• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / Benefits and Poverty / Council challenged over DLA in latest ‘bedroom tax’ court case

Council challenged over DLA in latest ‘bedroom tax’ court case

By John Pring on 24th January 2014 Category: Benefits and Poverty, Housing, News Archive

Listen

newslatestA disabled couple are challenging their council’s decision that their disability benefits must be taken into account when deciding the level of housing benefit they receive, in the latest legal challenge around the government’s controversial “bedroom tax”.

Lawyers have been granted permission to bring a judicial review of the decision of Sandwell council that the couple’s disability living allowance (DLA) must be counted as income when assessing how much discretionary housing payments (DHP) they are given.

The lawyers, from legal firm Irwin Mitchell, argue that the council’s policy breaches both the Equality Act and the Human Rights Act.

They believe similar policies are in place in other councils and could be affecting hundreds of disabled people across the country.

The bedroom tax was introduced last April and financially punishes tenants in social housing if they are assessed as “under-occupying” their homes.

The couple have lived in their home for more than 20 years and are happy to move to a smaller property, but the lack of suitable, accessible accommodation – they need to live on the ground floor and have easy access to their mobility vehicles – means they have to continue to use some of their DLA to meet the rent shortfall caused by receiving a lower DHP.

The female claimant receives the higher rate of both the mobility and care components of DLA, while her husband receives higher rate mobility and middle rate care.

The judicial review is likely to be heard by the high court in March or April.

Fiona McGhie, the Irwin Mitchell public law specialist who is heading the claimants’ case, said the imposition of the bedroom tax – referred to by the government as the spare room subsidy removal (SRSR) – meant that her clients faced “a shortfall between their benefits and outgoings which means they currently need to also apply for a DHP to simply keep a roof over their heads”.

She said: “However, the key problem is that Sandwell, like many other councils, is now taking into account DLA when deciding on the amount of DHP they are eligible to receive – a decision we believe is unreasonable and not theirs to make.

“The effect of the decision is to drive disabled people into poverty.”

McGhie added: “With many local authorities following similar principles to Sandwell, we feel that the judgment in this case may have a major impact on the future of how councils assess benefits issues and will provide clarity to the law around this complex area.

“This policy essentially means councils are determining or passing judgment on what disabled people should be using their DLA for without clear legal authority to do this.

“DLA is paid to meet disability-related costs – not housing costs.”

A Sandwell council spokeswoman said: “We are giving this matter active consideration but we believe that we have interpreted the government’s legislation correctly.”

A Department for Work and Pensions spokesman declined to comment on the judicial review itself, but said: “DHPs are run at the discretion of local councils so they can best support their local communities.

“However, we provide guidance to councils on whether to disregard income from disability-related benefits when cash is committed to costs such as mobility schemes or provision of care.”

Meanwhile, the court of appeal has reserved judgement after a three-day hearing this week into whether the bedroom tax discriminates against disabled adults.

Five disabled people lost their high court case against the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) last summer, but subsequently won permission to appeal.

The high court ruling had confirmed the government’s position that the SRSR regulations still apply to disabled adults who need their own bedrooms for impairment-related reasons, but do not apply to disabled children in similar situations.

Speaking before the court of appeal hearing began, Ugo Hayter, from the legal firm Leigh Day, which is representing two of the five claimants, said: “We are very confident that the court of appeal will see that the decision to implement this legislation by the government was clearly discriminatory and will overturn last year’s ruling by the high court.

“It is a cruel and deeply disturbing benefit cut which hits the most vulnerable in society.”

24 January 2014

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter)Share on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on RedditShare on LinkedIn
A photograph shows an audience raising their hands in a BSL sign. The words say: 'BSL Conference 2025. The future starts with us. Leeds 17-18 July. Be part of shaping the future of Deaf cultures and identities. Get 10% off with BDA10'

Related

Government ignores warnings of new DWP deaths, and UN intervention, as MPs pass universal credit cuts bill
10th July 2025
Race against time to secure DWP deaths evidence before parliament passes new benefit cuts bill
10th July 2025
Minister ignored concerns from disabled advisers, months before publishing cuts bill
10th July 2025

Primary Sidebar

On the left of the image are multiple heads of different colours - white, aqua, red, light brown, and dark green - all grouped together, then the words ‘Campaign for Disability Justice. Sign up to support. #OpportunitySecurityRespect’
A photograph shows an audience raising their hands in a BSL sign. The words say: 'BSL Conference 2025. The future starts with us. Leeds 17-18 July. Be part of shaping the future of Deaf cultures and identities. Get 10% off with BDA10'

Access

Latest Stories

Government ignores warnings of new DWP deaths, and UN intervention, as MPs pass universal credit cuts bill

Urgent letter from UN to Labour government warns: We think your cuts continue Tory attack on disability rights

Race against time to secure DWP deaths evidence before parliament passes new benefit cuts bill

‘Complete shift in thinking’ needed on education of disabled children, says ALLFIE

Minister ignored concerns from disabled advisers, months before publishing cuts bill

Frustration after government only issues partial ban on new floating bus stops

Report suggests five big ideas that could transform disabled people’s mobility

My new book shows exactly why we need the disability movement, says disabled author

‘Disastrous’ cuts bill that leaves legacy of distrust and distress ‘must be dropped’

Four disabled Labour MPs stand up to government over cuts to disability benefits

Advice and Information

Readspeaker
A photograph shows an audience raising their hands in a BSL sign. The words say: 'BSL Conference 2025. The future starts with us. Leeds 17-18 July. Be part of shaping the future of Deaf cultures and identities. Get 10% off with BDA10'

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Threads
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2025 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web