• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / Housing / Long-awaited accessible housing consultation gives little away
Robert Jenrick giving evidence

Long-awaited accessible housing consultation gives little away

By John Pring on 10th September 2020 Category: Housing

Listen

The government has finally published a long-promised consultation on whether it should introduce higher accessibility standards for new housing in England, although it fails to say what kind of reforms ministers want to see.

The consultation paper, Raising Accessibility Standards for New Homes, came more than 14 months after Theresa May promised a consultation on introducing compulsory higher standards, in one of her last acts before resigning as prime minister.

But although the title mentions “raising accessibility standards”, the consultation paper does not suggest which of five possible options for reform ministers support.

Despite coming 14 months after it was announced, the consultation paper is just 21 pages long.

Successive Tory ministers have been repeatedly warned of the dire shortage of suitable accessible housing.

Housing secretary Robert Jenrick (pictured) says in the introduction to the paper that the consultation addresses the issue of inaccessible housing “head on”.

But rather than confirming that the government wants to raise minimum standards, he merely says that the paper “considers bold options” to ensure more homes are built to higher accessibility standards.

He says the consultation forms part of the government’s work on its delayed new national disability strategy, which is not expected to be published until next spring.

The paper’s first option – likely to appeal to the home-building industry – is to simply “wait to see” the impact of new “optional” national technical standards, introduced in 2015.

The paper later describes this as the “do nothing” option.

Three other options would see the minimum accessibility standard improved for nearly all new homes, so that they would have to be built to the basic M4(2)* accessible housing standard.

One of these three options would also see the government setting a minimum proportion of new homes in all areas of England that would have to be built to be fully wheelchair-accessible, according to the M4(3) standard*.

The fifth option suggests a new stricter level of accessibility for the existing M4(1) minimum standard, which “could be pitched between the existing requirements of M4(1) and M4(2)” and is again likely to appeal to the home-building industry.

The consultation paper suggests that introducing a minimum M4(2) standard of accessibility for all new housing in England would cost just £311 million a year, or about £1,400 per new home that would not already have met M4(2).

The consultation closes on 1 December.

Only last month, the government was accused of “showing contempt” for disabled people after publishing an “utterly shameful” 84-page white paper on the future of the planning system, without including a single mention of disabled people, disability or accessible housing.

Last year, Jenrick was warned that he faced the threat of legal action over the government’s failure to take action to solve the crisis in accessible housing.

And two years ago, Disability News Service revealed that representatives of the home-building industry were engaged in a countrywide campaign to defeat attempts by councils to ensure more accessible homes were built in their areas.

*Homes built to the M4(2) standard have 16 accessible or adaptable features, similar to the Lifetime Homes standard developed in the early 1990s to make homes more easily adaptable for lifetime use, while M4(3) homes are those that are supposed to be fully wheelchair-accessible

 

A note from the editor:

Please consider making a voluntary financial contribution to support the work of DNS and allow it to continue producing independent, carefully-researched news stories that focus on the lives and rights of disabled people and their user-led organisations.

Please do not contribute if you cannot afford to do so, and please note that DNS is not a charity. It is run and owned by disabled journalist John Pring and has been from its launch in April 2009.

Thank you for anything you can do to support the work of DNS…

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter)Share on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on RedditShare on LinkedIn

Tags: accessible housing Lifetime Homes Robert Jenrick wheelchair-accessible

Image of front cover of The Department, showing a crinkled memo with the words 'Restricted - Policy. The Department. How a Violent Government Bureaucracy Killed Hundreds and Hid the Evidence. John Pring.' Next to the image is a red box with the following words in white: 'A very interesting book... a very important contribution to this whole debate' - Sir Stephen Timms, minister for social security and disability. plutobooks.com and the Pluto Press logo.

Related

Disabled Londoners ‘face disaster’ if mayor and councils fail to take urgent action on accessible housing
6th February 2025
Labour’s ‘watered-down’ response to Grenfell evacuation proposal ‘was a betrayal’
30th January 2025
Rosalie Wilkins: Disabled peer had ‘unwavering belief in justice and equality’
12th December 2024

Primary Sidebar

On one side, against a grey background, are the words: 'A very interesting book... a very important contribution to this whole debate' - Sir Stephen Timms, minister for social security and disability. On the other side, on white against a red background, are the words: 'The Department. How a Violent Government Bureaucracy Killed Hundreds and Hid the Evidence. plutobooks.com.'
Image of front cover of The Department, showing a crinkled memo with the words 'Restricted - Policy. The Department. How a Violent Government Bureaucracy Killed Hundreds and Hid the Evidence. John Pring.' Next to the image is a red box with the following words in white: 'A very interesting book... a very important contribution to this whole debate' - Sir Stephen Timms, minister for social security and disability. plutobooks.com and the Pluto Press logo.

Access

Latest Stories

DWP helped cause mental distress of poverty-stricken benefit claimant who took her own life, says coroner

Second wave of cuts could lead to ‘decimation’ of Access to Work scheme, but DWP refuses to comment

‘Sinister’ government analysis of assisted dying bill adds weight to fears of financial incentives for deaths

Disabled activists gate-crash DWP event and send message to ministers: ‘Your consultation is a sham’

Cuts to disability benefits will exert pressure on services, and likely lead to more deaths, MPs are told

Reports send separate warning shots to English and Scottish governments on social care reform

Activist’s legal threat set to lead to more generous compensation for rail passenger assistance failures

Petition aims to unite opposition to disability benefits green paper and force MPs to debate all cuts

Ministers could face legal action over ‘homes not hospitals’ failure after treating activists ‘with utter contempt’

Protest brings anger at failure to act on ‘homes not hospitals’ plea to government’s front door

Advice and Information

Readspeaker
Image of front cover of The Department, showing a crinkled memo with the words 'Restricted - Policy. The Department. How a Violent Government Bureaucracy Killed Hundreds and Hid the Evidence. John Pring.' Next to the image is a red box with the following words in white: 'A very interesting book... a very important contribution to this whole debate' - Sir Stephen Timms, minister for social security and disability. plutobooks.com and the Pluto Press logo.

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Threads
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2025 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web