• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / Politics / Tory backing for domestic abuse amendment on care, despite government opposition
Baroness Campbell in front of a radiator and a painting on the wall

Tory backing for domestic abuse amendment on care, despite government opposition

By John Pring on 28th January 2021 Category: Politics

Listen

Two disabled peers have secured cross-party backing for their attempt to expand the protection offered to disabled people through the government’s domestic abuse bill.

Although the government is so far opposing the move by Baroness [Tanni] Grey-Thompson and Baroness [Jane] Campbell, their proposed amendment to the bill during its Lords committee stage secured support this week from at least five Tory peers.

The bill includes measures to create a wide-ranging statutory definition of domestic abuse, to establish a new domestic abuse commissioner, and to place a duty on local authorities in England to provide support to survivors of domestic abuse and their children in refuges and other safe accommodation.

The amendment by the two crossbench disabled peers would ensure that measures in the bill would cover not only those abused by family and partners, but also abuse by paid care workers and unpaid carers, such as friends or neighbours.

Baroness Campbell told fellow peers that the amendment followed “disabled people’s express plea that the bill should address the covert abuse that some individuals experience from a carer, whether paid or unpaid”.

She said: “While most who care for disabled people do so with great kindness, respect and the best intentions, there are a significant number who do not, and who go on to abuse those who rely on them.”

She said that care relationships were “sometimes exploited by the carer, leading to an abuse of power and pervasive means of coercive control” and that existing legal protections were “clearly not working”.

She said: “Many personal assistants [PAs] who are employed by disabled people – I have that ability through my own personal health budget – are not regulated.

“We do not come under safeguarding measures. We are alone, to manage and control our PAs ourselves; it is something that we choose to do.

“I would want to know that this legislation covered me if I ever found myself in a situation where my PA was abusing me.”

Lord Cormack, one of the Tory peers who supported Baroness Campbell’s amendment, said: “It is important that this landmark legislation is able to deal with abuse involving relationships between those who live in the same domestic setting or where there is a dependency within a domestic setting.”

He said that was why he supported Baroness Campbell, who he said had spoken “with great eloquence, force, lucidity and passion”.

He added: “What she said convinced me entirely.”

Two peers mentioned the work of disabled campaigner Ruth Bashall, chief executive of Stay Safe East – which works with disabled survivors of domestic and sexual abuse, hate crime and other forms of abuse – who has been lobbying for improvements to the bill.

Last June, she told Disability News Service (DNS) of four key amendments that would provide disabled people with crucial new protections, including the one put forward by Baroness Grey-Thompson and Baroness Campbell.

Despite the widespread support, the Tory whip, Lord [Stephen] Parkinson, said that their amendment – and other similar suggested improvements – would “broaden the definition of domestic abuse unhelpfully”.

He said: “This is a domestic abuse bill, not an abuse bill, which is why we do not believe that it would be appropriate for these sorts of relationships to be included within that definition.”

He said that suitable protection was already offered through other legislation, such as the Care Act, and organisations such as the Care Quality Commission and local safeguarding adult boards.

Baroness Campbell did not ask for a vote on the amendment, but she and Baroness Grey-Thompson told DNS that they would continue to push the government to change its position before the bill becomes law.

Picture: Baroness Campbell speaking from her home during the debate

 

A note from the editor:

Please consider making a voluntary financial contribution to support the work of DNS and allow it to continue producing independent, carefully-researched news stories that focus on the lives and rights of disabled people and their user-led organisations.

Please do not contribute if you cannot afford to do so, and please note that DNS is not a charity. It is run and owned by disabled journalist John Pring and has been from its launch in April 2009.

Thank you for anything you can do to support the work of DNS…

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter)Share on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on RedditShare on LinkedIn

Tags: Baroness Campbell Baroness Grey-Thompson domestic abuse domestic abuse bill Lord Cormack

A photograph shows an audience raising their hands in a BSL sign. The words say: 'BSL Conference 2025. The future starts with us. Leeds 17-18 July. Be part of shaping the future of Deaf cultures and identities. Get 10% off with BDA10'

Related

Disabled peers plan to ‘amend, amend, amend, amend, amend’ after assisted dying bill reaches Lords
26th June 2025
Disabled peers speak of ‘daily fight’ against access barriers in House of Lords
22nd May 2025
‘Sinister’ government analysis of assisted dying bill adds weight to fears of financial incentives for deaths
8th May 2025

Primary Sidebar

On the left of the image are multiple heads of different colours - white, aqua, red, light brown, and dark green - all grouped together, then the words ‘Campaign for Disability Justice. Sign up to support. #OpportunitySecurityRespect’
A photograph shows an audience raising their hands in a BSL sign. The words say: 'BSL Conference 2025. The future starts with us. Leeds 17-18 July. Be part of shaping the future of Deaf cultures and identities. Get 10% off with BDA10'

Access

Latest Stories

Government ignores warnings of new DWP deaths, and UN intervention, as MPs pass universal credit cuts bill

Urgent letter from UN to Labour government warns: We think your cuts continue Tory attack on disability rights

Race against time to secure DWP deaths evidence before parliament passes new benefit cuts bill

‘Complete shift in thinking’ needed on education of disabled children, says ALLFIE

Minister ignored concerns from disabled advisers, months before publishing cuts bill

Frustration after government only issues partial ban on new floating bus stops

Report suggests five big ideas that could transform disabled people’s mobility

My new book shows exactly why we need the disability movement, says disabled author

‘Disastrous’ cuts bill that leaves legacy of distrust and distress ‘must be dropped’

Four disabled Labour MPs stand up to government over cuts to disability benefits

Advice and Information

Readspeaker
A photograph shows an audience raising their hands in a BSL sign. The words say: 'BSL Conference 2025. The future starts with us. Leeds 17-18 July. Be part of shaping the future of Deaf cultures and identities. Get 10% off with BDA10'

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Threads
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2025 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web