• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / News Archive / Council that kept man in care for a year breached his rights

Council that kept man in care for a year breached his rights

By guest on 1st June 2011 Category: News Archive

Listen

A young disabled man had his human rights breached by his local council after it refused to release him from respite care that was only supposed to last for a few days, a court has ruled.

Hillingdon Council in London kept Steven Neary – who has autism learning difficulties and high support needs – in care for nearly a year, against his father’s wishes.

The Court of Protection ruled that the council had breached Neary’s human rights by misusing the Mental Capacity Act’s Deprivation of Liberty safeguards.

Mr Justice Peter Jackson said the council had turned the spirit of the act “on its head”, with “a code designed to protect the liberty of vulnerable people being used instead as an instrument of confinement”.

The court ruled that the council had unlawfully deprived Steven Neary of his liberty and breached his right to respect for his family life, under the European Convention on Human Rights.

Mr Justice Peter Jackson said he was “necessarily critical” of decisions taken by the council during 2010 – which Neary spent in a council-managed support unit – but accepted that during that year he had received “committed care”.

But he said the council “acted as if it had the right to make decisions about Steven, and… tried to wear down [his father’s] resistance, stretching its relationship with him almost to breaking point”.

And he said that if the council’s plans had succeeded, Steven Neary might have “faced a life in public care that he did not want and does not need”.

Neary returned to his father’s care last December as a result of a ruling by another judge.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission – which “intervened” in the court case – welcomed the ruling as a “significant victory for the human rights of disabled people and their carers”.

John Wadham, the EHRC’s group director legal, said the commission had intervened because the council was “failing to uphold Steven’s human rights”.

He said: “He, like everyone else, has a right to personal freedom and a family life and the state should not take away this without good reason.

“Public bodies – such as care providers and hospitals – must pay better attention to the human rights of people in their care if they are to protect vulnerable adults and improve service standards.”

The council apologised to Steven Neary and his father Mark and said it had “let both of them down”.

Linda Sanders, the council’s director of social care, said: “As the judge has said in his findings, at all times my staff were genuinely committed to ensuring that we did the right thing for Stephen and had his best interests at heart.”

She said the council’s failings were “collective errors of judgement” and not the result of failures by individual staff members.

Sanders said the council had made “significant changes relevant to this case” and was reviewing its training for staff who “deal with the complex issues relating to the Mental Capacity Act and Deprivation of Liberty safeguards”.

9 June 2011

Share this post:

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on Reddit

Related

‘Muddled’ blue badge reforms ‘are to blame for renewal delays’
6th February 2015
UN debate will be reminder of true inclusive education
6th February 2015
IDS breaks pledge on PIP waiting-times, as tens of thousands still queue for months
30th January 2015

Primary Sidebar

Access

Latest Stories

ONS suggests NHS disability discrimination may have increased risk of COVID deaths

DWP records ‘show Tomlinson is either a liar or a fantasist’ over engagement claims

Audio recording option set to be introduced for all PIP assessments, says DWP

Tomlinson faces third angry letter from DPOs over ‘shambolic’ national disability survey

Guarded response to health and social care white paper

Campaigners seek urgent support for amendments to domestic abuse bill

Government’s pandemic failings have led to ‘bleak picture of marginalisation’

Secret report casts doubt on DWP’s ‘no duty of care’ claim

Disability Unit accused of ‘shameful manipulation’ over disability strategy note

Autistic activist tells MPs of ‘brutal… aggressive… sink or swim’ support system

Advice and Information

DWP: The case for the prosecution

Readspeaker

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web