• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Advice/Information
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / Independent Living / Fear over council policy that could force disabled people into care homes
A huge, curved, four-storey municipal building with a pond in front of it

Fear over council policy that could force disabled people into care homes

By John Pring on 21st September 2023 Category: Independent Living

Listen

Disabled activists have said they are “very frightened” by council plans that could force people who rely on social care into residential homes against their wishes, and which they believe breach equality and human rights laws.

Bristol City Council this week blamed cost pressures, reduced government funding and increased demand for social care for its proposed Fair and Affordable Care Policy.

The policy, which is now out for public consultation, would allow the council to force a disabled person into a residential or nursing home if “a care package to remain at home would substantially exceed the affordability of residential care”.

It also warns that exceptions to the policy “are likely to be rare” although “each person’s situation will be looked at individually”.

The policy says that if the council and disabled person cannot reach agreement, the service-user could be offered a direct payment “up to” the amount of a residential care package but would then be expected to meet the rest of their needs themselves.

The council claimed it was taking “pre-emptive measures” to ensure it met its duty to have “sufficient resources to meet the needs of all persons who require care and support in its area”.

In its equality impact assessment of the proposals, the council admits: “Applying this policy could therefore have an impact on some citizens with protected characteristics who previously may have had their care and support needs met in a different or less cost-effective way.”

It also admits that the policy “could have an impact on the percentage of individuals who receive care in their own home and an increase in number of older people who are accommodated in residential or nursing care”.

The consultation was launched this week and closes on 30 October.

Campaigners warned earlier this year that a draft version of the policy could have “catastrophic implications for disabled people’s independence”.

There were concerns then that the policy could breach the Care Act, the Human Rights Act and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

The version put out this week for consultation has not changed substantially.

The grassroots disabled people’s organisation Bristol Reclaiming Independent Living (BRIL), which first raised concerns about the draft document with Disability News Service (DNS), said this week that it was “very frightened” by the policy paper.

A BRIL spokesperson said: “Our message to disabled people throughout the country is if Bristol bring this policy in, your area may be next.”

Disability Rights UK (DR UK) has written to the Labour mayor of Bristol, Marvin Rees, and the leader of the council’s Green group – the largest political grouping on the council – to express its “deep concern” about the policy.

Kamran Mallick, DR UK’s chief executive, says in the two letters: “It is absolutely unacceptable that the draft policy talks about overriding the option to receive care and support in the home if the council decides this would not be ‘cost-effective’.

“We understand that in the round, councils need to have regard to their wider obligations to the public.

“However, at no point should this strategic consideration mean that individual Disabled citizens are refused care and support at home because it is more expensive than residential accommodation.”

He says the policy is incompatible with the Care Act and is “nowhere near strong enough in setting out the council’s Care Act duties to promote well-being, provide person-centred support and meet eligible needs”.

He adds: “We see no way to make this policy workable and would ask that it is withdrawn.”

A Bristol City Council spokesperson said: “The Fair and Affordable Care Policy is currently out for public consultation until 30 October 2023.

“This proposed policy was co-developed with the Bristol City Council Adult Social Care Equalities Forum, which includes representation from disability advocacy groups, and people who draw on care and support, as well as a number of third sector organisations across the city.

“We will consider all the comments and feedback received during the consultation period before any decisions are made and would encourage people to share their views with us here: www.ask.bristol.gov.uk/fair-and-affordable-care-policy-consultation.”

In its equality impact assessment of the policy, the council describes the meetings of its equalities forum that “co-developed” its proposals.

As a result of those meetings, and other engagement work, including with local disabled people’s organisations, the council said it had “expanded and amended some of the wording of the policy to make it more accessible” and now plans to “add some other examples of what best value might look like”.

Picture: City Hall Bristol

 

A note from the editor:

Please consider making a voluntary financial contribution to support the work of DNS and allow it to continue producing independent, carefully-researched news stories that focus on the lives and rights of disabled people and their user-led organisations.

Please do not contribute if you cannot afford to do so, and please note that DNS is not a charity. It is run and owned by disabled journalist John Pring and has been from its launch in April 2009.

Thank you for anything you can do to support the work of DNS…

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter)Share on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on RedditShare on LinkedIn

Tags: Bristol City Council Bristol Reclaiming Independent Living Care Act Disability Rights UK equality act independent living social care

Image of front cover of The Department, showing a crinkled memo with the words ‘Restricted - Policy. The Department. How a Violent Government Bureaucracy Killed Hundreds and Hid the Evidence. John Pring.’ Next to the image is a red box with the following words in white: ‘A very interesting book... a very important contribution to this whole debate’ - Sir Stephen Timms, minister for social security and disability. plutobooks.com and the Pluto Press logo.

Related

Covid inquiry criticised for sidelining disabled people who received support at home in pandemic
22nd October 2026
‘Deep concern’ over minister’s refusal to guarantee free personal care for working-age adults
22nd October 2026
Instagram, Facebook and TikTok fail to act on animations spreading hate and lies about PIP claimants
22nd October 2026

Primary Sidebar

On the left of the image are multiple heads of different colours - white, aqua, red, light brown, and dark green - all grouped together, then the words ‘Join our campaign for a decent life for Disabled people. Campaign for Disability Justice’
Image of front cover of The Department, showing a crinkled memo with the words 'Restricted - Policy. The Department. How a Violent Government Bureaucracy Killed Hundreds and Hid the Evidence. John Pring.' Next to the image is a red box with the following words in white: 'A very interesting book... a very important contribution to this whole debate' - Sir Stephen Timms, minister for social security and disability. plutobooks.com and the Pluto Press logo.

Access

Latest Stories

Covid inquiry criticised for sidelining disabled people who received support at home in pandemic

‘Deep concern’ over minister’s refusal to guarantee free personal care for working-age adults

Instagram, Facebook and TikTok fail to act on animations spreading hate and lies about PIP claimants

The Times blocks DNS from raising concerns with its readers about DWP deaths, in response to Burnham ‘welfare inquiry’ article

Disabled people who rely on PIP face ‘constant fear’ that physical activity could see them lose their benefits

Relationship and sex education failures put disabled pupils at risk of abuse, says new report

Slow but steady progress on UK air travel access improvements, says report

Disability News Service will continue publishing stories, despite indefinite closure of Canary

Conservatives’ £1 billion Motability VAT plan will decimate scheme and raise almost nothing, figures show

Leaked DWP ‘corner-cutting’ plans reveal changes to checks on assessments that will cause ‘even more risk’

Readspeaker
Image of front cover of The Department, showing a crinkled memo with the words 'Restricted - Policy. The Department. How a Violent Government Bureaucracy Killed Hundreds and Hid the Evidence. John Pring.' Next to the image is a red box with the following words in white: 'A very interesting book... a very important contribution to this whole debate' - Sir Stephen Timms, minister for social security and disability. plutobooks.com and the Pluto Press logo.

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Threads
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2026 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web