• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / Housing / Long-awaited accessible housing consultation gives little away
Robert Jenrick giving evidence

Long-awaited accessible housing consultation gives little away

By John Pring on 10th September 2020 Category: Housing

Listen

The government has finally published a long-promised consultation on whether it should introduce higher accessibility standards for new housing in England, although it fails to say what kind of reforms ministers want to see.

The consultation paper, Raising Accessibility Standards for New Homes, came more than 14 months after Theresa May promised a consultation on introducing compulsory higher standards, in one of her last acts before resigning as prime minister.

But although the title mentions “raising accessibility standards”, the consultation paper does not suggest which of five possible options for reform ministers support.

Despite coming 14 months after it was announced, the consultation paper is just 21 pages long.

Successive Tory ministers have been repeatedly warned of the dire shortage of suitable accessible housing.

Housing secretary Robert Jenrick (pictured) says in the introduction to the paper that the consultation addresses the issue of inaccessible housing “head on”.

But rather than confirming that the government wants to raise minimum standards, he merely says that the paper “considers bold options” to ensure more homes are built to higher accessibility standards.

He says the consultation forms part of the government’s work on its delayed new national disability strategy, which is not expected to be published until next spring.

The paper’s first option – likely to appeal to the home-building industry – is to simply “wait to see” the impact of new “optional” national technical standards, introduced in 2015.

The paper later describes this as the “do nothing” option.

Three other options would see the minimum accessibility standard improved for nearly all new homes, so that they would have to be built to the basic M4(2)* accessible housing standard.

One of these three options would also see the government setting a minimum proportion of new homes in all areas of England that would have to be built to be fully wheelchair-accessible, according to the M4(3) standard*.

The fifth option suggests a new stricter level of accessibility for the existing M4(1) minimum standard, which “could be pitched between the existing requirements of M4(1) and M4(2)” and is again likely to appeal to the home-building industry.

The consultation paper suggests that introducing a minimum M4(2) standard of accessibility for all new housing in England would cost just £311 million a year, or about £1,400 per new home that would not already have met M4(2).

The consultation closes on 1 December.

Only last month, the government was accused of “showing contempt” for disabled people after publishing an “utterly shameful” 84-page white paper on the future of the planning system, without including a single mention of disabled people, disability or accessible housing.

Last year, Jenrick was warned that he faced the threat of legal action over the government’s failure to take action to solve the crisis in accessible housing.

And two years ago, Disability News Service revealed that representatives of the home-building industry were engaged in a countrywide campaign to defeat attempts by councils to ensure more accessible homes were built in their areas.

*Homes built to the M4(2) standard have 16 accessible or adaptable features, similar to the Lifetime Homes standard developed in the early 1990s to make homes more easily adaptable for lifetime use, while M4(3) homes are those that are supposed to be fully wheelchair-accessible

 

A note from the editor:

Please consider making a voluntary financial contribution to support the work of DNS and allow it to continue producing independent, carefully-researched news stories that focus on the lives and rights of disabled people and their user-led organisations.

Please do not contribute if you cannot afford to do so, and please note that DNS is not a charity. It is run and owned by disabled journalist John Pring and has been from its launch in April 2009.

Thank you for anything you can do to support the work of DNS…

Share this post:

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on Reddit

Tags: accessible housing Lifetime Homes Robert Jenrick wheelchair-accessible

Related

‘Levelling-up’ government cash for 1,000 new homes… but not one of them will have to be wheelchair-accessible
14th April 2022
Hostel ordeal continues, despite ombudsman’s ‘significant injustice’ ruling
17th February 2022
Protesters call for action from council after years of housing failures
28th October 2021

Primary Sidebar

Image shows a man wearing glasses sitting by an open laptop The text reads: Free Career Support for Disabled People Our services include: 1-2-1 Coaching Online Career Resources Find Support near you Search for Inclusive Jobs Career Events and Workshops Visit the Evenbreak Career Hive today to find out how we can help you

Access

Latest Stories

Grenfell: Call for action over government’s ‘deplorable’ decision on evacuation plans

‘Severely neglected’ man found dead, three months after DWP assessment

Government brands DNS ‘vexatious’ for trying to obtain info on 90 DWP deaths

Government’s ‘milestone’ disability jobs stats ‘are meaningless when it comes to equality’

Concern over offensive LGBT+ comments at access awards event

Universal credit boss defends years of misleading information

Discrimination could be a cause of increased risk of Covid death, says ONS

Access to Work in crisis as figures show ‘massive’ waiting-list

Queen’s speech: Activists’ message to Patel over new protest bill: ‘We fight on’

Queen’s speech: Six bills that may change disabled people’s lives, for better and for worse

Advice and Information

The Department for Work and Pensions: Deaths, cover-up, and a toxic 30-year legacy

Readspeaker

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web