• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / Politics / Anger after Reeves tells benefit claimants: ‘Labour is not for you’
Rachel Reeves

Anger after Reeves tells benefit claimants: ‘Labour is not for you’

By John Pring on 20th March 2015 Category: Politics

Listen

Shadow work and pensions secretary Rachel Reeves has caused outrage among disabled activists after declaring in an interview that Labour was “not the party of people on benefits”.

In an interview in the Guardian, Reeves said: “We don’t want to be seen, and we’re not, [as] the party to represent those who are out of work.”

She added: “Labour are a party of working people, formed for and by working people.”

Bob Ellard, a member of the Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC) steering group, said on Twitter that he had resigned his membership of the party as a result of Reeves’ comments, “as it is clear that non-working disabled people are not wanted within @UKLabour”.

In a blog on its website, DPAC said the remarks were a “huge disappointment” for those who had expected Labour to “take a principled stand against what the coalition is doing to unemployed and disabled people who cannot work, lone parents, carers and pensioners who rely on benefits”.

DPAC also pointed out that Reeves’ comments appeared to suggest – incorrectly – that it was not possible to be both working and claiming benefits such as personal independence payment.

It added: “Is the assumption that claiming benefits only happens to others, slightly apart from the rest of the human race, and who don’t deserve to be represented although they are already the most politically marginalised and unrepresented group?”

Pat Onions, founder of Pat’s Petition, said: “Rachel Reeves is the shadow minister for the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP).

“If she doesn’t want to represent people on welfare then she needs to find another job.

“Sick and disabled people are trying to defend themselves against [Conservative DWP ministers] Iain Duncan Smith and Esther McVey.

“If Rachel Reeves doesn’t want to speak for them then she needs to get out of the way and let someone who does want to speak for them step up.”

Disabled activist and blogger Steven Sumpter, who tweets at @latentexistence, said on Twitter that it was not possible to “ask for a clearer statement of how Labour aren’t going to help”.

Reeves has so far failed to say whether she stands by her comments.

But the Guardian journalist who wrote the article, Amelia Gentleman, said on Twitter that Reeves had gone on to say in the interview that the welfare state “was always supposed to be there to protect people in times of need, whether that was because they lost their job, or they became disabled, or they had a child who is disabled, to help with the cost of childcare, to help you when you are no longer earning because you are retired.”

And she said Reeves had added: “I want to ensure that the welfare state is there for my children and their children in the future.”

Fellow shadow ministers also scrambled to defend Reeves on Twitter.

Kate Green, the shadow minister for disabled people, tweeted that Reeves believed that “Labour represents everyone whether in work or out of work. That means a strong safety net.”

And the shadow care and support minister Liz Kendall tweeted: “@RachelReevesMP is right to say @UKLabour has always fought for work for those that can & security for those who can’t #manynotfew.”

 

Share this post:

TwitterFacebookWhatsAppReddit

Tags: benefits DPAC Kate Green Pat's petition Rachel Reeves

Related

Call for urgent immigration action over care worker shortage
21st January 2021
Tomlinson held just a handful of external meetings every month early in pandemic
7th January 2021
Call for action over ‘scandal’ of benefit claimant suicides ignored by DWP
17th December 2020

Primary Sidebar

Access

Latest Stories

DPOs ‘shocked and dismayed’ over survey, as government faces threat of legal action

Philippa Day: Secret DWP report reveals errors ‘that led to disabled mum’s death’

Philippa Day: Capita made changes to PIP assessments after young mum’s death

Philippa Day: DWP civil servant denies PIP ‘culture of scepticism’

Silence from police chiefs over face mask exemptions, despite gap in guidance

Call for urgent immigration action over care worker shortage

Documentary exposes hostility… and a need for widespread change in attitudes

Statistics regulator refuses to push DWP over impact of universal credit

Philippa Day: Young mother ‘took her own life after being told to attend PIP assessment’

Philippa Day: DWP phone agent ignored sobbing claimant who later ‘took her own life’

Advice and Information

DWP: The case for the prosecution

Readspeaker

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web