• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / News Archive / Concerns remain over assisted suicide guidance

Concerns remain over assisted suicide guidance

By guest on 10th February 2010 Category: News Archive

Listen

Disabled campaigners have given a mixed response to new official guidance on prosecuting cases of assisted suicide.

Some disabled people’s organisations were relieved that the director of public prosecutions, Keir Starmer, had removed “disturbing” elements from the interim guidance he issued last September.

But other campaigners said that publishing any guidance sent a signal that assisted suicide could be acceptable in certain circumstances.

The guidance lists the factors to be considered by the Crown Prosecution Service in deciding whether to charge someone with assisted suicide.

The interim guidance had included 13 factors that would make a prosecution less likely, including whether the victim had a terminal illness, a “severe and incurable physical disability” or a “severe degenerative physical condition”.

It also said a prosecution would be less likely if the suspect was a partner, close friend or relative of the victim.

These two factors have now been removed from the final guidance – following a consultation that produced nearly 5,000 responses – which now lists just six factors that make a prosecution less likely.

These include whether the victim had reached a “voluntary, clear, settled and informed decision” to commit suicide; and whether the suspect was “wholly motivated by compassion”.

Starmer said: “The policy is now more focused on the motivation of the suspect rather than the characteristics of the victim.

“The policy does not change the law on assisted suicide. It does not open the door for euthanasia. It does not override the will of Parliament.

“What it does is to provide a clear framework for prosecutors to decide which cases should proceed to court and which should not.”

Roger Symes, a spokesman for Not Dead Yet UK (NDYUK), which campaigns against legalising assisted suicide, said Starmer appeared to have listened to disabled people’s concerns about the factors concerning disabled victims and relatives.

He said he believed the new guidance would make disabled people safer and made it clear that assisted suicide was still illegal.

But NDYUK was still concerned at the guidance’s “dangerous” suggestion that those motivated by “compassion” would not be prosecuted.

Before the new guidelines were published, Baroness [Jane] Campbell, convenor of NDYUK, warned that they “must not become a check list for those seeking to break the law, even if they believe they are acting with the best of motives”.

Caroline Ellis, joint deputy chief executive of RADAR, said the final guidance was a “breakthrough” because it no longer suggested that disabled people’s lives were less worthy of protection. She said her initial reaction was that disabled people would be safer as a result of the new guidelines.

The Care Not Killing Alliance, whose members include RADAR, said the final guidelines “greatly reduce the risk of undermining existing law” and “stress that the law has not changed, that no-one has immunity from prosecution, and that a prosecution will normally follow unless there are clear and compelling public interest factors to the contrary”.

But it added its voice to concerns about how to determine whether a suspect’s motives were “compassionate”.

Deborah Sowerby, coordinator of a new Facebook campaign, the Campaign for Assisted Living, said she believed publishing any such guidance “devalues life” and implies that assisted suicide can be somehow permissible.

The disability charity Scope agreed, and said it too was “not comfortable with the issuing of guidelines in the first place”.

Richard Hawkes, its chief executive, said it did “not support any weakening of the protection offered under the law on assisted suicide, which is exactly what these new guidelines do”.

He said: “Many disabled people are frightened by the consequences of these new guidelines and with good reason. There is a real danger these changes will result in disabled people being pressured to end their lives.”

RADAR and NDYUK also said that monitoring the effects of the new guidelines would be crucial and called on the government to publish annual statistics on how many cases are referred to prosecutors and how many lead to criminal charges.

The Crown Prosecution Service said it had set up a new national unit to deal with all cases of assisted suicide, although a spokeswoman could not yet confirm whether they would publish annual figures.

25 February 2010

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter)Share on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on RedditShare on LinkedIn
Image of front cover of The Department, showing a crinkled memo with the words 'Restricted - Policy. The Department. How a Violent Government Bureaucracy Killed Hundreds and Hid the Evidence. John Pring.' Next to the image is a red box with the words: 'The Department. Out Now. plutobooks.com' and the Pluto Press logo.

Related

‘Muddled’ blue badge reforms ‘are to blame for renewal delays’
6th February 2015
UN debate will be reminder of true inclusive education
6th February 2015
IDS breaks pledge on PIP waiting-times, as tens of thousands still queue for months
30th January 2015

Primary Sidebar

Against a slanted, grey, memo-type background, the words: 'The Department. How a Violent Government Bureaucracy Killed Hundreds and Hid the Evidence. John Pring.' Next to the image is a red box with the words 'Out Now. plutobooks.com'
Image of front cover of The Department, showing a crinkled memo with the words 'Restricted - Policy. The Department. How a Violent Government Bureaucracy Killed Hundreds and Hid the Evidence. John Pring.' Next to the image is a red box with the words: 'The Department. Out Now. plutobooks.com' and the Pluto Press logo.

Access

Latest Stories

Fear, anger and confusion as budget blundering creates chaos over government’s plans for ‘fit for work’ test

Budget failed on addressing systemic challenges facing disabled people, Treasury is told

SEN improvements ‘could see tens of thousands more disabled children educated in mainstream schools’

Government pledge to scrap discriminatory ban on online attendance ‘could be first step towards inclusion’

Government must reverse Tory policy on adapting to climate change, say disabled activists after court defeat

Regulator’s state of the nation report stays almost silent on safety and quality of adult social care

Title of assisted suicide bill is ‘misleading’ and ‘argumentative’, say disabled campaigners

DWP destroyed recordings that would have proved link to daughter’s suicide, says grieving mum

Wheelchair-user ‘humiliated’ after driver bans him from coach for complaining about safety and discrimination

‘Our members are raging’: Shock and anger as Scottish government’s ‘sham’ co-production leads to ‘weak’ disability plan

Advice and Information

Readspeaker
Image of front cover of The Department, showing a crinkled memo with the words 'Restricted - Policy. The Department. How a Violent Government Bureaucracy Killed Hundreds and Hid the Evidence. John Pring.' Next to the image is a red box with the words: 'The Department. Out now. plutobooks.com' and the Pluto Press logo.

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Threads
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2024 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web