• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / Independent Living / Government’s social care reforms are a road to nowhere for disabled people, says peer
Baroness Campbell, wearing a breathing mask, sits next to her personal assistant

Government’s social care reforms are a road to nowhere for disabled people, says peer

By John Pring on 9th December 2021 Category: Independent Living

Listen

Controversial government social care reforms would continue to limit the life chances of disabled people, while benefiting the children of wealthier homeowners, a disabled peer has warned the House of Lords.

Baroness [Jane] Campbell said that plans to fix the social care crisis were “the missing part of the jigsaw” of the government’s health and social care bill.

She told fellow peers that the bill “hardly touches on the desperately needed funding reforms” for working-age disabled people, and instead focuses on inheritance issues.

The crossbench peer, who has campaigned for more than a quarter of a century for disabled people’s right to independent living, said: “Under the reforms, the offspring of some wealthier homeowners will enjoy a more generous inheritance when they die.

“However, for disabled people, the bill takes them nowhere and continues to limit their life chances.”

A key social care measure introduced through the bill introduces a lifetime cap of £86,000 on how much anyone pays for personal care, but only counts their personal contributions, rather than those made by their local authority.

So far, the government appears to have made no other pledges on charging for care, other than allowing slightly more generous means-tested support, and introducing a significant increase in the amount of relevant assets (from £23,250 to £100,000) below which people are eligible to receive some financial support from their local authority.

Baroness Campbell pointed out that working-age disabled people make up more than a third of users of social care and account for more than half of local authority spending on social care.

She said that “persistent underinvestment” by successive governments had led to fewer disabled people having access to the support they need, and councils balancing their books by increasing care charges, which, she said, “effectively wipes out the funding that disabled people receive from the DWP to meet their extra living costs and avoid poverty”.

She told fellow peers: “The bill effectively favours wealthier homeowners over those with more modest assets and lifelong disabilities. That cannot be right.

“We know that government investment in social care for working-age disabled people will pay dividends.

“This bill provides the perfect opportunity to do just that, if – and only if – it is amended.

“It is simply unfair to place some people at greater economic disadvantage because they happen to be disabled.”

Another crossbencher, Baroness [Deborah] Bull, former creative director of the Royal Opera House, also criticised the government’s announcement last month that local authority contributions towards care would no longer be counted towards the cap on a person’s lifetime care costs.

She said: “They are likely to receive care for longer periods and therefore to accrue higher costs.

“They are also more likely to pay care costs that do not contribute to the cap, such as the cost of a personal assistant to enable them to work or enjoy social activities.”

She pointed out that Sir Andrew Dilnot – who chaired a commission on care funding, which was set up by the coalition government and reported in 2011 – had proposed a zero cap on the amount anyone developing an eligible need for social care before the age of 40 needed to pay towards their social care.

This was proposed, she said, “on the basis that they could not be expected to have planned for their needs, nor to have accumulated assets to pay for them”.

She told fellow peers: “If the government continue to reject a zero cap, how will they mitigate the risk of catastrophic care costs on those least able to bear them?”

The junior health and social care minister, Lord Kamall, said the government recognised that its amendment on personal contributions to the cap had been “considered controversial” but he said it was “necessary, fair and responsible”.

He said: “Everybody, no matter where they live in the country, no matter their level of starting wealth, will have the contribution they have to make to the cost of their care capped at £86,000.

“Those with lower levels of wealth will be far less likely to have to spend this amount, thanks to a far more generous means-testing regime that we will introduce.”

He promised that “nobody will be worse off in any circumstances than they are in the current system and many people will be better off”, and he said that the government’s reforms differed from previous proposals because they were “credible, deliverable and affordable”.

The bill, which has already been approved by MPs, passed its second Lords reading on Tuesday and will now proceed to its committee stage.

Picture: Baroness Campbell (right) and her personal assistant deliver her speech

 

A note from the editor:

Please consider making a voluntary financial contribution to support the work of DNS and allow it to continue producing independent, carefully-researched news stories that focus on the lives and rights of disabled people and their user-led organisations.

Please do not contribute if you cannot afford to do so, and please note that DNS is not a charity. It is run and owned by disabled journalist John Pring and has been from its launch in April 2009.

Thank you for anything you can do to support the work of DNS…

Share this post:

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on Reddit

Tags: Baroness Bull Baroness Campbell health and care bill independent living Lord Kamall social care social care white paper

Related

More than half of care homes inspected are failing, says regulator
4th August 2022
Watchdog threatens government with legal action over ‘unacceptable’ detentions
28th July 2022
Commission’s report on care ‘is tangible demonstration of what DPOs can achieve’
28th July 2022

Primary Sidebar

Image shows a man wearing glasses sitting by an open laptop The text reads: Free Career Support for Disabled People Our services include: 1-2-1 Coaching Online Career Resources Find Support near you Search for Inclusive Jobs Career Events and Workshops Visit the Evenbreak Career Hive today to find out how we can help you

Access

Latest Stories

‘Truly shocking’ figures expose disabled people’s ‘precarious’ financial situation

Silence from Truss and Sunak on how they would improve lives of disabled people

Claimants win chance to appeal ‘punch in the guts’ court ruling on £20 uplift

Disabled spectators ‘told to move so they would not be in Commonwealth Games photos’

Motability customers describe delays, shortages and steep price rises

DWP dismisses regulator’s call to publish universal credit ‘fitness for work’ stats

Government advisers raise serious concerns over ‘retrograde’ HS2 access issue

Government’s long-awaited accessible housing plan ‘does not go far enough’

Government’s advisers say ministers’ plans will not deliver an accessible railway

Thousands of disabled customers waiting months for cars, Motability admits

Advice and Information

Readspeaker

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web