Protesters bring ‘rotten PIP’ message to the core of Westminster


Disabled people across the country have marched stopped traffic and blocked the office entrances of government contractors as part of a national day of action that drew attention to a disability benefit they say is “rotten to the core”.

Campaigners believe the personal independence payment (PIP) system was only introduced as a replacement for working-age disability living allowance (DLA) as a way of removing disabled people’s entitlement to support, as part of the government’s austerity programme.

They also point to the growing evidence of the “shoddy nature” of the PIP assessments, carried out by the government’s contractors, Capita and Atos, which they say are “making a killing” from the contracts.

The national day of action featured protests at nearly 20 locations across the country, mostly at Atos and Capita assessment centres, including Edinburgh, Glasgow, Sheffield, Norwich, and Brighton (where protesters included retired Paralympian Kristina Veasey).

There was also support from the cast of Graeae’s musical Reasons to be Cheerful, who tweeted: “@r2bcheerful cast team are in solidarity with #PIPFightback demos around UK today. ‘No’ to PIP delays, cuts & errors.”

The day of action was organised by Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC) and two other user-led, grassroots organisations, WinVisible and the Mental Health Resistance Network.

The largest action took place in central London, with scores of protesters blocking traffic and Capita’s main entrance.

They then marched to the headquarters of the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) in Westminster, before they “faced down the world’s media” on College Green, opposite parliament, as journalists gathered to cover the last day in office of prime minister David Cameron and the first day of his successor, Theresa May.

Disabled activists shouted out the names of disabled people who they believe died as a direct result of the government’s social security cuts and reforms.

Paula Peters, from DPAC, said she wanted Atos and Capita to lose their assessment contracts, with the process brought back in-house, and for PIP to be scrapped and replaced with the old disability living allowance (DLA).

She said: “The assessments are abusive and humiliating, so we want them to stop.”

Peters made it clear that disabled people’s anti-cuts protests would continue under the new prime minister.

She said: “She is just as guilty as David Cameron of the horrendous human rights abuses disabled people have suffered these past six years.

“We won’t stop resisting this government, no matter who the prime minister is.”

In central Birmingham, protesters – including two former chairs of the British Council of Disabled People (BCODP) – were outside the PIP assessment centre used by Capita.

Sandra Daniels (pictured, centre), from DPAC West Midlands, who organised the protest, said she believed the government wanted to cut the number of people receiving DLA by 25 per cent, and that mental health survivors and people with learning difficulties were among those being subjected to “sham assessments and reassessments”, a process she said was “ongoing” and “relentless”.

She said: “I want disabled people to have the benefits and support to be able to be members of the community.

“They should be given the resources they need to uphold their human rights and inclusion in society.

“They are pushing us back to the margins of society once again. Disabled people are losing their independence and will no longer have the opportunity to reach their full potential.”

Anne Pridmore, a former BCODP chair, said she believed the cuts to working-age DLA were “just the start” of a “trickle, trickle” process of cuts to DLA spending, and that the government would eventually begin cutting the higher rate mobility element of DLA from disabled people over the age of 65.

She said the programme of PIP cuts “does not make sense. The government wants to get people in work, but if they take their [Motability] cars off them they are not going to be able to go to work.”

Bob Williams-Findlay, another former BCODP chair, said: “PIP has had a devastating effect on people’s lives and not only those who have lost it, but people here today who are living in fear of being reassessed.

“They know the criteria is so tough that unless you are immobile you are not going to get PIP.”

He said PIP had proved to be not only a deliberate cut to spending on disability benefits but also an attempt to “redefine who is and who is not a disabled person”, and he called for it to be replaced with an improved version of DLA.

He said: “To me, PIP is the epitome of body fascism because it focuses on the body and it doesn’t focus on the social environment and barriers.”

He said he believed PIP contravenes the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which focuses on removing these barriers.

Williams-Findlay said: “Looking at the costs of living as a disabled person, what is it that increases our costs? It’s the barriers.”

He said he had not yet been reassessed for PIP himself, but added: “I live in fear that I will get rejected, because it takes no account of reality. Can you walk 20 metres? Can you pick up a bag of sugar?”

Andrew Comer, a former committee member of Birmingham People First, before it was forced to close this year after losing its funding, said he was waiting to hear the results of his own PIP assessment.

He said: “I am concerned about everything from the [closure of the]Independent Living Fund to PIP.

“People with all kinds of disabilities are not being listened to by the government.”

Another disabled activist, known as “Angry Fish”, who has yet to be reassessed for PIP, said the austerity programme was “doing most damage, and sometimes fatal damage, to disabled people”, including the unnecessary “stress, anxiety and fear” caused by the reassessment process.

He said: “People are having their lives totally ruined by the PIP process and austerity.”

He pointed to the hundreds of people every week who were losing their Motability vehicles after being reassessed for PIP, which could cause many of them to lose their jobs, which could then cause their personal assistants to lose their jobs.

And he called for a new programme to replace PIP, which would provide a “holistic perspective of people’s capacity to engage in society”.

Mark Lynes, another Birmingham protester, said he believed PIP was introduced to “take away support from society” and was an attack on the social security system.

He said: “A lot of people have lost their total independence. They are struggling and have lost their Motability cars.”

Meanwhile, the former senior DWP civil servant Paul Gray has issued a call for evidence as part of his second review of PIP on behalf of the government. The first review took place in 2014.

In announcing the call for evidence, work and pensions secretary Stephen Crabb also announced that his department had launched its own evaluation of PIP, with initial findings to be published by early next year.

Pensions minister Baroness Altmann said the audit would ensure that the advice provided by Capita and Atos was “of suitable quality, is fully explained and is justified”.

Gray, who chairs the social security advisory committee, said the audit followed his recommendation in 2014 that DWP should commission a “rigorous quantitative and qualitative evaluation strategy” to examine the experience of PIP claimants.

He said the audit would run alongside his own review and “may help to inform my final conclusions”.

Gray said that a “major objective” of his second review would be to assess how “further evidence” was used to reach PIP entitlement decisions which “properly reflect claimant needs and the day-to-day functional impacts of their condition”.

This appears to mirror serious, long-standing concerns over DWP’s failure to ensure that the necessary further medical evidence is collected for claimants of employment and support allowance, the out-of-work disability benefit, particularly for those with mental health conditions.

  • User Ratings (14 Votes)
  • PageMonster

    How convenient the media ignored the protests.

  • Samricemonkey

    Why was this not mentioned to anyone? I would have gone along, or at least done something to help; Theresa May should take serious notice of this Osborne scam P.I.P.S; it is nothing but pure evil greed, I know of very seriously ill and disabled people who have been persecuted, and it simply is not fair! The vile “people” who work for Capita should resign now, if they were decent human-beings instead of hateful, nasty, heartless trash!

  • Justin Greenwood

    I recently assisted in a appeal for a pip assessment, the condition was mental health, i cannot go into exact details due to confidentiality, however i can outline the case, this was rejected using the scoring process and was found to be under the figure, in handling the appeal my first read of there paperwork is a non-committal read, I normally don’t draw any thoughts on this however after reading four pages of the medical and even with my limited knowledge of the condition part of me thought is this person actually qualified, i carried on reading and then decided to look them up on the professional body website, they were a physiotherapist, with no indication of specialisation, checking other sites for information and the answer was that there area of physiotherapy was sports and of course the highly respected training of five weeks that seems to outrank doctor’s and psychiatrists nine year training, with this in mind i carried on reading, then i went through it again linking the statements and then started the process of appeal, normally this would take about five hours, i completed a new record i finished in a hour, passed it onto the person handling the appeal and made some modifications, the tribunal went on there favour, then they had a esa assessment just after the pip one and there were concerns raised about the person safety, again looking at the paperwork they agreed there was a issue but we had a assessment that to all extents looked like they were misleading or manipulative statements and had missed parts of the medical that were presented, i also have had two assessments where there was manipulation, statements of contradiction and errors and am glad of one thing that these guys are practicing here and not in a hospital, however in a professional capacity they should be fare and balanced and when there is a error of judgement this should be handled by a outside review with expert by experience involvement relating to the condition and in cases like the three above mandatory reporting not by the person being assessed but by the company in charge of the assessors reporting them to the professional body for review and to decide if there is a case for suspension, supervision or striking of the register, only this will make the process safe as recent comments from doctors assessing under the gmc have been they would not be allowed to practice pending a conduct enquiry, this raises concerns that if they do something wrong or unethical they can still practice and also makes em wonder why do they think they are going to be disciplined in the first place, if they did there job correctly within the set guidelines then they would have nothing to worry about and should have nothing to fear from their own regulating body, which to me gives clear indicators that the way the pay structure for this is worked also needs to be looked at in the context of were they risking a patients life and livelihood for financial gain, a good example being ( A Barham, no doubt one of many that hide under the radar employed by Capita, with thanks to Channel 4 dispatches and the people involved in the whole documentary).