• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / News Archive / Mobility component u-turn: Fears over how DWP will fund decision

Mobility component u-turn: Fears over how DWP will fund decision

By guest on 3rd December 2011 Category: News Archive

Listen

The government has refused to say how it will fund its decision to abandon plans to remove a key mobility benefit from disabled people in residential care.

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) said the move – announced today by the Conservative minister for disabled people, Maria Miller – would be funded through other measures in its welfare reform bill.

The plan to remove the mobility component of the personal independence payment (PIP) – the planned replacement for disability living allowance (DLA) – from 78, 000 people in state-funded residential care was one of the most controversial of the coalition’s package of welfare reforms.

But disability organisations now fear the £160 million the government hoped to save by introducing the mobility component measure will come from other cuts to spending on disability benefits, with DLA or PIP again particularly at risk.

Neil Coyle, director of policy for Disability Alliance (DA), said: “It is still a cut somewhere, even if 78,000 disabled people may now breathe a sigh of relief. It could mean further cuts for more disabled people somewhere else.”

DA has estimated that the government could fill the £160 million gap by removing funding from 157,000 people currently receiving the lower rate care component of DLA, which Coyle said would “fit with the government rhetoric on targeting PIP at disabled people with the highest needs”.

Anne McGuire, Labour’s shadow minister for disabled people, said she was also concerned about how the government would fill the funding gap.

She said: “We would now want to press the government to clarify how they are going to fund this important reverse on this particular proposal. It cannot be to the further detriment of disabled people.”

The DWP would only say that the measure would be funded “through our wider welfare reforms”.

1 December 2011

Share this post:

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on Reddit

Related

‘Muddled’ blue badge reforms ‘are to blame for renewal delays’
6th February 2015
UN debate will be reminder of true inclusive education
6th February 2015
IDS breaks pledge on PIP waiting-times, as tens of thousands still queue for months
30th January 2015

Primary Sidebar

Access

Latest Stories

New figures on COVID deaths of younger disabled people ‘show need for vaccine action’

Atos pays out for negligent PIP assessment after visit from debt enforcement officers

Budget’s double blow to disabled people

Treasury rejects delivery of last-ditch appeals for £20 uplift

Anger over disability survey’s ‘degrading’ and ‘insulting’ relationship question

DWP brands DNS ‘vexatious’ for seeking truth about impact of universal credit

Government questioned over ‘unforgivable’ failures on vaccine priority

Regulator fails to record key details from scheme sending COVID patients into care homes

‘Why did it take disabled man’s death to lead to rail safety action?’ campaigners ask

Ministers silent after sitting on report on discrimination in politics for more than a year

Advice and Information

DWP: The case for the prosecution

Readspeaker

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web