• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / Benefits and Poverty / WCA reviewer tells MPs that DWP is ‘odd’ and ‘characterised by inertia’
Head and shoulders of Paul Litchfield

WCA reviewer tells MPs that DWP is ‘odd’ and ‘characterised by inertia’

By John Pring on 2nd December 2021 Category: Benefits and Poverty

Listen

The expert who was twice commissioned by the government to review the work capability assessment (WCA) has delivered a damning assessment of the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), in an evidence session with MPs.

Dr Paul Litchfield, who led the final two independent reviews of the WCA in 2013 and 2014, told members of the Commons work and pensions committee that the “operational” side of DWP had constantly resisted his ideas for improvements to the assessment.

He said that DWP was characterised by “inertia”, and that it was “odd” and “different to other civil service departments I have had contact with”.

He said he had found the department to be “co-operative” and “enthusiastic” at a policy level.

But he added: “I constantly got the impression from the operational side that it was all a bit of a nuisance and that when I made recommendations about ways that the process might be improved, it was always pushed back really quite quickly, saying, ‘oh, it’s not cost effective’ or ‘it’s impractical’, or ‘we’ll accept it in principle, provided…’”

He said it appeared that, seven years on, “things just haven’t been taken forward”.

Litchfield (pictured) said there had always been a “sucking of teeth” when recommendations reached the operational side of DWP.

He added: “I do wonder if they just wait out the things that they don’t really fancy doing, until a new lot come along.”

Litchfield said he had found in his first review that there was “systematic” bias in the way employment and support allowance (ESA) claims were handled by DWP, which led to “some odd decisions being made”, but that this had not been addressed.

He said that he believed there had not been “a lot of progress” in improving the WCA since he finished his final review in 2014, and that there had been no improvement that he could see in how fair people believed the assessment was, when comparing the situation before and after his reviews.

Litchfield also said he believed there needed to be another independent review of the WCA, seven years after the last one reported.

He said the assessment process was currently based on thinking that was developed “40 or 50 years ago”.

And he suggested that the government should develop a new assessment, which he said should be based on the – widely discredited – biopsychosocial (BPS) model of disability.

But academics and activists have argued that the WCA was already based on the BPS model and that this model was also used to justify the post-2010 decisions by the coalition and subsequent Tory government to cut spending on disability benefits.

Three disabled researchers in 2016 found that the biopsychosocial model did “not represent evidence-based policy” and was riddled with inconsistencies, misleading statements and “unevidenced” claims.

Key to the BPS model, the authors said in 2016, was the idea that “it is the negative attitudes of many ESA recipients that prevent them from working, rather than their impairment or health condition”, essentially branding many benefit claimants “scroungers”.

They said this allowed supporters of BPS – including a string of Tory and pre-2010 Labour government ministers – to draw a distinction “between ‘real’ incapacity benefit claimants, with long-term and incurable health conditions, and ‘fake’ benefit claimants, with short-term illness”, with the model responsible for a “barely concealed” element of “victim-blaming”.

 

A note from the editor:

Please consider making a voluntary financial contribution to support the work of DNS and allow it to continue producing independent, carefully-researched news stories that focus on the lives and rights of disabled people and their user-led organisations.

Please do not contribute if you cannot afford to do so, and please note that DNS is not a charity. It is run and owned by disabled journalist John Pring and has been from its launch in April 2009.

Thank you for anything you can do to support the work of DNS…

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter)Share on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on RedditShare on LinkedIn

Tags: biopsychosocial DWP ESA Paul Litchfield wca work and pensions committee

A photograph shows an audience raising their hands in a BSL sign. The words say: 'BSL Conference 2025. The future starts with us. Leeds 17-18 July. Be part of shaping the future of Deaf cultures and identities. Get 10% off with BDA10'

Related

Minister finally admits that working-age benefits spending is stable, despite months of ‘spiralling’ claims
26th June 2025
Timms says cuts must go ahead, despite being reminded of risk that disabled claimants could die
26th June 2025
Timms misleads MPs on DWP transparency and cover-ups, as he gives evidence on PIP review
26th June 2025

Primary Sidebar

On the left of the image are multiple heads of different colours - white, aqua, red, light brown, and dark green - all grouped together, then the words ‘Campaign for Disability Justice. Sign up to support. #OpportunitySecurityRespect’
A photograph shows an audience raising their hands in a BSL sign. The words say: 'BSL Conference 2025. The future starts with us. Leeds 17-18 July. Be part of shaping the future of Deaf cultures and identities. Get 10% off with BDA10'

Access

Latest Stories

Disabled MP who quit government over benefit cuts tells DNS: ‘The consequences will be devastating’

Disabled peers plan to ‘amend, amend, amend, amend, amend’ after assisted dying bill reaches Lords

Minister finally admits that working-age benefits spending is stable, despite months of ‘spiralling’ claims

This bill opens the door to scandal, abuse and injustice, disabled activists say after assisted dying bill vote

Timms says cuts must go ahead, despite being reminded of risk that disabled claimants could die

Absence of disabled people’s voices from assisted dying bill has been ‘astonishing’, says disabled MP

Timms misleads MPs on DWP transparency and cover-ups, as he gives evidence on PIP review

Ministers are considering further extension to disability hate crime laws, after pledge on ‘aggravated’ offences

Making all self-driving pilot schemes accessible would be ‘counter-productive’ and slow us down, says minister

Involve disabled people ‘meaningfully’ from the start when developing digital assistive tech, says report

Advice and Information

Readspeaker
A photograph shows an audience raising their hands in a BSL sign. The words say: 'BSL Conference 2025. The future starts with us. Leeds 17-18 July. Be part of shaping the future of Deaf cultures and identities. Get 10% off with BDA10'

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Threads
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2025 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web