discussed by organisations including DR UK.

He said: “A lot of organisations are exploring options right now based on the final proposals [in the bill].”

Many disabled activists expressed despair at the final passing of the bill.

Sue Marsh, who has played a key part in campaigning against the cuts to disability benefits, wrote in a “graphic, uncomfortable” post on her blog how the decision to pass the bill meant that she and others like her had “lost everything”.

She described in depth the huge impact that Crohn’s disease has on her day-to-day life, and said she believes that despite that, the bill means she will soon receive no disability benefits at all.

Another disabled activist who has campaigned prominently against the bill, Lisa Egan, told a Westminster meeting hosted by the Labour MP John McDonnell that she was “terrified and heartbroken” by the passing of the bill and the impact it will have on her own support.

The government is cutting spending on disability living allowance by 20 per cent and says it wants to focus on people with higher support needs, which Egan fears will see much of her support removed.

The bill cleared its final hurdle after peers backed down in their final confrontation with MPs, this time over cuts to housing benefit paid to working-age residents of social housing with spare bedrooms.

Peers had proposed an amendment that would have protected some disabled people from cuts to their benefits, but it was overturned in the Commons last week.

This week, peers proposed a new amendment that would have forced the government to commission an independent review of the new measures six months after they were introduced.

The disabled crossbench peer Baroness [Tanni] Grey-Thompson backed the new amendment, and said: “As we have read in the press yet again today, many disabled people are being portrayed as benefit scroungers.

“That causes me great concern as we make some of these changes. The review is vital if we are to ensure that our worst fears are not realised.”

But Lord Freud, the Conservative welfare reform minister, refused to accept the new amendment as part of the bill, although he said the government would research the impact of the measures once they were introduced.

1 March 2012

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter)Share on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on Reddit
Pygmalion at the Old Vic. Access performances. Icons for audio description, captioned, BSL and relaxed performances.

Related

‘Muddled’ blue badge reforms ‘are to blame for renewal delays’
6th February 2015
UN debate will be reminder of true inclusive education
6th February 2015
IDS breaks pledge on PIP waiting-times, as tens of thousands still queue for months
30th January 2015

Primary Sidebar

Pygmalion at the Old Vic. Access performances. Icons for audio description, captioned, BSL and relaxed performances.Pygmalion at the Old Vic. Access performances. Icons for audio description, captioned, BSL and relaxed performances.

Access

Latest Stories

Network Rail admits: ‘We have no idea how many inaccessible bridges we’re building’

Anger as Labour omits ‘vital’ promise on disability rights from policy document

Labour has ‘caved in to vested interests’ on social care, leaked documents show

Fear over council policy that could force disabled people into care homes

Anger at ‘shameful’ failure to include DWP deaths inquiry in Labour policy document

One in three ‘Disability Confident’ employers have employed no disabled people

Austerity changes are reducing impact of accessible housing funds, 12 years on

Ministers ignore ESA claimants in suicide prevention strategy… again

Watchdog appears set to approve mass ticket office closures

Disabled politician sues Lib Dems over discrimination that left her suicidal

Advice and Information

Readspeaker

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2023 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web