• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / News Archive / Confusion after minister claims reserved posts are illegal

Confusion after minister claims reserved posts are illegal

By guest on 2nd January 2010 Category: News Archive

Listen

An equalities minister has caused bemusement among members of the disability movement after claiming it was illegal for them to reserve jobs solely for disabled people.

Maria Eagle – a former disabled people’s minister – made the comments this week during a one-off evidence session on the work of the Government Equalities Office.

During questioning from MPs on the communities and local government committee about disability measures in the equality bill, Eagle made it clear that “positive action” – favouring the disabled person when faced with two equally qualified job candidates – was legal and would stay legal under the bill.

But she also appeared to say that only allowing disabled applicants to apply for a particular job was illegal and would remain so in the equality bill.

Asked whether it was legal to state in an advert that only disabled people could apply for a job she replied: “That isn’t permissible, no, I don’t think that is permissible, no.

“There are some posts under previous – I think the race legislation – that were reserved in that way but not under the disability legislation.”

Reserving posts for disabled people is a widespread practice both in disabled people’s organisations (DPOs) and across the wider disability sector.

Jaspal Dhani, the new chief executive of the United Kingdom’s Disabled People’s Council – who himself was appointed to a “reserved post” – said he believed the minister’s comments were “inaccurate”.

He said: “It is important for DPOs because you want to have employees that represent the community you serve and have that personal experience.”

Caroline Ellis, joint deputy chief executive of RADAR, said she also believed the minister had made a mistake.

She said: “If we wanted to reserve a post for a disabled person, there is nothing to stop us doing that.

“There is no limit to the extent in which you can do positive action. We do that and nobody has ever challenged that.”

She said recruiting to reserved posts was a widespread practice by DPOs, and added: “Basically, Eagle’s got it wrong.”

Dr Phyllis Starkey, the Labour MP who chairs the committee, said: “I understand how important it is to get clarity on this matter and once we have seen the record of what the minister actually did say, it may be that we will need to seek clarification from the minister.”

The Government Equalities Office said it could not comment until the “corrected oral evidence from the session” was available in writing.

28 January 2010

Share this post:

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on Reddit

Related

‘Muddled’ blue badge reforms ‘are to blame for renewal delays’
6th February 2015
UN debate will be reminder of true inclusive education
6th February 2015
IDS breaks pledge on PIP waiting-times, as tens of thousands still queue for months
30th January 2015

Primary Sidebar

Access

Latest Stories

ONS suggests NHS disability discrimination may have increased risk of COVID deaths

DWP records ‘show Tomlinson is either a liar or a fantasist’ over engagement claims

Audio recording option set to be introduced for all PIP assessments, says DWP

Tomlinson faces third angry letter from DPOs over ‘shambolic’ national disability survey

Guarded response to health and social care white paper

Campaigners seek urgent support for amendments to domestic abuse bill

Government’s pandemic failings have led to ‘bleak picture of marginalisation’

Secret report casts doubt on DWP’s ‘no duty of care’ claim

Disability Unit accused of ‘shameful manipulation’ over disability strategy note

Autistic activist tells MPs of ‘brutal… aggressive… sink or swim’ support system

Advice and Information

DWP: The case for the prosecution

Readspeaker

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web