PIP review ignores evidence of dishonesty among Atos and Capita assessors

44

The former civil servant commissioned by the government to review its new disability benefit has refused to accept there is any dishonesty among the healthcare professionals who carry out assessments, despite being shown significant evidence of wrongdoing.

Disability News Service (DNS) has twice contacted Paul Gray’s personal independence payment (PIP) review team with evidence collected during a lengthy investigation into allegations of widespread dishonesty by assessors working for the outsourcing giants Capita and Atos.

But in his second and final review of PIP for the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), published seven days ago, Gray dismisses any suggestions of dishonesty.

Although he says in the review that some claimants “assert that the Health Professional has misinterpreted or even deliberately misrepresented what was discussed during the assessment”, he says there could be several explanations for this other than dishonesty.

He suggests instead that PIP claimants may hold these beliefs because the assessor: failed to mention evidence they had provided, made “inappropriate assumptions” about the impact of their condition, or “may genuinely have made an error when transcribing their notes”.

In early February, DNS passed on detailed evidence to Gray’s review team, which included excerpts from more than 40 cases in which PIP claimants had alleged clear dishonesty by healthcare assessors in the way they had written their assessment reports.

The claimants spoke repeatedly of dishonesty, “fraudulent conduct” and “lie after lie after lie” told by assessors in their reports, on which DWP decision-makers based their decisions on their eligibility for PIP.

DNS then contacted the review team two weeks later, with further evidence of widespread wrongdoing, including a news story which described how the investigation had by that time collected more than 100 cases of alleged dishonesty.

None of that information has been included in Gray’s review.

The position taken by Gray, who also chairs DWP’s benefits advice body, the social security advisory committee, mirrors that of the department itself, which has consistently stated that it does not believe there has been any dishonesty by its assessors.

Asked by DNS about the dismissal of any suggestions of dishonesty, Gray said in a statement that the review’s role was “to make an assessment of how PIP assessments as a whole are operating, not to investigate individual cases or complaints.

“The Review does though emphasise that the assessment process should be more transparent to help improve claimant trust in the system.”

He refused to comment further.

Elsewhere in his report, Gray says public trust in the “fairness and consistency” of PIP decisions was “not currently being achieved, with high levels of disputed award decisions, many of them overturned at appeal”.

He is also critical of DWP’s new mandatory reconsideration process, the internal process that all claimants have to go through before appealing to an independent tribunal.

He says in his report that tribunal judges are “sceptical about the thoroughness of the Mandatory Reconsideration process”.

He adds: “Furthermore, currently 65 per cent of appeal hearings overturn the initial decision which is clearly eroding the trust of claimants and stakeholders in the system.”

Gray says progress made by DWP to improve PIP since his first review in 2014 has been “mixed”, with implementation of his recommendations “either incomplete or slower than the Review had hoped in many areas”.

He adds: “Professionals and organisations were asked to comment on progress since the first Review. The majority of feedback regarding this was negative.”

In a further blow to the credibility of ministers, he says that tribunal judges told the review that “rather than further written evidence, it is cogent oral evidence from the claimant at the hearing that is by far their most common reason for overturning decisions”.

Ministers and Tory MPs – including former disabled people’s minister Justin Tomlinson last week – have repeatedly claimed that the main reason for successful appeals was claimants producing fresh written evidence at their tribunals.

Gray also warns that he had been concerned to see that some assessors appeared to assume that if a claimant had a job this was evidence “of limited functional impairment”.

In his recommendations, he says he hopes that DWP “re-emphasises and ensures that employment will not disadvantage claimants when they seek to claim PIP and explores ways in which PIP may be an enabler in improving employment retention”.

Among Gray’s other recommendations, he suggests DWP should introduce audio recording of assessments to increase claimant confidence, as long as there is an opt-out option.

But there are likely to be concerns over another of Gray’s recommendations, that the responsibility for ensuring that further evidence is gathered should “primarily sit with the claimant” rather than DWP or the assessor.

He made the recommendation even though more than 87 per cent of the professionals and organisations who responded to the question, following his appeal for evidence, believed claimants faced barriers to providing further evidence.

Disabled activists, coroners and Scotland’s Mental Welfare Commission have all linked the failure to secure the necessary further evidence with the deaths of claimants of the out-of-work sickness and disability benefit, employment and support allowance (ESA).

A legal case backed by the Mental Health Resistance Network resulted in the upper tribunal administrative appeals chamber ruling that the ESA assessment process discriminated against some disabled people with mental health conditions and learning difficulties.

Asked about his recommendation on further evidence, Gray said in a statement: “As the review makes clear, the department should make a concerted effort to improve communication products to ensure accessibility and ensure that PIP claimants understand what evidence should be provided.

“The review advises this should be done before the department emphasises that the primary responsibility for collecting evidence rests with the claimant.

“The review also emphasises that, although the primary responsibility for evidence provision should rest with the claimant, the department and providers should make use of evidence they hold elsewhere in the benefits system and should also follow up evidence leads that emerge during the claim process.”

When asked whether he was aware of the Mental Health Resistance Network WCA appeal ruling, and the links between the failure to secure further evidence for ESA claims and the deaths of claimants, he again refused to comment further.

In a written statement, published on the last day before MPs began their Easter recess, Penny Mordaunt, minister for disabled people, said the government welcomed the review’s publication “and will consider its findings and issue a detailed response in due course”.

Meanwhile, a petition on the UK parliament website which calls for all PIP and ESA assessments to be video-recorded because of the “errors and false or inaccurate statements” made in their reports by healthcare professionals, has reached more than 3,000 signatures.

The petition, created by Sharon Ann Smith, says that a video recording of the assessment “would assist claimants, the DWP and appeals panels by giving an indisputable record of the assessment”.

0%
0%
  • User Ratings (22 Votes)
    7.2
Share.

44 Comments

  1. jenni ambler on

    I
    had my pip assessment today was terrified as they removed my dla a few
    weeks ago. I was there for two hours the lady was so thorough and can
    honestly say the nicest most caring assessor she could have been. She
    made the whole process so easy and relaxing. Hopefully the results will
    be as positive.

    • louise hunter on

      I hope you get all the help you deserve and get awarded the correct amount but I must warn you they do come across as the nicest people in the world but its when you see the lies they have written about you and thinks they “forget” to write down and the low points most get awarded (its only then you realise)

    • My assessor was nice and polite, but when the report came back, it was filled with lies, literally from beginning to end. I’m sorry to say that the same thing will probably happen to you.

      • jenni ambler on

        If you cant say anything positive then dont reply to me in such a cursing way, you have no idea what will happen to me I do not appreciate your negative words just because it happened to you. Perhaps your negativity brought it upon yourself, until I get my result I prefer to stay positive, if as and when I will deal with the out come.

        • Excuse me? What are you talking about? I was on your side. Louise Hunter said virtually the same thing to you and you said nothing. Also where is the cursing? The only one being nasty here is you. Makes me think you work for the DWP. I wonder. With such an unwarranted outburst I wouldn’t be surprised.

          • jenni ambler on

            I’m sorry to say that the same thing will probably happen to you………how is that being on my side? Thats you cursing me to follow your experience!!! Yes blow it all up I now am a spy for the dwp lol you are saying far more about yourself and your negative thinking than about me lol you are a joke. Oh and as for Louise you may read it as saying the same I didn’t

          • Esther Jane Dicks on

            Jenni, with respect, you’re overreacting. Morlock2000 is only being realistic. That’s not cursing you, it’s forewarning you, preparing you. Forewarned is forearmed. I know it’s upsetting, the whole process is, but lashing out at those who are trying to be supportive doesn’t help anyone. Name calling serves no purpose here when everyone is facing the same discrimination from assessors.

          • jenni ambler on

            You know nothing about me, my experience or my knowledge of dwp. No body should assume I or anyone is asking for advice or forewarning. I know exactly what I am up against, I know their way of working and the scams they pull, after 10 years indefinite highest awards I lost the lot in 7 days including my car. So negative warnings are no help at all, even you assume I know nothing and need forwarning, get over yourselves none of you are experts or have the answers so stop assuming you know better, you dont. As for name calling lol make it up as you go along why dont you, Im not lashing out Im telling the truth and busybodies dont like it. All I did was share the experience of my assessment, I didnt ask for all this!!!!

          • Esther Jane Dicks on

            ‘You’re a joke’ is name calling. Try not to be so aggressive. The aggression is all I know about you because it’s all you’ve evidenced so far. You’re clearly angry at a response that you have interpreted to be an attack when it wasn’t. At no point have I, or anyone here, made assumptions about you. You ARE lashing out. No one is being a busybody, they are just saying that the assessors can be nasty. If you don’t want comments, don’t post. All we have been is supportive and you tell us to get over ourselves. Your attitude stinks. Still, I hope you get the results you want. If you don’t, good luck getting support again.

          • jenni ambler on

            Ok you’re right, you know me better than I know myself, you know everything and have the ability to judge and be right about all things. Congratulations on being so perfect and for sharing your abilities with me. Feel better now? Feel bigger and more important? Thank you for spending so much time on one you value so little. Obviously its your lifes calling to travel around correcting the wrongs of strangers, what a calling.

    • Wolves in sheep’s clothing mine too was lovely even gave me a hug when she left saying I had nothing to worry about 3 weeks later lost all my pip sorry to be negative but it happens ALOT

      • jenni ambler on

        I hope you are fighting the results but its not always the assessor its the final decision maker, hope you win if you are fighting it.

        • These reports are largely written BEFORE you attend the F2F assessment. Judging by the similarity between so many cases that I have seen (so far) the face to face is really a waste of time, there merely to add the odd comment to dress up their position and suggest that they know a little more about you as a claimant.

      • Aye, my first assessor for PIP said “I know how painful your condition is, so I won’t make you go through a physical exam”. Then wrote that I refused it!!

  2. Esther Jane Dicks on

    I don’t understand how they’re able to dismiss these claims. The Panorama investigation filmed ages ago showed the endemic corruption within the system, not only supported by Atos and Capita, but actively encouraged. Workers bragged about how they were financially rewarded for rejecting claims. Has this investigation been forgotten? The evidence is there and yet the government seem to be wilfully ignoring it. Isn’t it a virtual impossibility that there are this many ‘mistakes?’ At the very least assessors need better training so that the ‘misjudgements’ and ‘assumptions’ can be stopped. But no, instead the government ignores the UN.

    • >I don’t understand how they’re able to dismiss these claims

      Easy to understand if you look behind the curtain…

      Paul Gray –
      “His former roles include:
      Executive Chairman, HM Revenue & Customs
      Second Permanent Secretary, ***Department for Work and Pensions***
      economic affairs private secretary to the ***Prime Minister***”

      The Social Security Advisory Committee members are as follows: –

      Rachael Badger –
      “Rachael Badger is part of the Finance and Transformation team at Citizens Advice
      (Bribed, Course of Justice Perverting, Abusing, Criminal, Fraudsters)
      Between 2003 and 2013, Rachael was a civil servant and had a variety of roles within ***the Department for Work and Pensions****”

      Liz Sayce OBE –
      Liz is Chief Executive of Disability Rights UK,

      I’ll say that nonce sickos name again –

      LIZ SAYCE OBE
      *******Liz is …. CHIEF EXECUTIVE of DISABILITY RIGHTS UK*******

      Clearly it Perverts the Course of Justice and Assists Murdering Criminal Abusers through it’s membership of the Social Security Advisory Committee…. and it’s DISABILITY RIGHTS UK dayjob.

      “previous roles include Director of Policy and Communications at the Disability Rights Commission and Policy Director of Mind. She led an Independent Review into disability employment programmes for government in 2011 and has published widely on mental health, disability and social participation.”

      Bruce Calderwood –
      “Bruce Calderwood …was for many years a senior official in ***DWP*** …
      He ended his civil service career as the director in the Department of Health responsible for policy on mental health, disability and equality.(ROFLMAO)
      In this role he led the team which created the 2010 to 2015 coalition government’s mental health strategy”

      Carl Emmerson –
      “Carl,,, has previously served as a specialist adviser to the House of Commons Work and Pensions Select Committee.”

      Colin Godbold –
      Perverts the Course of Justice and Assists Murdering Criminal Abusers through it’s membership of the Social Security Advisory Committee.

      Chris Goulden –
      “Chris Goulden… Chris Goulden is Deputy Director of Policy and Research at the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
      … is a former social researcher at the Home Office and Cabinet Office.”

      Dr Jim McCormick –
      “Dr Jim McCormick is the Scotland member of the Social Security Advisory Committee. He is Associate Director for Scotland with the Joseph Rowntree Foundation”
      and Perverts the Course of Justice and Assists Murdering Criminal Abusers through it’s membership of the Social Security Advisory Committee.

      Gráinne McKeever –
      “Gráinne McKeever is an executive director and former chair of the Law Centre, Northern Ireland, a not-for-profit specialist advice organisation. She is a Professor of Law and Social Justice at Ulster University and has published widely in the areas of social security law and access to justice. She is the assistant editor of the Journal of Social Security Law and currently teaches social security law and policy to undergraduate and postgraduate law students. Gráinne is the director of Ulster University’s Law Clinic, through which postgraduate law students provide social security advocacy for members of the public.”

      but the vile lowlfe sicko has never ever ever ever heard of The Fraud Act 2006, Murder, Misconduct in Public Office, Vulnerable Adult Abuse or The Police…. But clearly knows all about The Bribery Act 2010 and Perverting The Course of Justice (How To).

      Dominic Morris –
      “Dom has advised senior decision makers and military commanders in strategy and change management on welfare’s frontline and in war zones.”
      an expert in ‘professional’ Murder.
      It Perverts the Course of Justice and Assists Murdering Criminal Abusers through it’s membership of the Social Security Advisory Committee.

      Seyi Obakin OBE –
      Seyi Obakin OBE is the Chief Executive of Centrepoint (any ‘human’ knows how lowlife that fake charity is).

      Judith Paterson –
      “Judith Paterson has worked in the field of social security law and advice for more than 25 years and is currently leading a Scotland-wide, second tier welfare rights service for the Child Poverty Action Group in Scotland. Her work involves contributing to social policy work and analysing legislation and issues arising from casework for their impact on individuals, families and services.”
      but the vile lowlfe sicko has never ever ever ever heard of The Fraud Act 2006, Murder, Misconduct in Public Office, Vulnerable Adult Abuse or The Police…. But clearly knows all about The Bribery Act 2010 and Perverting The Course of Justice (How To).

      Charlotte Pickles –
      “Charlotte (Charlie) is Deputy Director and Head of Research at the Reform think tank. She was an expert adviser to the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions during the 2010 to 2015 coalition government.” (IAN Duncan F*****G SMITH)
      (Charlie) bit OFF my finger.

      Victoria Todd –
      It Perverts the Course of Justice and Assists Murdering Criminal Abusers through it’s membership of the Social Security Advisory Committee.

      • Michael Parkins on

        Hi,
        I have made the same information available on a patient blog, many times.
        It is a lovely merry go round of cronyism that has been set up to keep ex ministers and charity heads etc in a nice comfortable living. It’s like the police policing themselves, I can’t see any way that these committees are impartial.
        Mike.

        • True Mike.
          Ex-DWP criminal abusers doing something about DWP crime would be like turkeys voting for Xmas.

          Who is going to head their latest child abuse inquiry? Dig up Jimmy Savile?

          And what else can you say about shameless scumbags Disability Rights UK.

          Anyway… thank to DNS for not deleting my comment.. this time… yet…
          .

        • And I just found this site –
          capitalocalgovernment DOT co DOT uk
          (!)
          Now you know why Local Council Social Services criminal abusers won’t do anything about DWP/WCA sickos.
          (Care Act 2014 – Section 42)

          This is pretty stunning too….

          CAPITA is doing NON-CONSENSUAL “behavioural science” “experiment” on housing benefit claimants.

          capitalocalgovernment DOT co DOT uk/case-studies/reducing-fraud-and-error-through-nudge-techniques/

          They say ‘nudge’ but mean PUNCH.
          .

      • Thankyou Esther…

        But look now… “This comment was deleted.”

        Did you know that Fake News Criminals ‘Disability News Service’ is part FUNDED by the DWP’s Disability Rights UK.
        (Search this site for DNS’s “About Us” page.)

        DNS (John Pring) won’t report the “evidence” he claims to have to the Police.

        DNS doesn’t want you knowing that his employers Disability Rights UK are on Ex-DWP criminal Paul Gray’s Social Security Advisory Committee.

        DNS will never publish anything but harmless hot air.
        google –
        Assisting an Offender
        and
        Perverting the Course of Justice

        Yes. Knowledge IS power!

        • Just to let you know that thanks in particular to your comments on Disqus, I am going to close it down in the next few days. Every time you make a comment like this it has a significant impact on my mental health. And no, I’m not going to explain my editorial decisions to an anonymous troll. My body of work – including stories criticising DR UK – over the last eight years will stand for themselves.

          • Vile Passive Aggression

            What sort of “impact” on MY mental health do you think that your false accusation emails of me being “Highly Libelous” just for stating provable FACTS about Jeremy Corbyn and his gang of criminal abusers has had.

            When are you going to report ANY of the “evidence” you claim to have to the police? And which bit of *Perverting The Course Of Justice* are you still pretending to not understand?

            What sort of “impact” on OTHER PEOPLES mental health do you think that your support for criminal abusers has? Still just counting your cash?

            You get cash from the LABOUR ATOS Welsh Government via their ‘Front’ Disability Wales.
            You get cash from DWP ‘front’ Disability Rights UK. their corruption is easy to find in their Charity Commission accounts.

            This has NOTHING to do with your ahem ‘health’ and EVERYTHING to do with FAKE NEWS for LOCAL AND GENERAL ELECTIONS.

            >anonymous troll
            LIAR.
            You know my email address and my NAME.
            And here is the latest from some of your Atos-Labour Party filth –

            phobosanddeimos DOT net/we-know-where-you-live/

            yes… I actually PUBLISH evidence.

            Three new posts to go up next week…
            Including your email criminal intimidation.

            screenshot (more evidence)

          • And if you ever provide any proper evidence about Atos providing funding to a political party, you can be damn sure I will publish it. As you know, I have probably published more news stories criticising Atos than any journalist in the country.

  3. IsabellaThomas on

    My son is Autistic and has complex medical needs. He had DLA for life until he went over to PIP. They have given him PIP for eight years on enhanced rate but he only got 4 points for mobility which means he has lost his blue badge which he has had since he was five years old. This points system is crazy as it does not take into consideration the needs of someone who has mental health problems as well as Autism. My son is under two specialist hospitals in London and we have to travel from Somerset. He cannot get on a train or use the underground very well because of his problems especially his severe OCD. I take him up in the car where he likes the window open most of the time as he feels he can breath better. He has his music on in the car and won’t were ear plugs. Now there is a major problem because I cannot take him to his appointments because his blue badge runs out on the 8th April. We need this badge to park outside of the hospitals. We need his badge every time we travel. I don’t know what to do?

  4. Amanda Napthine on

    My ATOS “health care professional” made lots of comments that could – just about – be considered misinterpretation, but she also told some outright lies: she said I refused a physical examination, when in truth, I wasn’t asked to take one, and she claimed I don’t take anti-depressants, despite evidence to the contrary. Without recordings, there’s no way to prove the first, but what about the medication? How can anyone say they don’t lie when there is proof that they do? This falsehood has dogged my application because no matter how many times I produce evidence, the decision makers just ignore it “preferring the evidence” of the assessor to actual medical evidence. The reconsideration even had “Does not take antidepressants!!” on it (yes, with the double exclamation marks). The lower tier tribunal said they would take a fresh look at it and not rely on ATOS evidence, yet the statement of reasons for denying an award still said I don’t take anti-depressants. The lower tier denied leave to appeal to the upper tier despite glaring errors in law, so I’ve now applied to the upper tier directly and am waiting to hear. The whole system is geared, not to get people the help they need, but to pay out as little as possible whilst awarding themselves huge bonuses and pensions.

    • Their BS ‘upper tier’ tribunals can only be about ‘points of law’, right?

      Mainly
      google – Fraud Act 2006
      click on the – legislation DOT gov link
      and read sections –
      2.Fraud by false representation
      3.Fraud by failing to disclose information
      4.Fraud by abuse of position
      (up to Ten years in Prison for those)

      ATOS criminal quacks also count for ‘Misconduct in Public Office’
      google – Misconduct in Public Office
      click on the – cps DOT gov link
      quote –
      “Examples of behaviour that have in the past fallen within the offence include:
      wilful excesses of official authority;
      ‘malicious’ exercises of official authority;
      wilful neglect of a public duty;
      intentional infliction of bodily harm, imprisonment, or other injury upon a person;
      **frauds and deceits**
      (up to LIFE in Prison for those)

      Unqualified quack fraudsters calling themselves “health care professional” who don’t tell you (or the DWP in their BS reports) that they are NOT medical doctors are breaking –
      Medical Act 1983 –
      See Sections 49 and 49A
      “Penalty for pretending to be registered”
      “Penalty for pretending to hold a licence to practise”
      And of course that’s more Fraud and Misconduct in Public Office.

      And all of that is criminal ‘Vulnerable Adult Abuse’ –
      google – Care Act 2014
      click on the – legislation DOT gov link
      Read Section 42 –
      “Safeguarding adults at risk of abuse or neglect”

      And if the DWP’s tribunal doesn’t report all of that crime to the police then –
      google – Perverting The Course of Justice
      click on the – cps DOT gov link
      (up to LIFE in Prison for that)

      And report all of the Criminal Vulnerable Adult Abusing Nonces to the Police.
      .

  5. It is becoming quite evident that ATOS and Capita are paying bonuses to their ” Disability Advisors” for every claim that they downgrade or reject. The question is , how long will it be before the Government wakes up and accepts that DWP may well be complicit. We all now know that ATOS and Capita have presented false evidence so many, many times that it is blatantly obvious that the dishonesty is in fact institutional. It is time to start sending these people to goal.

  6. Chas Robinson on

    The DWP are quite aware of what atos and capita are doing. How would they manage to reduce the disability expenditure if they were honest.

  7. I had to have an assessment a few years ago and arrived 30mins before my appointment and the “doctor” was sat in the reception when I arrived, I was made to wait until my appointment time even though no-one else was in the waiting area. I was called in to the room, no doors were held open even though she could see it was struggling but didn’t help… I had to have a physical examination and I asked to use the foot stool to get on the bed and I asked for help getting off the bed she naffed off into the other room so I was left struggling….. I lost my entitlement so I appealed against the decision is asked for a copy of the report and it was full of lies and none of the problems I had that day was in the report….. I WON my appeal… ATOS to me are flawed and useless at everything they do

      • Nina, the door was automatic so they couldn’t have used that excuse. The reason I lost my claim was the fact I got to the assessment by myself, I didn’t have anyone to take me, I don’t drive and I know that they wouldn’t have paid for a taxi to get me there and that was a question I asked in the appeal the judge agreed that they wouldn’t have paid for a taxi as it would’ve cost a lot more money which you don’t get back straight away..

  8. IsabellaThomas on

    I will apply but am told they are refusing Autistic people and using the same criteria as PIP now.

    • I wasn’t on PIP when I applied for a concessionary travel pass from my council… ask your GP to write a strongly worded letter.

  9. Edinburgh, SCOTLAND HERE !
    ——————————————-
    Here is my take on ill health here in Scotland.

    There is plenty of support and encouragement from independent and private organisations for those with mental and physical health problems… BUT then when we are directed towards the DWP for the assistance we DESERVE or NEED, we don’t get it.

    There is a huge conflict here right now in the UK.

    On one side we are told, “hey its ok to have MENTAL HEALTH problems, lets all talk about it, lets END the stigma” … then fracking PIP and ATOS START GASLIGHTING all the CLAIMANTS!

    What the HELL is going on?

    This is a time bomb of HATE for the system and its being detonated little by little.
    People who worked hard, paid there taxes and lived normal all of a sudden find themselves ill and they perhaps need a foot up in the form of ESA and PIP.. and they dont get it!

    People who may have been ill or disabled in some way all of their lives find themselves in need of a little extra cash to alleviate their suffering and make life that bit more bearable… and THEY DON’T GET IT!

    …well those same people live poorly everyday, they only have money for essentials and most weeks can’t even budget enough FOR DAMN FOOD! … let alone enjoying some little treats like cinema, a cafe outing, a bus ride out to the country parks!

    Well a hatred for the UK festers in their hearts, they see their life as useless, hopeless, pointless and then they start to see where the blame lies.. if only they had a little extra money so they could enjoy life a little while THEY ARE SICK ! … but no, they are left to ROT.

    How can a person improve their health, if they are constantly worrying, stressing, doing nothing, not interacting, not enjoying or participating in life because they have NO EXTRA MONEY ?

    – the answer is, they CANT ! … they get sicker, they lean more on the NHS, more medications, more treatments … which leads me to believe that this is all part of a sick deceptive PLAN.

    To boost and keep the ‘Fourth Sector’ ALIVE ! …more psychiatrists, more social workers, more care homes, more health assessors… it is the fastest growing economy ever..since always… and it never ENDS.

    Ever been ill for years and you feel like you are in a VICIOUS CYCLE, it just never stops… you get no straight answers… all the while things only get worse and you start to think there is only one way out – death ! … well that is where I AM – It is a human cull …and they cannot deny it.

    I hate the UK, I hate Scotland, I hate society … why? because I am ill and I am struggling to live comfortably and I am suffering everyday, and the only people who care are being paid TO.

  10. >the less I trust media in general.
    True… eg…
    google – ATOS BBC
    What ever you might think of Donald Trump he’s right about that ‘Fake News’ organisation.

    The sponsors of the Channel 4 Paralympic coverage Allianz are Maximus shareholders… ‘Yes You Can’.. fit for work. :/

    Try posting a comment on most ‘media’ sites or ‘Campaign’ group sites or ‘Political’ sites or ‘Charity’ sites…. with a link to The Fraud Act 2006 or The Equality Act 2010 or The Care Act 2014 or Misconduct in Public Office etc etc and see just how rapidly your comment gets deleted.

    >it’s hard to find out what’s happening behind the scenes
    Googling keywords is useful – eg
    google –
    Corbyn PCS DWP
    maybe then add – ATOS Maximus – too.
    :/

    For ‘Charities’ their basic accounts are online at the Charities Commission website… eg..
    Checkout your local Citizens Advice Bureau to see where those ahem… “Independent and Impartial” *bleeps* get their cash from. Mine is getting cash directly from the DWP. As has their ‘National Association of CAB’s’
    :/

    Personally I’m not bothered about book selling or advertising… but getting paid by ‘fronts’ for the DWP/Maximus (Disability Rights UK) and for the Labour run ATOS Welsh Government (Disability Wales)… Well… read The Bribery Act 2010.

    google –
    ATOS Welsh Government
    ATOS Scottish Government
    ATOS London Mayor
    :/
    .

  11. >and was worsening under the pressures of JSA at the time
    >during which time I developed depression, attempted to take my life once

    Difficult to do this comment without being able to add direct links but here goes…

    google –
    cps offences against the person abh gbh
    and
    cps Homicide Murder Manslaughter
    and
    Criminal Attempts Act 1981
    and
    cps Misconduct in Public Office
    and
    Fraud Act 2006
    and
    Malicious Communications Act
    and
    Theft Act 1968 – Section 21 – Blackmail
    and
    Disability Hate Crime – CPS Legal Guidance
    and
    Care Act 2014 – section 42

    I’ve just got yet another ESA50 too (the EIGHTH in < 8 years).

    And again, in the section where they ask
    "Tell us about any other help you might need in the space below"
    I will yet again put something like –

    "Please provide enough Police to arrest all of you criminal, Vulnerable Adult Abusing, pseudoscience, quack, fraudsters."
    .

  12. >the less I trust media in general.
    True… eg… Especially when they delete comments like this one
    (I’m adding it again)

    Nothing but provable FACTS here. If this ‘News’ service has a dictionary then try looking up the word FACT.

    google – ATOS £2Bn BBC
    What ever you might think of Donald Trump he’s right about that ‘Fake News’ organisation.

    The sponsors of the Channel 4 Paralympic coverage Allianz are Maximus shareholders… ‘Yes You Can’.. fit for work. :/

    Try posting a comment on most ‘media’ sites or ‘Campaign’ group sites or ‘Political’ sites or ‘Charity’ sites…. with a link to The Fraud Act 2006 or The Equality Act 2010 or The Care Act 2014 or Misconduct in Public Office etc etc and see just how rapidly your comment gets deleted.

    >it’s hard to find out what’s happening behind the scenes
    Googling keywords is useful – eg
    google –
    Corbyn PCS DWP
    maybe then add – ATOS Maximus – too.
    :/

    For ‘Charities’ their basic accounts are online at the Charities Commission website… eg..
    Checkout your local Citizens Advice Bureau to see where those ahem… “Independent and Impartial” *bleeps* get their cash from. Mine is getting cash directly from the DWP. As has their ‘National Association of CAB’s’
    :/

    Personally I’m not bothered about book selling or advertising… but getting paid by ‘fronts’ for the DWP/Maximus (Disability Rights UK) and for the Labour run ATOS Welsh Government (Disability Wales)… Well… read The Bribery Act 2010.

    google –
    ATOS Welsh Government
    ATOS Scottish Government
    ATOS London Mayor
    :/
    .

Leave A Reply