• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / Archive / COMMENT: The Independent Living Fund: ‘We fight on!’

COMMENT: The Independent Living Fund: ‘We fight on!’

By John Pring on 7th March 2014 Category: Archive

Listen

theblogopinion

By Stuart Bracking

The decision by the current Disabled People’s Minister Mike Penning to press ahead with the closure of the Independent Living Fund is clearly very disappointing, and has been greeted in one discussion forum with dismay by severely disabled people who use the Fund.

While the Court of Appeal in November was prepared to acknowledge the potentially very grave impact the closure of the Fund would have on its users when it unanimously quashed the original decision, it found the coalition government and Esther McVey did not exercise the same discretion in December 2012.

The Fund was set-up in 1988 with the express condition that its severely disabled users live in the community rather than residential care.

When health and social care were restructured in 1993, the Fund was retained because the then Disabled People’s Minister Nicholas Scott recognised there was limit to what local authorities would be prepared to spend on disabled people with complex conditions.

The original Fund was not conjured out of thin air as a benevolent act by the state, but was the result of years of campaigning by disabled people’s organisations.

It stemmed from the success of disabled pioneers such as Pamela La Fane who fought successfully for the right to leave her long-stay hospital in the 1960s, and Leonard Cheshire residents such as John Evans and Philip Mason who secured the right in the early 1980s to control ‘community care’ funding to employ their own personal assistants so they could live independently.

In pursuit of an agenda first shaped a decade ago to transfer responsibility for Independent Living Fund users to local authorities as part of New Labour’s public service reforms and the erosion of the welfare state, Mike Penning now argues to retain the Fund would fail “to take account of the significant developments in adult social care and the changes which have been made in the past 20 years, in the way disabled people are supported to live independent lives.”

What many Independent Living Fund users and their families are acutely aware of is these ‘significant developments’ have resulted in a situation where more than 400,000 disabled people of all ages are now confined to residential or nursing care, and 45% die within the first year after admission.

For many Fund users with ‘round-the-clock’ needs whose control of their personal assistance has allowed them to lead active, independent lives because of the strict standards they maintain towards their personal care and well-being, a difficult future awaits them if their current funding which is based on an individual assessment of their needs is cut.

Rather than learn from the success of Independent Living Fund users, and help our society to turn a corner and provide ‘care and support’ in the community rather than the current malaise where twice as much is spent a year on residential care than community-based services, Mike Penning’s decision moves us in the opposite direction.

Severely disabled people have never been free of a day-to-day struggle against the social barriers and discrimination that often prevent us from leading an ‘ordinary life’, or the chaos that sometimes results from the dysfunctional relationship between health, social care and welfare services struggling to meet our needs with scarce resources.

Pamela La Fane, John Evans, Philip Mason and thousands more disabled people and family carers never shied away from the struggles before them. Independent Living Fund users and their families will not do that now. We fight on!

 

Share this post:

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on Reddit

Tags: Independent Living Fund Stuart Bracking

Related

Watchdog’s report spotlights ‘shocking’ impact of pandemic on social care in Scotland
8th October 2020
Round-up: Letter to DWP on £20 uprating, ILF survey… and PIP telephone assessments
4th June 2020
Northern Ireland to consider expansion of Independent Living Fund
5th March 2020

Primary Sidebar

Access

Latest Stories

Claimant deaths still linked to systemic flaws in benefits system, DWP document shows

Coffey scrapped plan for independent review of sanctions, DWP admits

Second Labour-led inquiry in two months fails to demand end to care charges

Silent vigil will mark latest stage in fight for second Jodey Whiting inquest

Disability poverty campaign calls on PM to act urgently on prepayment meters

‘Halt new mental health bill until there is a public inquiry into deaths and abuse’

Investigation reveals ‘discrimination and hostility’ faced by disabled parents

Warning of ‘humanitarian crisis’ if governments fail to act on disability poverty

Fresh plans to shut down protests ‘show government is running scared’

Universal credit judgment ‘shows legal system has failed us again’

Advice and Information

Readspeaker

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2023 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web