• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / News Archive / Workfare controversy: Charities think again on government scheme

Workfare controversy: Charities think again on government scheme

By guest on 2nd February 2012 Category: News Archive

Listen

At least two major disability charities are investigating their involvement in a controversial government programme that has been described by critics as “slave labour”.

The government’s scheme offers work experience to young people for between two and eight weeks, but angry campaigners say it is “workfare”, forcing unemployed people to work for their benefits.

In the wake of the row, several disability charities have examined their own possible involvement in the scheme, particularly over the use of young people as “volunteers” in their charity shops.

Scope announced it was suspending its involvement, and was launching an “inquiry” to find out how many young people had “volunteered” through the scheme in its 237 shops.

The mental health charity Mind said it was going through its files with a “fine-toothed comb” to “get to the bottom of exactly what the situation is here” and whether there had been any examples of “coercive volunteering” in its 122 charity shops.

A Mind spokeswoman said: “We do get some volunteers referred by job centres but we do not know at this stage whether or not this small number of people were there for mandatory work experience rather than being there on a voluntary basis.

“We believe volunteering should be exactly that. We do not believe in coercive volunteering.

“It was certainly not national policy for us to take advantage of this situation. If it has been happening it will have been happening on a very small scale.”

Paul Farmer, Mind’s chief executive, added: “We share the concerns raised by some of our supporters about workfare and the principle of coercive volunteering and will be reviewing our internal procedures to make sure that mandatory placements are not used.”

Another disability charity, Sense, said it had turned down approaches to take part in government work experience schemes, while Mencap said that it “is not – and has never been” involved with the scheme.

Leonard Cheshire Disability has been unable to confirm whether or not it has taken part in the work experience scheme.

Linda Burnip, a member of the steering group of Disabled People Against Cuts, one of the groups that set up the national Boycott Workfare campaign, said: “We hope that [the charities] will backtrack completely and refuse to have anything to do with this scheme, particularly while there are still sanctions available as part of the work placement.”

Dame Anne Begg, the disabled Labour MP who chairs the Commons work and pensions select committee, said she did not believe the coalition’s work experience scheme was an example of “workfare”.

But she added: “I have no problem with work experience at all. There is a problem when it stops becoming voluntary. I think a lot of pressure is on [young people] from Jobcentre Plus to do it.”

She said that work experience of a couple of weeks or a month was reasonable, but if it lasted up to two months the employer should probably be offering a paid job.

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) insisted that the programme was not an example of “workfare”, because the work experience was not compulsory.

A DWP spokeswoman said: “The whole purpose of work experience is to give young people with sometimes very little experience in the world of work to have an opportunity to learn about an organisation… and hopefully impress [the employer] and get a reference. They will learn valuable skills.

“You don’t have to do it so it is not working for your benefits.”

She said the sanctions that could be applied were already part of any jobseeker’s agreement. “If someone works for three weeks and then says they are not going to bother coming in, there might be a potential sanction.

“But if after three weeks you became ill or had a fundamental problem, that would be discussed and could be [a] perfectly reasonable [excuse].”

She added: “I think we would be more than happy to talk to these charities if they had any concerns.”

23 February 2012

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter)Share on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on RedditShare on LinkedIn
A photograph shows an audience raising their hands in a BSL sign. The words say: 'BSL Conference 2025. The future starts with us. Leeds 17-18 July. Be part of shaping the future of Deaf cultures and identities. Get 10% off with BDA10'

Related

‘Muddled’ blue badge reforms ‘are to blame for renewal delays’
6th February 2015
UN debate will be reminder of true inclusive education
6th February 2015
IDS breaks pledge on PIP waiting-times, as tens of thousands still queue for months
30th January 2015

Primary Sidebar

On the left of the image are multiple heads of different colours - white, aqua, red, light brown, and dark green - all grouped together, then the words ‘Campaign for Disability Justice. Sign up to support. #OpportunitySecurityRespect’
A photograph shows an audience raising their hands in a BSL sign. The words say: 'BSL Conference 2025. The future starts with us. Leeds 17-18 July. Be part of shaping the future of Deaf cultures and identities. Get 10% off with BDA10'

Access

Latest Stories

Government ignores warnings of new DWP deaths, and UN intervention, as MPs pass universal credit cuts bill

Urgent letter from UN to Labour government warns: We think your cuts continue Tory attack on disability rights

Race against time to secure DWP deaths evidence before parliament passes new benefit cuts bill

‘Complete shift in thinking’ needed on education of disabled children, says ALLFIE

Minister ignored concerns from disabled advisers, months before publishing cuts bill

Frustration after government only issues partial ban on new floating bus stops

Report suggests five big ideas that could transform disabled people’s mobility

My new book shows exactly why we need the disability movement, says disabled author

‘Disastrous’ cuts bill that leaves legacy of distrust and distress ‘must be dropped’

Four disabled Labour MPs stand up to government over cuts to disability benefits

Advice and Information

Readspeaker
A photograph shows an audience raising their hands in a BSL sign. The words say: 'BSL Conference 2025. The future starts with us. Leeds 17-18 July. Be part of shaping the future of Deaf cultures and identities. Get 10% off with BDA10'

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Threads
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2025 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web