• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / Politics / We don’t care if our disability ambassadors are disabled, government admits
Separate head and shoulders pictures of David Buxton and Mik Scarlet

We don’t care if our disability ambassadors are disabled, government admits

By John Pring on 4th May 2023 Category: Politics

Listen

The Cabinet Office has admitted that it does not ask its own disability ambassadors if they self-identify as disabled people, sparking serious concerns about the government’s commitment to equality.

The government now has 20 disability and access ambassadors across areas such as advertising, arts and culture, banking, energy, housing, recruitment, retail and tourism.

The ambassadors are supposed to “drive improvements in the accessibility and quality of services and facilities in their sector for disabled people”.

But only a small number of the 20 ambassadors have publicly self-identified as disabled people, including Caroline Eglinton, head of inclusion for East West Rail, who covers rail travel, Claire Walters, the long-serving chief executive of Bus Users UK, for buses, and countryside access champion Debbie North, founder of Access the Dales.

The government’s heavily-criticised National Disability Strategy – later declared unlawful by the high court – claimed that the government wanted to “help ensure disabled people can play a full role in society” and “remove barriers to participation in public life”.

But evidence available online suggests that most of its own disability and access ambassadors are not themselves disabled people.

Disability News Service asked the Cabinet Office in a freedom of information request how many of the ambassadors identified as disabled people, and how many declined to provide that information when applying for the roles.

The government department replied: “Thank you for your request regarding the self-identification of the Disability and Access Ambassadors as disabled.

“This information is neither sought nor collected.”

Mik Scarlet, co-chief executive of the charity Phab and a freelance access advisor, said he believed the ambassador roles should only be open to disabled people.

He said the government “keeps missing the open goal of getting inclusion right” and that the appointments were “a missed opportunity”.

He said: “After the minister for disabled people going on a benefits fraud raid, reinforcing the stereotype that fraud in so-called disability benefits is rife while doing very little to visibly work for better inclusion and accessibility, we see that the people the government are working with to further these goals might not be disabled themselves.

“To load a group of ‘experts’ on disability with any non-disabled people highlights how out-of-touch the government is with the desires of disabled people and the current thinking around best practice.

“Of course, there is a need for experts in other areas to advise the panel, but they should be brought in when the advice is required. The ambassadors themselves should only be disabled people.

“There are enough talented, knowledgeable disabled experts out there who would be able to give the government advice that combined learned experience with lived experience.

“This is another misunderstanding of the Equality Act and what it asks around recruitment.

“A fear of the right-wing press shouting discrimination has led to disabled voices being excluded from playing a constructive part in building a better, more inclusive society.”

He added: “I think we’re seeing business and the private sector really getting that disabled experts should be leading the move towards inclusive design and practice, but government is just not getting it.”

David Buxton, chief executive of the London-based disabled people’s organisation Action on Disability, said he was “gravely concerned” that some of the ambassadors were not disabled people.

He said that Deaf and disabled people “face everyday barriers in life” and “by using their own experience and skills to influence change for a better, more inclusive and accessible society, we will all participate and contribute as equal and valued citizens and consumers”.

He said it was essential that recruiting for such roles included a declaration of whether the candidate is a disabled person and a description of the barriers they experience.

Buxton said that non-disabled experts should still be valued as “key strategic partners, to drive and support disabled leaders”.

DNS contacted several ambassadors about the Cabinet Office freedom of information response, but none of them had commented by noon today (Thursday).

The Cabinet Office’s Equality Hub had also failed to comment by noon today.

Picture: David Buxton (above left) and Mik Scarlet

 

A note from the editor:

Please consider making a voluntary financial contribution to support the work of DNS and allow it to continue producing independent, carefully-researched news stories that focus on the lives and rights of disabled people and their user-led organisations.

Please do not contribute if you cannot afford to do so, and please note that DNS is not a charity. It is run and owned by disabled journalist John Pring and has been from its launch in April 2009.

Thank you for anything you can do to support the work of DNS…

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter)Share on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on Reddit

Tags: Cabinet Office David Buxton Disability disability ambassadors disability equality Mik Scarlet

Pygmalion at the Old Vic. Access performances. Icons for audio description, captioned, BSL and relaxed performances.

Related

Government side-stepping UN examination ‘shows contempt for disabled people’
17th August 2023
Cabinet Office silent on blackout reports because of ‘national security’
8th December 2022
Labour’s broken promise could see it finally face legal action over years of discrimination
1st December 2022

Primary Sidebar

Pygmalion at the Old Vic. Access performances. Icons for audio description, captioned, BSL and relaxed performances.

Access

Latest Stories

Network Rail admits: ‘We have no idea how many inaccessible bridges we’re building’

Anger as Labour omits ‘vital’ promise on disability rights from policy document

Labour has ‘caved in to vested interests’ on social care, leaked documents show

Fear over council policy that could force disabled people into care homes

Anger at ‘shameful’ failure to include DWP deaths inquiry in Labour policy document

One in three ‘Disability Confident’ employers have employed no disabled people

Austerity changes are reducing impact of accessible housing funds, 12 years on

Ministers ignore ESA claimants in suicide prevention strategy… again

Watchdog appears set to approve mass ticket office closures

Disabled politician sues Lib Dems over discrimination that left her suicidal

Advice and Information

Readspeaker

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2023 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web