• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About DNS
  • Subscribe to DNS
  • Advertise with DNS
  • Support DNS
  • Contact DNS

Disability News Service

the country's only news agency specialising in disability issues

  • Home
  • Independent Living
    • Arts, Culture and Sport
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Housing
    • Transport
  • Activism & Campaigning
  • Benefits & Poverty
  • Politics
  • Human Rights
You are here: Home / Transport / Campaigner’s research shows rail access information is often ‘wildly inaccurate’
Doug Paulley, in his wheelchair, surrounded by people

Campaigner’s research shows rail access information is often ‘wildly inaccurate’

By John Pring on 23rd December 2020 Category: Transport

Listen

Information used by disabled passengers to check if a rail station is accessible is frequently “wildly inaccurate”, and often leads them to book travel to and from stations they cannot access, according to new research.

The research by disabled campaigner and access expert Doug Paulley shows that the accuracy of accessibility information has worsened in the two years since the problem was highlighted by the regulator, the Office of Rail and Road (ORR).

Paulley’s research shows that for more than half of stations (51 per cent) across England, Scotland and Wales, the information used by the National Rail Enquiries (NRE) website on the level of step-free access is different from that held by the operators of those stations.

When it comes to the availability of staff to assist disabled passengers, the two sources differ on two-fifths of stations (38 per cent).

And when it comes to whether there is an accessible toilet at a station, the information differs for about one in six stations (16 per cent).

Two years ago, ORR said in its Improving Assisted Travel report (PDF) that the accuracy of this information was “critical” and that “inaccurate, incomplete or unclear information” can lead to assistance being booked for a disabled passenger for a journey that involves a station which is inaccessible to them.

It warned then that there were “significant issues” regarding differences between the information held by station operators and that available through the NRE website, which meant some bookings were “designed to fail”.

Paulley said such information had a “direct and significant impact on disabled people’s rail travel experiences”.

He has told ORR that he sees no sign of “any significant push to improve the accuracy of this data”, and he has offered to help it improve the data.

He told the regulator: “It bothers me greatly that there is so much inaccurate station accessibility information [on the NRE website]… that there has been no improvement in such… and there are no apparent initiatives designed to improve the quality of information it contains.”

He added: “The differences are wild – and who can know which are really true for any given station, if any?”

As a keen and regular user of the rail system, Paulley has confirmed much of the inaccurate information from visits he has made to stations across the network.

He has contacted all the rail operators to inform them of the inaccuracies.

He told one of the operators that 30 of its step-free stations were described as not having step-free access on the NRE website, even though its own database showed they were step-free.

He added: “I have personally been to some of these and can confirm that they do actually have full access.”

He reminded the operator that it was an obligation of its license to ensure that station information was accurate and up-to-date.

Paulley (pictured) told Disability News Service: “There have been too many occasions when I have struggled to find out station accessibility information, where I have been told inaccurate accessibility information, and where assisted travel departments have booked ‘impossible’ journeys for me.

“This shouldn’t be possible.

“The fact that station accessibility info is so poor, enough to make this happen, demonstrates a significant practical problem, but I also think it shows a systemic contempt for disabled passengers.

“The industry knows that this information is lamentably inaccurate, knows that it is under a moral and licensing obligation to ensure it is right – but it doesn’t do so, despite much work and this being drawn to their attention over years.”

He said he believed that the Rail Delivery Group (RDG) – which represents the companies that run Britain’s railways – needs to scrap the database NRE uses, and develop a new one.

And he said that train operating companies should resurvey their access information, providing accurate information about routes – with photographs of access features – across all their stations, with the results feeding into the new database.

An ORR spokesperson said: “We agree this is an important area for improvement.

“There has been progress: train companies and Network Rail are now obliged to publish a wider range of station accessibility information on their websites as well as ensure the information on the National Rail Enquiries website is up to date.

“When it became safe to do so, ORR recently commenced its own detailed monitoring exercise, including station visits to check for accuracy of information and extensive information audits.

“This is a large piece of work that we will continue to take forward subject to travel restrictions.

“We are grateful to Mr Paulley for supplying us with the outcome of his own research, which will help inform our ongoing work.

“We will continue to hold train companies and Network Rail to account for meeting their accessibility obligations.”

Jacqueline Starr, RDG’s chief executive, said: “We want everyone to be able to access train travel easily and with dignity, including disabled people, and we are sorry when we fall short.

“We are taking steps to put things right, including committing £7 million to overhaul National Rail Enquiries and ensure we provide customers with the timely and accurate information that they want.

“We welcome feedback from customers and we will of course review these suggestions and make further changes where needed.”

 

A note from the editor:

Please consider making a voluntary financial contribution to support the work of DNS and allow it to continue producing independent, carefully-researched news stories that focus on the lives and rights of disabled people and their user-led organisations.

Please do not contribute if you cannot afford to do so, and please note that DNS is not a charity. It is run and owned by disabled journalist John Pring and has been from its launch in April 2009.

Thank you for anything you can do to support the work of DNS…

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter)Share on FacebookShare on WhatsAppShare on RedditShare on LinkedIn

Tags: accessible travel assisted travel Doug Paulley National Rail Enquiries Office of Rail and Road Rail Delivery Group

A photograph shows an audience raising their hands in a BSL sign. The words say: 'BSL Conference 2025. The future starts with us. Leeds 17-18 July. Be part of shaping the future of Deaf cultures and identities. Get 10% off with BDA10'

Related

Government’s ‘weak’ response to damning transport access report puts right to travel in ‘grave danger’
19th June 2025
Activist’s legal threat set to lead to more generous compensation for rail passenger assistance failures
8th May 2025
Angry response from campaigners as rail minister seeks to reassure MPs about government’s access plans
10th April 2025

Primary Sidebar

On the left of the image are multiple heads of different colours - white, aqua, red, light brown, and dark green - all grouped together, then the words ‘Campaign for Disability Justice. Sign up to support. #OpportunitySecurityRespect’
A photograph shows an audience raising their hands in a BSL sign. The words say: 'BSL Conference 2025. The future starts with us. Leeds 17-18 July. Be part of shaping the future of Deaf cultures and identities. Get 10% off with BDA10'

Access

Latest Stories

Government ignores warnings of new DWP deaths, and UN intervention, as MPs pass universal credit cuts bill

Urgent letter from UN to Labour government warns: We think your cuts continue Tory attack on disability rights

Race against time to secure DWP deaths evidence before parliament passes new benefit cuts bill

‘Complete shift in thinking’ needed on education of disabled children, says ALLFIE

Minister ignored concerns from disabled advisers, months before publishing cuts bill

Frustration after government only issues partial ban on new floating bus stops

Report suggests five big ideas that could transform disabled people’s mobility

My new book shows exactly why we need the disability movement, says disabled author

‘Disastrous’ cuts bill that leaves legacy of distrust and distress ‘must be dropped’

Four disabled Labour MPs stand up to government over cuts to disability benefits

Advice and Information

Readspeaker
A photograph shows an audience raising their hands in a BSL sign. The words say: 'BSL Conference 2025. The future starts with us. Leeds 17-18 July. Be part of shaping the future of Deaf cultures and identities. Get 10% off with BDA10'

Footer

The International Standard Serial Number for Disability News Service is: ISSN 2398-8924

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Threads
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2025 Disability News Service

Site development by A Bright Clear Web